International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 56, Issue 5, pp 903–914 | Cite as

The phenology of cherry blossom (Prunus yedoensis “Somei-yoshino”) and the geographic features contributing to its flowering

  • Yukitaka Ohashi
  • Hiroshi Kawakami
  • Yoshinori Shigeta
  • Hiroshi Ikeda
  • Nobuko Yamamoto
Original Paper

Abstract

We investigated relationships between the flowering phenology of Prunus yedoensis “Somei-yoshino” (cherry blossom) and the local temperatures in Japan. Our observations were carried out across the Okayama Plain, which included Okayama City (about 700,000 inhabitants), from the winter of 2008 to the spring of 2009. Local air temperature (AT) and the globe temperature (GT) were recorded at the tree height. The flowering dates (FDs) of P. yedoensis were earliest in the central commercial area (located at the center of the plain), followed by the north residential area (further inland), and finally the south residential area (seaward). The recorded FDs were related to the period-averaged daily maximum/minimum AT and GT, and the phenologically effective AT and GT defined in this study. Of these parameters, the phenologically effective GTs correlated most with the FDs. Since the GT is determined by AT, solar and infrared radiations, and wind speed, our previous result suggests that a combination of these three components surrounding the tree is more important for budding and flowering than is AT alone. The supposition is supported by the flowering of P. yedoensis being the latest at the coastal region of the Okayama Plain where the AT were higher than at the inland region, excluding the urban area; it is probably caused by stronger winds there than at the other sites.

Keywords

Prunus yedoensis Phenology Flowering date Air temperature Globe temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all associated institutions for their great assistance with our temperature measurements. We also appreciate the valuable advice given by the laboratory students of Prof. Yoshio Hada at the Okayama University of Science. In addition, we are grateful to Prof. Osamu Tsukamoto of Okayama University for providing the required instruments.

References

  1. Aono Y, Moriya C (2003) A generalized model to estimate flowering for cherry tree (Prunus yedoensis) considering both processes of endodormancy completion and development. J Agric Meteorol 59:165–177 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aono Y, Omoto Y (1990) A simplified method for estimation of blooming date for the cherry by means of DTS. J Agric Meteorol 46:147–151 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aono Y, Saito S (2010) Clarifying springtime temperature reconstructions of the medieval period by gap-filling the cherry blossom phenological data series at Kyoto, Japan. Int J Biometeorol 54:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaubien EG, Freeland HJ (2000) Spring phenology trends in Alberta, Canada: links to ocean temperature. Int J Biometeorol 44:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caffarra A, Donnelly A (2011) The ecological significance of phenology in four different tree species: effects of light and temperature on bud burst. Int J Biometeorol 55:711–721Google Scholar
  6. Clark RM, Thompson R (2010) Predicting the impact of global warming on the timing of spring flowering. Int J Climatol 30:1599–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruz VMV, Luhman R, Marek LF, Rife CL, Shoemaker RC, Brummer EC, Gardner CAC (2007) Characterization of flowering time and SSR marker analysis of spring and winter type Brassica napus L. germplasm. Euphytica 153:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhami I (2008) Urban tree phenology: A comparative study between New York City and Ithaca. West Virginia University, New York. DissertationGoogle Scholar
  9. Egea J, Ortega E, Martinez-Gomez P, Dicenta F (2003) Chilling and heat requirements of almond cultivars for flowering. Environ Exp Bot 50:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher RV, Hughes L, Leishman MR (2009) Phenological trends among Australian alpine species: using herbarium records to identify climate-change indicators. Aust J Bot 57:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grab S, Craparo A (2011) Advance of apple and pear tree full bloom dates in response to climate change in the southwestern Cape, South Africa: 1973–2009. Agric Forest Meteorol 151:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hudson IL (2010) Interdisciplinary approaches: towards new statistical methods for phenological studies. Clim Chang 100:143–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hudson IL, Keatley MR (2010) Phenological research: methods for environmental and climate change analysis. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Innan H, Terauchi R, Miyashita NT, Tsunewaki K (1995) DNA fingerprinting study on the intraspecific variation and the origin of Prunus yedoensis (Someiyoshino). Jpn J Genet 70:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keatley MR, Hudson IL (2007) Shift in flowering dates of Australian plants related to climate: 1983–2006. MODSIM07 Land, Water and Environmental Management: Integrated Systems for Sustainability, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 504–510Google Scholar
  16. Keatley MR, Fletcher TD, Hudson IL, Ades PK (2002) Phenological studies in Australia: potential application in historical and future climate analysis. Int J Climatol 22:1769–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lakatos L, Gulyas A (2003) Connection between phenological phase and urban heat island in Debrecen and Szeged, Hungary. Acta Climatol Chorol 36–37:79–83Google Scholar
  18. Lee KJ, Sohn JH, Reder K, Yun HY (2007) Selection of early and late flowering Robinia pseudoacacia from domesticated and introduced cultivars in Korea and prediction of flowering period by accumulated temperature. J Korean For Soc 96:170–177Google Scholar
  19. Lu P, Yu Q, Liu J, Lee X (2006) Advance of tree-flowering dates in response to urban climate change. Agric Forest Meteorol 138:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacGillivray F, Hudson IL, Lowe AJ (2010) Herbarium collections and photographic images: alternative data sources for phenological research. In: Hudson IL, Keatley MR (eds) Phenological research: methods for environmental and climate change analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 425–463Google Scholar
  21. Maruoka T, Itoh H (2009) Impact of global warming on flowering of cherry trees (Prunus yedoensis) in Japan. J Agric Meteorol 65:283–296 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsumoto F (2003) Effects of urban warming on flowering of Prunus yedoensis: in case of flower bud development. Papers Environ Inf Sci 17:41–46 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Matsumoto F, Fukuoka Y (2003) Effects of urban warming on plant phenology: The Prunus yedoensis flowering date in Kumagaya City. Geogr Rev Jpn 76:1–18 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matsumoto F, Mikami T, Fukuoka Y (2006) Effects of urban warming on the Prunus yedoensis flowering date: for Tokyo metropolitan area. Geogr Rev Jpn 79:322–334 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mimet A, Pellissier V, Quenol H, Aguejdad R, Dubreuil V, Roze F (2009) Urbanisation induces early flowering: evidence from Platanus acerifolia and Prunus cerasus. Int J Biometeorol 53:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nordli Ø, Wielgolaski FE, Bakken AK, Hjeltnes SH, Mage F, Sivle A, Skre O (2008) Regional trends for bud burst and flowering of woody plants in Norway as related to climate change. Int J Biometeorol 52:625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliveira M (1998) Calculation of budbreak and flowering base temperatures for Vitis vinifera cv. Touriga Francesa in the Douro region of Portugal. Am J Enol Vitic 49:74–78Google Scholar
  28. Omoto Y, Aono Y (1989) Estimation of blooming date for Prunus yedoensis by means of kinetic method. J Agric Metorol 45:25–31 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Omoto Y, Aono Y (1990) Estimation of change in blooming dates of cherry flower by urban warming. J Agric Metorol 46:123–129 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orlandi E, Garcia-Mozo H, Galan C, Romano B, Guardia CD, Ruiz L, Trigo MM, Dominguez-Vilches E, Fornaciari M (2010) Olive flowering trends in a large Mediterranean area (Italy and Spain). Int J Biometeorol 54:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Piper EL, Boote KJ, Jones JW, Grimm SS (1996) Comparison of two phenology models for predicting flowering and maturity date of soybean. Crop Sci 36:1606–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roetzer T, Wittenzeller M, Haeckel H, Nekovar J (2000) Phenology in central Europe: Differences and trends of spring phenophases in urban and rural areas. Int J Biometeorol 44:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruml M, Milatovic D, Vulic T (2011) Predicting apricot phenology using meteorological data. Int J Biometeorol 55:723–732Google Scholar
  34. Saijo K, Wada E (2010) Relationship between blooming processes of Prunus yedoensis and land use in Sendai. Research Bulletin of Environmental Education Center. Miyagi Univ Educ 12:95–101 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. Shahidullah SM, Hanafi MM, Ashrafuzzaman M, Razi Ismail M, Salam A (2009) Phenological characters and genetic divergence in aromatic rices. Afr J Biotechnol 8:3199–3207Google Scholar
  36. Shinohara H (1951) On the period, the temperature of which mostly influences the flowering date of the cherry (P. Yedoensis). J Agric Meteorol 7:19–20 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snyder RL, Spano D, Cesaraccio C, Duce P (1999) Determining degree-day thresholds from field observations. Int J Biometeorol 42:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soheilivand S, Agayev YM, Shakib AM, Fathi M, Rezvani E (2007) Comparison of diversity in flowering rate of two saffron (Crocus sativus) populations of Iran. Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Saffron Biology and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson R, Clark RM (2006) Spatio-temporal modeling and assessment of within-species phenological variability using thermal time methods. Int J Biometeorol 50:312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson R, Clark RM (2008) Is spring starting earlier? Holocene 18:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torres C, Galetto L (2011) Flowering phenology of co-occurring Asteraceae: a matter of climate, ecological interactions, plant attributes or of evolutionary relationships among species? Org Divers Evol 11:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walkovszky A (1998) Changes in phenology of the locust tree (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in Hungary. Int J Biometeorol 41:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeinali H, Tabaei-Aghdaei SR, Arzani A (2009) A study of morphological variations and their relationship with flower yield and yield components in Rosa damascena. J Agric Sci Technol 11:439–448Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukitaka Ohashi
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Kawakami
    • 1
  • Yoshinori Shigeta
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hiroshi Ikeda
    • 4
  • Nobuko Yamamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of InformaticsOkayama University of ScienceKita-kuJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Natural Science and TechnologyOkayama UniversityKita-kuJapan
  3. 3.Department of Environment SystemRissho UniversityKumagayaJapan
  4. 4.The University MuseumThe University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations