Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1179–1182 | Cite as

Digital herbarium archives as a spatially extensive, taxonomically discriminate phenological record; a comparison to MODIS satellite imagery

  • Isaac W. Park
Short Communication

Abstract

This study demonstrates that phenological information included in digital herbarium archives can produce annual phenological estimates correlated to satellite-derived green wave phenology at a regional scale (R = 0.183, P = 0.03). Thus, such records may be utilized in a fashion similar to other annual phenological records and, due to their longer duration and ability to discriminate among the various components of the plant community, hold significant potential for use in future research to supplement the deficiencies of other data sources as well as address a wide array of important issues in ecology and bioclimatology that cannot be addressed easily using more traditional methods.

Keywords

Phenology Plant ecology Herbarium records Remote sensing Landscape ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dixie Damrel of the Clemson University herbarium, John Nelson of the A.C. Moore Herbarium at the University of South Carolina, and Chris Oakley of the Robert K. Godfrey herbarium at Florida State University for access to their records, as well as Herrick Brown for assistance with herbarium database software, and Mark D. Schwartz, Dr. David Inouye, and an anonymous reviewer for advice that improved this manuscript.

References

  1. Abu-Asab MS, Peterson PM, Shetler SG, Orli SS (2001) Earlier plant flowering in spring as a response to global warming in the Washington, DC, area. Biodivers Conserv 10:597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolmgren K, Lunnberg K (2005) Herbarium data reveal an association between fleshy fruit type and earlier flowering time. Int J Plant Sci 166(4):663–670. doi: 10.1086/430097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulter SL, Kitching RL, Howlett BG (2006) Family, visitors and the weather: patterns of flowering in tropical rainforests of northern Australia. J Ecol 94(2):369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook BI, Cook ER, Huth PC, Thompson JE, Forster A, Smiley D (2007) A cross-taxa phenological dataset from Mohonk Lake, NY and its relationship to climate. Int J Climatol 28:1369–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaira KS, Dhar U, Belwal OK (2011) Potential of herbarium records to sequence phenological pattern: a case study of Aconitum heterophyllum in the Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv 20(10):2201–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallagher RV, Hughes L, Leishman MR (2009) Ohenological trends among Australian alpine species: using herbarium records to identify climate-change indicators. Aust J Bot 57(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knyazikhin Y, Glassy J, Privette JL, Tian Y, Lotsch A, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Morisette JT, Votava P, Myneni RB, Nemani RR, Running SW (1999) MODIS leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (FPAR) product (MOD15) algorithm theoretical basis document. http://eospsogsfcnasagov/atbd/modistableshtml
  8. Lavoie C, Lachance D (2006) A new herbarium-based method for reconstructing the phenology of plant species across large areas. Am J Bot 93(4):512–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Loiselle BA, Jørgensen PM, Consiglio T, Jiménez I, Blake JG, Lohmann LG, Montiel OM (2007) Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? J Biogeogr 35(1):105–116Google Scholar
  10. Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB, Primack D, Mukunda S (2006) Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phenological changes in response to global warming. Am J Bot 93(11):1667–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Myneni RB, Hoffman S, Knyazikhin Y, Privette JL, Glassy J, Tian Y, Wang Y, Song X, Zhang Y, Smith GR, Lotsch A, Friedl M, Morisette JT, Votava P, Nemani RR, Running SW (2002) Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ 83:214–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neil KL, Landrum L, Wu J (2010) Efftects of urbanization on flowering phenology in the metropolitan phoenix region of USA: findings from herbarium records. J Arid Environ 74(4):440–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Primack D, Imbres C, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ (2004) Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston. Am J Bot 91(8):1260–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reed BC, Schwartz MD, Xiao X (2009) Remote sensing phenology: status and the way forward. In: Noormets A (ed) Phenology of ecosystem Processes: applications in global change. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Robbirt KM, Davy AJ, Hutchings MJ, Roberts DL (2011) Validation of biological collections as a source of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes. J Ecol 99(1):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwartz MD (ed) (2003) Phenology: an integrative environmental science. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. White MA, DeBeurs KM, Didan K, Inouye DW, Richardson AD, Jensen OP, O'Keefe J, Zhang G, Nemani RR, VanLeeuwen WJD, Brown JF, DeWit A, Schaepman M, Lin X, Dettinger M, Bailey AS, Kimball J, Schwartz MD, Baldocchi D, Lee JT, Lauenroth WK (2009) Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006. Glob Chang Biol 15(10):2335–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zalamea P-C, Munoz F, Stevenson PR, Paine CET, Sarmiento C, Sabatier D, Heuret P (2011) Continental-scale patterns of Cecropia reproductive phenology: evidence from herbarium specimens. Proc R Soc London B 278(1717):2437–2445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations