Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 437–450 | Cite as

Tree structure and cavity microclimate: implications for bats and birds

  • Matthew J. ClementEmail author
  • Steven B. Castleberry
Original Paper

Abstract

It is widely assumed that tree cavity structure and microclimate affect cavity selection and use in cavity-dwelling bats and birds. Despite the interest in tree structure and microclimate, the relationship between the two has rarely been quantified. Currently available data often comes from artificial structures that may not accurately represent conditions in natural cavities. We collected data on tree cavity structure and microclimate from 45 trees in five cypress-gum swamps in the Coastal Plain of Georgia in the United States in 2008. We used hierarchical linear models to predict cavity microclimate from tree structure and ambient temperature and humidity, and used Aikaike’s information criterion to select the most parsimonious models. We found large differences in microclimate among trees, but tree structure variables explained <28 % of the variation, while ambient conditions explained >80 % of variation common to all trees. We argue that the determinants of microclimate are complex and multidimensional, and therefore cavity microclimate cannot be deduced easily from simple tree structures. Furthermore, we found that daily fluctuations in ambient conditions strongly affect microclimate, indicating that greater weather fluctuations will cause greater differences among tree cavities.

Keywords

Cypress-gum swamp Hierarchical linear model Humidity Microclimate Temperature Tree cavity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Carpenter for field assistance and Bat Conservation International for loaning data loggers. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources provided access and housing at all study sites. Funding was provided by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division and the Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources at the University of Georgia.

References

  1. Ardia DR, Perez JH, Clotfelter ED (2006) Nest box orientation affects internal temperature and nest site selection by tree swallows. J Field Ornithol 77:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barclay RMR, Kurta A (2007) Ecology and behavior of bats roosting in tree cavities and under bark. In: Lacki MJ, Hayes JP, Kurta A (eds) Bats in forests: conservation and management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 17–60Google Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-37. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  4. Boyles JG (2007) Describing roosts used by forest bats: the importance of microclimate. Acta Chiropterolog 9:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway CJ, Martin TE (2000) Evolution of passerine incubation behavior: influence of food, temperature, and nest predation. Evolution 54:670–685Google Scholar
  7. Coombs AB, Bowman J, Garroway CJ (2010) Thermal properties of tree cavities during winter in a northern hardwood forest. J Wildl Manag 74:1875–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper SJ (1999) The thermal and energetic significance of cavity roosting in mountain chickadees and juniper titmice. Condor 101:863–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. du Plessis MA, Weathers WW, Koenig WD (1994) Energetic benefits of communal roosting by Acorn woodpeckers during the nonbreeding season. Condor 96:631–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entwistle AC, Racey PA, Speakman JR (1997) Roost selection by the brown long-eared bat Plecotus auritus. J Appl Ecol 34:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grueber CE, Nakagawa S, Laws RJ, Jamieson IG (2011) Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J Evol Biol 24:699–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hooge PN, Stanback MT, Koenig WD (1999) Nest-site selection in the acorn woodpecker. Auk 116:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerth G, Reckardt K (2003) Information transfer about roosts in female Bechstein's bats: an experimental field study. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:511–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerth G, Weissmann K, Konig B (2001) Day roost selection in female Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii): a field experiment to determine the influence of roost temperature. Oecologia 126:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2006) Benefits of living in a building: big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in rocks versus buildings. J Mammal 87:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lourenco SI, Palmeirim JM (2004) Influence of temperature in roost selection by Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera): relevance for the design of bat boxes. Biol Conserv 119:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McComb WC, Noble RE (1981) Microclimates of nest boxes and natural cavities in bottomland hardwoods. J Wildl Manag 45:284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paclik M, Weidinger K (2007) Microclimate of tree cavities during winter nights-implications for roost site selection in birds. Int J Biometeorol 51:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Purcell KL, Verner J, Oring LW (1997) A comparison of the breeding ecology of birds nesting in boxes and tree cavities. Auk 114:646–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quinney TE, Hussell DJT, Ankney CD (1986) Sources of variation in growth of tree swallows. Auk 103:389–400Google Scholar
  21. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org
  22. Racey PA (1973) Environmental factors affecting the gestation in heterothermic bats. J Reprod Fert Suppl 19:175–189Google Scholar
  23. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhodes B, O'Donnell C, Jamieson I (2009) Microclimate of natural cavity nests and its implications for a threatened secondary-cavity-nesting passerine of New Zealand, the South Island saddleback. Condor 111:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson GK (1991) That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat Sci 6:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruczynski I (2006) Influence of temperature on maternity roost selection by noctule bats (Nyctalus noctula) and Leisler's bats (N. leisleri) in Biaowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Can J Zool 84:900–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sedgeley JA (2001) Quality of cavity microclimate as a factor influencing selection of maternity roosts by a tree-dwelling bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus, in New Zealand. J Appl Ecol 38:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Speakman JR, Thomas DW (2003) Physiological ecology and energetics of bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 430–492Google Scholar
  29. Sun D, Pinker RT, Kafatos M (2006) Diurnal temperature range over the United States: a satellite view. Geophys Res Lett 33:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vleck CM, Vleck D, Rahn H, Paganelli CV (1983) Nest microclimate, water-vapor conductance, and water-loss in heron and tern eggs. Auk 100:76–83Google Scholar
  31. Vonhof MJ, Barclay RMR (1997) Use of tree stumps as roosts by the western long-eared bat. J Wildl Manag 61:674–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wachob DG (1996) A microclimate analysis of nest-site selection by mountain chickadees. J Field Ornithol 67:525–533Google Scholar
  33. Walsberg GE, King JR (1978) Heat budget of incubating mountain white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys oriantha) in Oregon. Physiol Zool 51:92–103Google Scholar
  34. Webb DR (1987) Thermal tolerance of avian embryos—a review. Condor 89:874–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Webb DR, King JR (1983) An analysis of the heat budgets of the eggs and nest of the white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys, in relation to parental attentiveness. Physiol Zool 56:493–505Google Scholar
  36. Webb PI, Speakman JR, Racey PA (1995) Evaporative water-loss in 2 sympatric species of Vespertilionid bat, Plecotus auritus and Myotis daubentoni—relation to foraging mode and implications for roost site selection. J Zool 235:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Webster MD, King JR (1987) Temperature and humidity dynamics of cutaneous and respiratory evaporation in pigeons, Columba livia. J Comp Physiol B 157:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiebe KL (2001) Microclimate of tree cavity nests: is it important for reproductive success in northern flickers? Auk 118:412–421Google Scholar
  39. Wilde CJ, Addey CVP, Boddy-Finch LM, Peaker M (1995) Autocrine control of milk secretion: from concept to application. In: Wilde CJ, Peaker M, Knight CH (eds) Intercellular signalling in the mammary gland. Plenum, New York, pp 227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willis CKR, Brigham RM (2007) Social thermoregulation exerts more influence than microclimate on forest roost preferences by a cavity-dwelling bat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zahn A (1999) Reproductive success, colony size and roost temperature in attic-dwelling bat Myotis myotis. J Zool 247:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Western Ecosystems TechnologyBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations