International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 411–422

Evaluation of different methods for determining growing degree-day thresholds in apricot cultivars

Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine different methods for determining growing degree-day (GDD) threshold temperatures for two phenological stages (full bloom and harvest) and select the optimal thresholds for a greater number of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars grown in the Belgrade region. A 10-year data series were used to conduct the study. Several commonly used methods to determine the threshold temperatures from field observation were evaluated: (1) the least standard deviation in GDD; (2) the least standard deviation in days; (3) the least coefficient of variation in GDD; (4) regression coefficient; (5) the least standard deviation in days with a mean temperature above the threshold; (6) the least coefficient of variation in days with a mean temperature above the threshold; and (7) the smallest root mean square error between the observed and predicted number of days. In addition, two methods for calculating daily GDD, and two methods for calculating daily mean air temperatures were tested to emphasize the differences that can arise by different interpretations of basic GDD equation. The best agreement with observations was attained by method (7). The lower threshold temperature obtained by this method differed among cultivars from −5.6 to −1.7°C for full bloom, and from −0.5 to 6.6°C for harvest. However, the “Null” method (lower threshold set to 0°C) and “Fixed Value” method (lower threshold set to −2°C for full bloom and to 3°C for harvest) gave very good results. The limitations of the widely used method (1) and methods (5) and (6), which generally performed worst, are discussed in the paper.

Keywords

Threshold temperature Growing degree-days Apricot Full bloom Harvest 

References

  1. Arnold CY (1959) The development and significance of the base temperature in a linear heat unit system. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 74:430–445Google Scholar
  2. Črepinšek Z, Kajfež-Bogataj L, Bergant K (2006) Modelling of weather variability effect on fitophenology. Ecol Model 194:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Degrandi-Hoffman G, Thorp R, Loper G, Eisikowitch D (1996) Describing the progression of almond bloom using accumulated heat units. J Appl Ecol 33:812–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galán C, García-Mozo H, Cariñanos P, Alcazar P, Dominguez-Vilches E (2001) The role of temperature in the onset of the Olea europaea L. pollen season in southwestern Spain. Int J Biometeorol 45:8–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Guerriero R, Monteleone P (2006) Thermal requirement from blooming to ripening in some apricot cultivars. Acta Hort 701:95–98Google Scholar
  6. Janssen PHM, Heuberger PSC (1995) Calibration of process-oriented models. Ecol Model 83:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW (1997) Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric For Meteorol 87:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Milatović D, Ruml M, Vulić T (2008) Heat requirement from blooming to maturing in apricot cultivars. XIV International symposium on apricot breeding and culture, Matera (Italy), 16–20 June 2008. Book of abstracts, poster 5.11Google Scholar
  9. Richardson EA, Seeley SD, Walker DR, Anderson JL, Ashcroft GL (1975) Pheno-climatography of spring peach bud develoment. HortScience 10:236–237Google Scholar
  10. Ring DR, Harris MK, Jackman JA, Henson JL (1983) A Fortran computer program for determining start date and base temperature for degree-day models. The Texas Agric Exp St Bull MP-1537. The Texas University System, College StationGoogle Scholar
  11. Snyder RL, Spano D, Cesaraccio C, Duce P (1999) Determining degree-day thresholds from field observations. Int J Biometeorol 42:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tabuenca MC, Herrero J (1965) Influencia de la temperatura en la época de floración de frutales. An Aula Dei 8:115–153Google Scholar
  13. Valentini N, Me G, Spanna F, Lovisetto M (2004) Chilling and heat requirement in apricot and peach varieties. Acta Hort 636:199–203Google Scholar
  14. Weiss A, Hays CJ (2005) Calculating daily mean air temperatures by different methods: implications from a non-linear algorithm. Agric For Meteorol 128:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wielgolaski FE (1999) Starting dates and basic temperatures in phenological observations of plants. Int J Biometeorol 42:158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang S, Logan J, Coffey DL (1995) Mathematical formulae for calculating the base temperature for growing degree-days. Agric For Meteorol 74:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yildiz AA, Yildiz A, Kaska N, Çaglar S (1997) Effective heat summations of some apricot cultivars and types in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Acta Hort 441:423–426Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations