International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 493–503 | Cite as

Gene flow in maize fields with different local pollen densities

  • A. Susana Goggi
  • Higinio Lopez-Sanchez
  • Petrutza Caragea
  • Mark Westgate
  • Raymond Arritt
  • Craig A. Clark
Original Paper


The development of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties as factories of pharmaceutical and industrial compounds has renewed interest in controlling pollen dispersal. The objective of this study was to compare gene flow into maize fields of different local pollen densities under the same environmental conditions. Two fields of approximately 36 ha were planted with a nontransgenic, white hybrid, in Ankeny, Iowa, USA. In the center of both fields, a 1-ha plot of a yellow-seeded stacked RR/Bt transgenic hybrid was planted as a pollen source. Before flowering, the white receiver maize of one field was detasseled in a 4:1 ratio to reduce the local pollen density (RPD). The percentage of outcross in the field with RPD was 42.2%, 6.3%, and 1.3% at 1, 10, and 35 m from the central plot, respectively. The percentage of outcross in the white maize with normal pollen density (NPD) was 30.1%, 2.7%, and 0.4%, respectively, at these distances. At distances greater than 100 m, the outcross frequency decreased below 0.1 and 0.03% in the field with RPD and NPD, respectively. A statistical model was used to compare pollen dispersal based on observed outcross percentages. The likelihood ratio test confirmed that the models of outcrossing in the two fields were significantly different (P is practically 0). Results indicated that when local pollen is low, the incoming pollen has a competitive advantage and the level of outcross is significantly greater than when the local pollen is abundant.


Maize Pollen Dispersion Statistical models 


  1. Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1996) Crop-to-weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S. bicolor. Am J Bot 83:1153–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) (2003) Cultivar purity testing handbook. In: Cultivar Purity Testing Committee Contribution No. 33 to the Handbook on Seed Testing. AOSA, Las Cruces, NM, pp 21–22Google Scholar
  3. Aylor DE, Schultes NP, Shields EJ (2003) An aerobiological framework for assessing cross-pollination in maize. Agric For Meteorol 199:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltazar MB, Sanchez-Gonzalez J de J, de la Cruz-Larios L, Schoper JB (2005) Pollination between maize and teosinte: an important determinant of gene flow in Mexico. Theor Appl Genet 110:519–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassetti P, Westgate ME (1994) Floral asynchrony and kernel set in maize quantified by image analysis. Agron J 86:699–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateman AJ (1947a) Contamination of seed crops. II. Wind pollination. Heredity 1:235–246Google Scholar
  7. Bateman AJ (1947b) Contamination of seed crops. III. Relation with isolation distances. Heredity 1:303–336Google Scholar
  8. Bellon MR, Brush SB (1994) Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Econ Bot 48:196–209Google Scholar
  9. Bellon MR, Risopoulos J (2001) Small-scale farmers expand the benefits of improved maize germplasm: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. World Dev 29:799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biotechnology Industry Organization (2005) Adventitious presence: standards need to be developed for adventitious presence of biotech products. Available at (verified April 29, 2006)
  11. Burris JS (2001) Adventitious pollen intrusion into hybrid maize seed production fields. In: Proceedings of the Corn Sorghum Research Conference, vol 56. American Seed Trade Association, pp 98–115Google Scholar
  12. Castillo Gonzalez F, Goodman MM (1997) Research on gene flow between improved maize and landraces. In: Gene flow among maize landraces, improved maize varieties, and teosinte. Implications for transgenic maize. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F, pp 67–72, available at, (verified April 29, 2006)
  13. Chilcutt CF, Tabashnik BE (2004) Contamination of refuges by Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes from transgenic maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7526–7529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doebley J (2004) The genetics of maize evolution. Annu Rev Genet 38:37–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doering DS (2004) Designing genes. Aiming for safety and sustainability in U.S. agriculture and biotechnology. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998) High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J Hered 89:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellstrand NC (2003) Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1163–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ennos RA (1994) Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity 72:250–259Google Scholar
  19. Eubanks MW (2001) The mysterious origin of maize. Econ Bot 55:492–514Google Scholar
  20. Fonseca AE, Westgate ME, Doyle RT (2002) Application of fluorescence microscopy and image analysis for quantifying dynamics of pollen shed. Crop Sci 42:2201–2206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia C, Figueroa MJ, Gomez MR, Townsend LR, Schoper J (1998) Pollen control during transgenic hybrid maize development in Mexico. Crop Sci 38:1597–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goggi AS, Stahr MG (1997) ROUNDUP™ pre-emergence treatment to determine the presence of the of the RoundUp Ready™ gene in soybean seed: a laboratory test. Seed Technol 19:99–102Google Scholar
  23. Goggi AS, Caragea P, Lopez-Sanchez H, Westgate M, Arritt R, Clark C (2006) Statistical analysis of outcrossing between adjacent maize grain production fields. Field Crops Res (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Hardy OJ, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Freville H, Boquien G, Mignot A, Colas B, Olivieri I (2004) Fine-scale genetic structure and gene disposal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae) I. Pattern of pollen dispersal. J Evol Biol 17:795–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henry CD, Morgan D, Weekes R, Daniels R, Boffey C (2003) Farm scale evaluations of GM crops: monitoring gene flow from GM crops to non GM equivalent crops in the vicinity. Part I: forage maize. Report No. EPG 1/5/138. Available at, (verified April 29, 2006)
  26. Jarosz N, Loubet B, Durand B, McCartney HA, Foueillassar X, Huber L (2003) Field measurements of airborne concentrations and deposition rate of maize pollen (Zea mays L.) downwind of an experimental field plot. Agric For Meteorol 119:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jemison JJ, Vayda ME (2001) Cross pollination from genetically engineered corn: wind transport and seed source. AgBioForum 4:87–92Google Scholar
  28. Jones MD, Brooks JS (1950) Effectiveness of distance and border rows in preventing outcrossing in corn. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin No. T-38, Stillwater, OKGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones MD, Newell LC (1948) Longevity of pollen and stigmas of grasses: buffalograss, Buchloe dactyloides (NUTT) Engelm., and corn, Zea mays L. J Am Soc Agron 40:195–204Google Scholar
  30. Kenta T, Isagi Y, Nakagawa M, Yamashita M, Nakashizuka T (2004) Variation in pollen dispersal between years with different pollination conditions in a tropical emergent tree. Mol Ecol 13:3575–3584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luna VS, Figueroa MJ, Baltasar MB, Gomez LR, Townsend R, Schoper JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci 41:1551–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma BL, Subedi KD, Reid LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci 44:1273–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayr E (1970) The breakdown of isolation mechanisms (hybridization). Population, species, and evolution. In: Population, species, and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  34. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) Seed schemes 2005: rules and directions Maize and Sorghum. 2nd Part Rules and Directions by Seed Scheme (Annexes VI to XII to the Decision). OECD May, 2005. Available at, (verified April 29, 2006)
  36. Paterniani E, Stort AC (1974) Effective maize pollen dispersal in the field. Euphytica 23:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pleasants JM, Hellmich RL, Dively GP, Sears MS, Stanley-Horn DE, Mattila HR, Foster JE, Clark P, Jones JD (2001) Corn pollen deposition on milkweeds in and near corn fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11919–11924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1986) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. R Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at, (verified April 29, 2006)
  40. Raynor GS, Ogden EC, Hayes JV (1972) Dispersion and deposition of corn pollen from experimental sources. Agron J 64:420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Remund KM, Dixon DA, Wrigth DL, Holden RL (2001) Statistical considerations in seed purity testing for transgenic traits. Seed Sci Res 11:101–120Google Scholar
  42. Sears MK, Helmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Impact of Bt maize pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:11937–11942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevens WE, Berberich SA, Sheckell PA, Wiltse CC, Halsey ME, Horak MJ, Dunn DJ (2004) Optimizing pollen confinement in maize grown for regulated products. Crop Sci 44:2146–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2005) User’s guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) dispersión models, vol 2: description of model algorithms. Report No. EPA454/B-95-003bGoogle Scholar
  45. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000) Soil survey of Polk County, Iowa, part I, p 150Google Scholar
  46. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2005) Wind rose data. Available at, (verified April 29, 2006)
  47. Weber DF (1994) Use of maize monosomics for gene localization and dosage studies. In: Freeling M, Walbot V (ed) The maize handbook. Springer, New York Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilkes HG (1970) Teosinte introgresion in the maize of the Nobogame valley. Bot Mus Leaf Harv Univ 22:297–311Google Scholar
  49. Wilkes HG (1977) Hybridization of maize and teosinte, in Mexico and Guatemala and the improvement of maize. Econ Bot 31:254–293Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Susana Goggi
    • 1
  • Higinio Lopez-Sanchez
    • 1
  • Petrutza Caragea
    • 2
  • Mark Westgate
    • 3
  • Raymond Arritt
    • 4
  • Craig A. Clark
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy, 166 Seed Science CenterIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Statistics, Snedecor HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Agronomy, 1577 Agronomy HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.Department of Agronomy, 3009 Agronomy HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations