International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1103–1111 | Cite as

The phenology of Rubus fruticosus in Ireland: herbarium specimens provide evidence for the response of phenophases to temperature, with implications for climate warming

  • E. Diskin
  • H. Proctor
  • M. Jebb
  • T. Sparks
  • A. Donnelly
Original Paper

Abstract

To date, phenological research has provided evidence that climate warming is impacting both animals and plants, evidenced by the altered timing of phenophases. Much of the evidence supporting these findings has been provided by analysis of historic records and present-day fieldwork; herbaria have been identified recently as an alternative source of phenological data. Here, we used Rubus specimens to evaluate herbaria as potential sources of phenological data for use in climate change research and to develop the methodology for using herbaria specimens in phenological studies. Data relevant to phenology (collection date) were recorded from the information cards of over 600 herbarium specimens at Ireland’s National Herbarium in Dublin. Each specimen was assigned a score (0–5) corresponding to its phenophase. Temperature data for the study period (1852 – 2007) were obtained from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU); relationships between temperature and the dates of first flower, full flower, first fruit and full fruit were assessed using weighted linear regression. Of the five species of Rubus examined in this study, specimens of only one (R. fruticosus) were sufficiently abundant to yield statistically significant relationships with temperature. The results revealed a trend towards earlier dates of first flower, full flower and first fruit phenophases with increasing temperature. Through its multi-phenophase approach, this research serves to extend the most recent work—which validated the use of herbaria through use of a single phenophase—to confirm herbarium-based research as a robust methodology for use in future phenological studies.

Keywords

Climate warming Flowering Fruiting Herbarium specimen Ireland Phenology Rubus 

References

  1. Alice LA, Campbell CS (1999) Phylogeny of Rubus (rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Am J Bot 86:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aono Y, Kazui K (2007) Phenological data series of cherry tree flowering in Kyoto, Japan, and its application to reconstruction of springtime temperatures since the 9th Century. Int J Climatol 28:905–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackman RL, Eastop VF, Hills M (1977) Morphological and cytological separation of Amphorophora Buckton (Homoptera: Aphididae) feeding on European raspberry and blackberry (Rubus spp.). Bull Entomol Res 67:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolmgren K, Lönnberg K (2005) Herbarium data reveal an association between fleshy fruit type and earlier flowering time. Int J Plant Sci 166:663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchert R (1996) Phenology and flowering periodicity of neotropical dry forest species: evidence from herbarium collections. J Trop Ecol 12:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll E, Sparks T, Donnelly A, Cooney T (2009) Irish phenological observations from the early 20th century reveal a strong response to temperature. Biol Environ Proc R Ir Acad 109:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate change 2007: synthesis report http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/main.html. Accessed 19 August 2010
  9. Crawford PHC, Hoagland BW (2009) Can herbarium records be used to map alien species invasion and native species expansion over the past 100 years? J Biogeogr 36:651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donnelly A, Salamin N, Jones MB (2006) Changes in tree phenology: an indicator of spring warming in Ireland? Biol Environ Proc R Ir Acad 106:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnelly A, Cooney T, Jennings E, Buscardo E, Jones M (2009) Response of birds to climatic variability; evidence from the western fringe of Europe. Int J Biometeorol 53:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitter AH, Fitter RSR (2002) Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296:1689–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitter AH, Fitter RSR, Harris ITB, Williamson MH (1995) Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England. Funct Ecol 9:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallagher RV, Hughes L, Leishman MR (2009) Phenological trends among Australian alpine species: using herbarium records to identify climate-change indicators. Aust J Bot 57:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrington R, Woiwod I, Sparks T (1999) Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 14:146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart HC, Barrington RM (1892) Rediscovery of Rubus chamæmorus in Ireland. Ir Nat 1:124Google Scholar
  17. Hedenäs L, Bisang I, Tehler A, Hamnede M, Jaederfelt K, Odelvik G (2002) A herbarium-based method for estimates of temporal frequency changes: mosses in Sweden. Biol Conserv 105:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hegland SJ, Nielsen A, Lázaro A, Bjerknes A-L, Totland Ø (2009) How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecol Lett 12:184–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Plant Science Center (2010) Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff: background. http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp. Accessed 19 August 2010
  20. Jacobs JH, Clark SJ, Denholm I, Goulson D, Stoate C, Osborne JL (2009) Pollination biology of fruit-bearing hedgerow plants and the role of flower visiting insects in fruit-set. Ann Bot 104:1397–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraft T, Nybom H, Werlemark G (1996) DNA fingerprint variation in some blackberry species (Rubus subg. Rubus, Rosaceae). Plant Syst Evol 199:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lavoie C, Lachance D (2006) A new herbarium-based method for reconstructing the phenology of plant species across large areas. Am J Bot 93:512–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence A (2009) The first cuckoo in winter; phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Glob Environ Chang 19:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lebourgeois F, Pierrat J-C, Perez V, Piedallu C, Cecchini S, Ulrich E (2010) Simulating phenological shifts in French temperate forests under two climate change scenarios and four driving global circulation models. Int J Biometeorol 54:563–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacGillivray F, Hudson IL, Lowe AJ (2010) Herbarium collections and photographic images: alternative data sources. In: Hudson IL, Keatly MR (eds) Phenological research. Springer, London, pp 425–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McElwain L, Sweeney J (2007) Key meteorological indicators of climate change in Ireland. Environmental Research Centre Report, EPAGoogle Scholar
  27. McGrath R, Lynch P, Dunne S, Hanafin J, Nishimura E, Nolan P, Ratnam V, Semmler T, Sweeney C, Wang S (2008) Ireland in a warmer world. Scientific Predictions of the Irish Climate in the Twenty-First Century. Final Report of C4I, DublinGoogle Scholar
  28. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski F, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB, Primack D, Mukunda S (2006) Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phenological changes in response to global warming. Am J Bot 93:1667–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moussus JP, Julliard R, Jiguet F (2010) Featuring 10 phenological estimators using simulated data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Biodiversity Data Centre (2010) Rubus biodiversity maps. http://maps.biodiversityireland.ie. Accessed 20 August 2010
  32. Nybom H, Kraft T (1995) Application of DNA fingerprinting to the taxonomy of European blackberry species. Electrophoresis 16:1731–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prather LA, Alvarez-Fuentes O, Mayfield MH, Ferguson CJ (2004) The decline of plant collecting in the United States: a threat to the infrastructure of biodiversity studies. Syst Bot 29:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Primack D, Imbres C, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ, Del Tredici P (2004) Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston. Am J Bot 91:1260–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robbirt KM, Davy AJ, Hutchings MJ, Roberts DJ (2011) Validation of biological collections as a sources of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes. J Ecol 99:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rumpff L, Coates F, Messina A, Morgan J (2008) Potential biological indicators of climate change: evidence from phenology records of plants along the Victorian Coast. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Technical Report No. 175. Publication of the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  40. Rutishauser T, Luterbacher J, Jeanneret F, Pfister C, Wanner H (2007) A phenology-based reconstruction of internannual changes in past spring seasons. J Geophys Res 112:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sagarin R, Pauchard A (2010) Observational approaches in ecology open new ground in a changing world. Front Ecol Environ 8:379–386. doi:10.1890/090001 Google Scholar
  42. Schmidt K, Höhn H, Graf B, Höpli H (2001) Phänologische entwicklungsstadien der Himbeere (Rubus idaeus L.). Forschung 8:215–222Google Scholar
  43. Schreiner M, Bauer E-M, Kollmann J (2000) Reducing predation of conifer seeds by clear-cutting Rubus fruticosus agg. in two montane forest stands. For Ecol Manag 126:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sparks T (2007) Lateral thinking on data to identify climate impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 22:169–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sparks TH, Carey PD (1995) The response of species to climate over two centuries: an analysis of the Marsham phenological record, 1736-1947. J Ecol 83:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sparks T, Jeffree EP, Jeffree CE (2000) An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phenological records from the UK. Int J Biometeorol 44:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Bourne AS (2007) Including species interactions in risk assessments for global change. Glob Chang Biol 13:1843–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, Burthe S, Bacon PJ, Bell JR, Botham MS, Brereton TM, Bright PW, Carvalho L, Clutton-Brock T, Dawson A, Edwards M, Elliott JM, Harrington R, Johns D, Jones ID, Jones JT, Leech DI, Roy DB, Scott WA, Smith M, Smithers RJ, Winfield IJ, Wanless S (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Chang Biol 16:3304–3313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02165.x Google Scholar
  49. Wada S, Reed BM (2008) Morphological analysis of Rubus seed. Acta Hortic 782:67–84Google Scholar
  50. Walther G, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitfeld J (2001) The budding amateurs. Nature 414:578–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Diskin
    • 1
  • H. Proctor
    • 1
  • M. Jebb
    • 2
  • T. Sparks
    • 3
    • 4
  • A. Donnelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Centre for the EnvironmentTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.National Botanic GardensDublin 9Ireland
  3. 3.Institute of ZoologyPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznańPoland
  4. 4.Sigma, Faculty of Engineering and ComputingCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations