International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 617–627 | Cite as

Assessing the heat tolerance of 17 beef cattle genotypes

  • J. B. Gaughan
  • T. L. Mader
  • S. M. Holt
  • M. L. Sullivan
  • G. L. Hahn
Original Paper

Abstract

Cattle production plays a significant role in terms of world food production. Nearly 82% of the world’s 1.2 billion cattle can be found in developing countries. An increasing demand for meat in developing countries has seen an increase in intensification of animal industries, and a move to cross-bred animals. Heat tolerance is considered to be one of the most important adaptive aspects for cattle, and the lack of thermally-tolerant breeds is a major constraint on cattle production in many countries. There is a need to not only identify heat tolerant breeds, but also heat tolerant animals within a non-tolerant breed. Identification of heat tolerant animals is not easy under field conditions. In this study, panting score (0 to 4.5 scale where 0 = no stress and 4.5 = extreme stress) and the heat load index (HLI) [HLIBG<25°C = 10.66 + 0.28 × rh + 1.30 × BG – WS; and, HLI BG> 25°C = 8.62 + 0.38 × rh + 1.55 × BG – 0.5 × WS + e(2.4 – WS), where BG = black globe temperature (oC), rh = relative humidity (decimal form), WS = wind speed (m/s) and e is the base of the natural logarithm] were used to assess the heat tolerance of 17 genotypes (12,757 steers) within 13 Australian feedlots over three summers. The cattle were assessed under natural climatic conditions in which HLI ranged from thermonuetral (HLI < 70) to extreme (HLI > 96; black globe temperature = 40.2°C, relative humidity = 64%, wind speed = 1.58 m/s). When HLI > 96 a greater number (P < 0.001) of pure bred Bos taurus and crosses of Bos taurus cattle had a panting score ≥ 2 compared to Brahman cattle, and Brahman-cross cattle. The heat tolerance of the assessed breeds was verified using panting scores and the HLI. Heat tolerance of cattle can be assessed under field conditions by using panting score and HLI.

Keywords

Heat tolerance Cattle Panting score Heat load index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by Meat Livestock Australia P/L, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Thanks to Mr Allan Lisle for statistical analysis, Mr Robert Englebright and Mr Ian Williams for their technical support. A special thanks to the management and staff of the feedlots who participated in the studies.

References

  1. Bianca W (1961) Heat tolerance in cattle-its concept, measurement and dependence on modifying factors. Int J Biometeorol 1:5–30. doi: 10.1007/BF02186917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 1: Analyses of indicators. J Biosys Eng 90:451–462. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Eigenberg RA, Mader TL, Morrow JL, Dailey JW (2006) Comparison of heat tolerance of feedlot heifers of different breeds. Livest Sci 105:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chase CC Jr, Riley DG, Olson TA, Coleman SW, Hammond AC AC (2004) Maternal and reproductive performance of Brahman × Angus, Senepol × Angus, and Tuli × Angus cows in the subtropics. J Anim Sci 82:2764–2772Google Scholar
  5. Clarke MR, Kelly AM (1996) Some effects of shade on Hereford steers in a feedlot. Anim Prod Aus 21:235–238Google Scholar
  6. Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM, Josey MJ, Rowan KJ (1999) Heat tolerance of Boran and Tuli crossbred steers. J Anim Sci 77:23986–2405Google Scholar
  7. Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM (2008) A new heat load index for feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 86:226–234. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hahn GL (1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J Anim Sci 77:10–20Google Scholar
  9. Hahn GL, Mader TL (1997) Heat waves in relation to thermoregulation, feeding behaviour and mortality of feedlot cattle. Proceedings of the 5th International Livestock Environment Symposium, Bloomington, MN, pp 563–571Google Scholar
  10. Hammond AC, Chase CC Jr, Bowers EJ, Olson TA, Randel RD (1998) Heat tolerance in Tuli-, Senepol-, and Brahman-sired F1 Angus heifers in Florida. J Anim Sci 76:1568–1577Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmann I, Beate S (2006) Animal genetic resources - time to worry? In: Livestock Report 2006. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. pp 57–76Google Scholar
  12. Hungerford LL, Buhman MJ, Dewell RD, Mader TL, Griffin D, Smith DR, Nienaber JA (2000) Investigation of heat stress mortality in four midwest feedlots. Proceedings of International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, 616, Breckenridge, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. McManus C, Prescott E, Paludo GR, Bianchini E (2009) Heat tolerance in naturalized Brazilian cattle breeds. Livest Sci 120:256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mader TL, Fell LR, McPhee MJ (1997) Behavior response of non-Brahman cattle to shade in commercial feedlots. Proceedings of the 5th Livestock Environment International Symposium, Bloomington, MN, USA, pp 795–802Google Scholar
  15. Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T (2006) Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 84:712–719Google Scholar
  16. Mitlöhner FM, Morrow JL, Daily DW, Wilson SC, Galyean ML, Miller MF, McGlone JJ (2001) Shade and water misting effects on behaviour, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 79:2327–2335Google Scholar
  17. Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly DJ, Imeson A, Liu C, Menzel A, Rawlins S, Root TL, Seguin B, Tryjanowski P (2007) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 79–13Google Scholar
  18. Sackett D, Holmes P, Abbott K, Jephcott S, Barber B (2006) Assessing the economic cost of endemic disease on the profitability of Australian beef cattle and sheep producers-Final Report AHW.087. Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, Nth Sydney NSW 2059Google Scholar
  19. St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G (2003) Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J Dairy Sci 86(E Suppl):E52–E77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thornton P, Herrero M, Freeman A, Mwai O, Rege E, Jones P, McDermott J (2007) Vulnerability, climate change and livestock - research opportunities and challenges for poverty alleviation. SAT eJournal | ejournal.icrisat.org 4:1–23Google Scholar
  21. Tisdell C (2003) Socioeconomic causes of loss of animal genetic diversity: analysis and assessment. Ecol Econ 45:365–377. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00091-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Voh AA Jr, Larbi A, Olorunju SAS, Agyemang K, Abiola BD, Williams TO (2004) Fertility of N’dama and Bunaji cattle to artificial insemination following oestrus synchronization with PRID and PGF2α in the hot humid zone of Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 36:499–511. doi: 10.1023/B:TROP.0000035007.19522.62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. B. Gaughan
    • 1
  • T. L. Mader
    • 2
  • S. M. Holt
    • 3
  • M. L. Sullivan
    • 1
  • G. L. Hahn
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Animal StudiesThe University of QueenslandGattonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of NebraskaConcordUSA
  3. 3.Hubbard Feeds IncMankatoUSA
  4. 4.Biological Systems EngineeringUnited States Meat Animal Research CenterClay CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations