Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 56, Issue 5, pp 887–893 | Cite as

The relationship between environmental temperature and clothing insulation across a year

  • JuYoun KwonEmail author
  • Jeongwha Choi
Original Paper

Abstract

People adapt to thermal environments, such as the changing seasons, predominantly by controlling the amount of clothing insulation, usually in the form of the clothing that they wear. The aim of this study was to determine the actual daily clothing insulation on sedentary human subjects across the seasons. Thirteen females and seven males participated in experiments from January to December in a thermal chamber. Adjacent months were grouped in pairs to give six environmental conditions: (1) January/February = 5°C; (2) March/April = 14°C; (3) May/June = 25°C; (4) July/August = 29°C; (5) September/October = 23°C; (6) November/December = 8°C. Humidity(45 ± 5%) and air velocity(0.14 ± 0.01 m/s) were constant across all six experimental conditions. Participants put on their own clothing that allowed them to achieve thermal comfort for each air temperature, and sat for 60 min (1Met). The clothing insulation (clo) required by these participants had a significant relationship with air temperature: insulation was reduced as air temperature increased. The range of clothing insulation for each condition was 1.87–3.14 clo at 5°C(Jan/Feb), 1.62–2.63 clo at 14°C(Mar/Apr), 0.87–1.59 clo at 25°C(May/Jun), 0.4–1.01 clo at 29°C(Jul/Aug), 0.92–1.81 clo at 23°C (Sept/Oct), and 2.12–3.09 clo at 8°C(Nov/Dec) for females, and 1.84–2.90 clo at 5°C, 1.52–1.98 clo at 14°C, 1.04–1.23 clo at 25°C, 0.51–1.30 clo at 29°C, 0.82–1.45 clo at 23°C and 1.96–3.53 clo at 8°C for males. The hypothesis was that thermal insulation of free living clothing worn by sedentary Korean people would vary across seasons. For Korean people, a comfortable air temperature with clothing insulation of 1 clo was approximately 27°C. This is greater than the typical comfort temperature for 1 clo. It was also found that women clearly increased their clothing insulation level of their clothing as winter approached but did not decrease it by the same amount when spring came.

Keywords

Clothing insulation Human response Air temperature Thermal comfort Clothing layer Clothing weight 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the volunteers who took part in this study over a 12-month period. This research was supported partially by the Second Stage of BK 21. This study was also supported by 2011 Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Al-ajmi FF, Loveday DL, Bedwell KH, Havenith G (2008) Thermal insulation and clothing area factors of typical Arabian gulf clothing ensembles for males and females: measurements using thermal manikins. Appl Ergon 39:407–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASHRAE (1985) ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi J (1979) Thermal insulation of women’s Korean style clothes studied with a thermal manikin. Kobe J Med Sci 25:133–149Google Scholar
  4. Choi J, Mizunashi S (1977) Experimental study on the thermal insulation of the Korean woman’s clothes-comparison of Korea-styled clothes with western-styled clothes. J Home Econ Jpn 28(5):344–350Google Scholar
  5. Choi J, Lee JY, Kim SY (2003) Effects of thermal underwear on thermal and subjective responses in winter. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 22(1):29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donaldson GC, Rintamäki H, Näyhä S (2001) Outdoor clothing: its relationship to geography, climate, behaviour and cold-related mortality in Europe. Int J Biometeorol 45:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBois D, DuBois EF (1916) A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 17:863–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frisancho AR (1993) Human adaptation and accommodation. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldman RF, Kampmann B (2007) Handbook on clothing; biomedical effect of military clothing and equipment systems, 2nd edn. International Society for Environmental Ergonomics. http://www.environmental-ergonomics.org/
  10. Griefahn B, Forsthoff A (1997) Comparison between estimated worn clothing insulation and required calculated clothing insulation in moderately cold environments(0°C ≤ ta ≤ +15°C). Appl Ergon 28(4):295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Havenith G, Nilsson HO (2004) Correction of clothing insulation for movement and wind effects, a meta-analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004:636–640Google Scholar
  12. Holmér I (1985) Heat exchange and thermal insulation compared in woolen and nylon garments during wear trials. Textile Res J 9:511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO10551 (2001) Ergonomics of the thermal environment-assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO11079 (2007) Ergonomics of the thermal environment-determination and interpretation of cold stress when using required clothing insulation (IREQ) and local cooling effects. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO7730 (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment-analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. ISO8996 (2004) Ergonomics of the thermal environment-determination of metabolic rate. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. ISO9920 (2007) Ergonomics of the thermal environment-estimation of thermal insulation and water vapour resistance of a clothing ensemble. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuklane K, Holmer I, Gao C, Havenith G (2007) Calculation of clothing insulation by serial and parallel methods: effects on clothing choice by IREQ and thermal responses in the cold. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 13(2):103–116Google Scholar
  19. Lee JY, Ko ES, Lee HH, Kim JY, Choi J (2011) Validation of clothing insulation estimated by global and serial methods. Int J Cloth Sci Technol 23:184–198Google Scholar
  20. McCullough EA, Jones BW, Huck PEJ (1985) A comprehensive data base for estimating clothing insulation. ASHRAE Trans 91(2):29–47Google Scholar
  21. Nevins RG, McNall PE, Stolwijk JAJ (1974) How to be comfortable at 65 to 68 degrees. ASHRAE J 1974: 41–43Google Scholar
  22. Nielsen R (1986) Clothing and thermal environments; field studies on industrial work in cool conditions. Appl Ergon 17(1):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olesen B, Sliwinska E, Madsen T, Fanger PO (1982) Effect of body posture and activity on the insulation of clothing. ASHRAE Trans 32:791–805Google Scholar
  24. Oliveira AVM, Branco VJ, Gaspar AR, Quintela DA (2011) Dynamic clothing insulation. Measurements with a thermal manikin operating under the thermal comfort regulation mode. Appl Ergon 42:890–899Google Scholar
  25. Parsons KC (2003) Human thermal environments, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Rohles FH, Woods JE, Nevins RG (1973) The influence of clothing and temperature on sedentary comfort. ASHRAE Trans 79(2):71–80Google Scholar
  27. Winslow CEA, Herrington LP (1949) Temperature and human life. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EngineeringNational Academy of Agricultural ScienceSuwonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Clothing and TextilesSeoul National University/Research Institute of Human EcologySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations