International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 174–182 | Cite as

Climate controls on valley fever incidence in Kern County, California

Original Article

Abstract

Coccidiodomycosis (valley fever) is a systemic infection caused by inhalation of airborne spores from Coccidioides immitis, a soil-dwelling fungus found in the southwestern United States, parts of Mexico, and Central and South America. Dust storms help disperse C. immitis so risk factors for valley fever include conditions favorable for fungal growth (moist, warm soil) and for aeolian soil erosion (dry soil and strong winds). Here, we analyze and inter-compare the seasonal and inter-annual behavior of valley fever incidence and climate risk factors for the period 1980–2002 in Kern County, California, the US county with highest reported incidence. We find weak but statistically significant links between disease incidence and antecedent climate conditions. Precipitation anomalies 8 and 20 months antecedent explain only up to 4% of monthly variability in subsequent valley fever incidence during the 23 year period tested. This is consistent with previous studies suggesting that C. immitis tolerates hot, dry periods better than competing soil organisms and, as a result, thrives during wet periods following droughts. Furthermore, the relatively small correlation with climate suggests that the causes of valley fever in Kern County could be largely anthropogenic. Seasonal climate predictors of valley fever in Kern County are similar to, but much weaker than, those in Arizona, where previous studies find precipitation explains up to 75% of incidence. Causes for this discrepancy are not yet understood. Higher resolution temporal and spatial monitoring of soil conditions could improve our understanding of climatic antecedents of severe epidemics.

Keywords

Climate and health Modeling Valley fever Coccidiodomycosis Coccidiodes immitis 

References

  1. Alfaro SC, Gaudichet A, Gomes L, Maillé M (1997) Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting. J Geophys Res 102:11239–11249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnato AE, Sanders GD, Owens DK (2001) Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for Coccidiodes immitis. Emerg Infect Dis 7:797–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1994) Update: Coccidiodomycosis—California 1991–1993. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 43:421–423Google Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1996) Coccidiodomycosis—Arizona, 1990–1995. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 45:1069–1073Google Scholar
  5. Chatfield C (2004) The analysis of time series. Texts in statistical science, 6th edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  6. Deresinski SC (1980) History of coccidiodomycosis: “dust to dust”. In: DA Stevens (ed) Coccidiodomycosis. Plenum, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  7. Electric Power Research Institute (2003) Global climate change in California: potential implications for ecosystems, health, and the economy. Consultant Report 500-03-058CF, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Galgiani JN (1999) Coccidiodomycosis: a regional disease of national importance. Ann Intern Med 130:293–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillette DA, Hardebeck E, Parker J (1997) Large-scale variability of wind erosion mass flux rates at Owens Lake 2. Role of roughness change, particle limitation, change of threshold friction velocity, and the Owen effect. J Geophys Res 102:25989–25998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giorgi F, Hewitson B, Christensen J, Hulme M, Storch HV, Whetton P, Jones R, Mearns L, Fu C (2001) Regional climate information - evaluation and projections. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, chapter 10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 585–638Google Scholar
  11. Glantz MH, Katz RW, Nicholls N (eds) (1991) Teleconnections linking worldwide climate anomalies: scientific basis and societal impact. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. Grini A, Zender CS (2004) Roles of saltation, sandblasting, and wind speed variability on mineral dust aerosol size distribution during the Puerto Rican Dust Experiment (PRIDE). J Geophys Res 109:D07202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grini A, Zender CS, Colarco P (2002) Saltation sandblasting behavior during mineral dust aerosol production. Geophys Res Lett 29:1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein LS, Lenihan J, Lunch CK, Neilson RP, Sheridan SC, Verville JH (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12422–12427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hillel D (1982) Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Hugenholtz PG (1957) Climate and coccidiodomycosis. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Coccidiodomycosis, Phoenix, Arizona. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C., pp 136–143Google Scholar
  17. Iversen JD, White BR (1982) Saltation threshold on Earth, Mars, and Venus. Sedimentology 29:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jinadu BA (1995) Valley Fever Task Force report on the control of Coccidioides immitis. Technical Report, Kern County Health Department, Bakersfield, CAGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkland TN, Fierer J (1996) Coccidiodomycosis: a reemerging infectious disease. Emerg Infect Dis 3:192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolivras KN, Comrie AC (2003) Modeling valley fever (coccidiodomycosis) incidence on the basis of climate conditions. Int J Biometeorol 47:87–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolivras KN, Johnson PS, Comrie AC, Yool SR (2001) Environmental variability and coccidiodomycosis (valley fever). Aerobiologia 17:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komatsu K, Vaz V, McRill C, Colman T, Comrie AC, Sigel K, Clark T, Phelan M, Hajjeh R, Park B (2003) Increase in coccidiodomycosis—Arizona, 1998–2001. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52:109–112Google Scholar
  23. Larwood TR (2000) Coccidin skin testing in Kern County, California: decrease in infection rate over 58 years. Clin Infect Dis 30:612–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Maddy KT (1957) Ecological Factors possibly relating to the geographic distribution of Coccidioides immitis. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Coccidiodomycosis, Phoenix, Arizona. Public Health Service, Wahington, D.C., pp 144–157Google Scholar
  25. Maddy KT, Coccoza J (1964) The probable distribution of Coccidioides immitis in Mexico. Bol Of Sanit Panam 44–54Google Scholar
  26. McKenna-Neuman C, Nickling WG (1989) A theoretical and wind tunnel investigation of the effect of capillary water on the entrainment of sediment by wind. Can J Soil Sci 69:79–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pappagianis D (1988) Epidemiology of coccidiodomycosis. In: McGinnis M (ed) Current topics in mycology, vol 2. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 199–238Google Scholar
  28. Pappagianis D, Einstein H (1978) Tempest from Tehachapi takes toll or Coccidiodes conveyed aloft and afar. West J Med 129:527–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Raphael MN (2003) The Santa Ana winds of California, Earth Interact 7:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shao, Y, Lu, H (2000) A simple expression for wind erosion threshold friction velocity. J Geophys Res 105:22437–22443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith CE, Beard RR, Rosenberger HG, Whiting EG (1946) Effect of season and dust control on coccidiodomycosis. J Am Med Assoc 132:833–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zender, CS, Kwon, EY (2005) Regional contrasts in dust emission responses to climate. J Geophys Res 110:D13201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth System ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and GeologyCalifornia State UniversityBakersfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations