Advertisement

Multiple-point statistical simulation of the ore boundaries for a lateritic bauxite deposit

  • Y. DagasanEmail author
  • O. Erten
  • P. Renard
  • J. Straubhaar
  • E. Topal
Original Paper

Abstract

Resource estimation of mineral deposits requires spatial modelling of orebody boundaries based on a set of exploration borehole data. Given lateritic bauxite deposits, the spacing between the boreholes is often determined based on the grade continuity. As a result, the selected drill spacing might not capture the underlying (true) lateral variability apparent in the orebody boundaries. The purpose of this study is to investigate and address the limitations imposed by such problems in lateritic metal deposits through multiple-point statistics (MPS) framework. Rather than relying on a semivariogram model, we obtain the required structural information from the footwall topographies exposed after previous mining operations. The investigation utilising the MPS was carried out using the Direct Sampling (DS) MPS algorithm. Two historical mine areas along with their mined-out surfaces and ground penetrating radar surveys were incorporated as a bivariate training image to perform the MPS simulations. In addition, geostatistical simulations using the Turning Bands method were also performed to make the comparison against the MPS results. The performances were assessed using several statistical indicators including higher-order spatial cumulants. The results have shown that the DS can satisfactorily simulate the orebody boundaries by using prior information from the previously mined-out areas.

Keywords

Multiple-point statistics Direct sampling Bauxite mining Stratified Laterite Geostatistics Resource estimation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ilnur Minniakhmetov and Ryan Goodfellow from the Department of Mining and Materials Engineering of McGill University for providing the hosc software and their kind help.

Supplementary material

477_2019_1660_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (5.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 5719 KB)

References

  1. Abzalov MZ, Bower J (2014) Geology of bauxite deposits and their resource estimation practices. Appl Earth Sci 123(2):118–134Google Scholar
  2. Arpat GB, Caers J (2007) Conditional simulation with patterns. Math Geol 39(2):177–203Google Scholar
  3. Bardossy G, Szabo IR, Varga G (2003) A new method of resource estimation for bauxite and other solid mineral deposits. Berg Und Huttenmannische Monatshefte 148(2):57–64Google Scholar
  4. Bastante FG, Taboada J, Alejano L, Alonso E (2008) Optimization tools and simulation methods for designing and evaluating a mining operation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(6):727–735Google Scholar
  5. Bourassi A, Foucher B, Geffroy F, Marin JY, Martin B, Meric YM, Perseval S, Renard D, Robinot L, Touffait Y, Wagner L (2016) Isatis software user’s guide. Geovariances, Ecole des Mines de Paris, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Dagasan Y (2018) Development of a grade control technique optimizing dilution and ore loss trade-off in lateritic bauxite deposits. PhD Thesis, Curtin University, CurtinGoogle Scholar
  7. Dagasan Y, Erten O, Topal E (2018a) Accounting for a spatial trend in fine-scale ground-penetrating radar data: a comparative case study. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 118(2):173–184Google Scholar
  8. Dagasan Y, Renard P, Straubhaar J, Erten O, Topal E (2018b) Automatic parameter tuning of multiple-point statistical simulations for lateritic bauxite deposits. Minerals 8:220Google Scholar
  9. Dagasan Y, Renard P, Straubhaar J, Erten O, Topal E (2018c) Pilot point optimization of mining boundaries for lateritic metal deposits: Finding the trade-off between dilution and ore loss. Nat Resour Res 28:153–171Google Scholar
  10. Davis JL, Annan AP (1989) Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy 1. Geophys Prospect 37(5):531–551Google Scholar
  11. de Freitas Silva M, Dimitrakopoulos R (2016) Simulation of weathered profiles coupled with multivariate block-support simulation of the puma nickel laterite deposit, brazil. Eng Geol 215:108–121Google Scholar
  12. De Iaco S, Maggio S (2011) Validation techniques for geological patterns simulations based on variogram and multiple-point statistics. Math Geosci 43(4):483–500Google Scholar
  13. Dimitrakopoulos R (1998) Conditional simulation algorithms for modelling orebody uncertainty in open pit optimisation. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ 12(4):173–179Google Scholar
  14. Dimitrakopoulos R, Mustapha H, Gloaguen E (2010) High-order statistics of spatial random fields: exploring spatial cumulants for modeling complex non-gaussian and non-linear phenomena. Math Geosci 42(1):65–99Google Scholar
  15. Erten O (2012) Profiling and mining control to mitigate dilution effect from SiO2 at the base of a bauxite deposit. PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  16. Erten O, Kizil MS, Topal E, McAndrew L (2013) Spatial prediction of lateral variability of a laterite-type bauxite horizon using ancillary ground-penetrating radar data. Nat Resour Res 22(3):207–227Google Scholar
  17. Erten O, McAndrew L, Kizil MS, Topal E (2015) Incorporating fine-scale ground-penetrating radar data into the mapping of lateral variability of a laterite-type bauxite horizon. Min Technol 124(1):1–15Google Scholar
  18. Gloaguen E, Dimitrakopoulos R (2009) Two-dimensional conditional simulations based on the wavelet decomposition of training images. Math Geosci 41(6):679–701Google Scholar
  19. Goodfellow R, Consuegra FA, Dimitrakopoulos R, Lloyd T (2012) Quantifying multi-element and volumetric uncertainty, coleman mccreedy deposit, ontario, canada. Comput Geosci 42:71–78Google Scholar
  20. Guardiano FB, Srivastava RM (1992) Borrowing complex geometries from training images: the extended normal equations algorithm. Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting Report, Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartman HL, Mutmansky JM (2002) Introductory mining engineering. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  22. Honarkhah M, Caers J (2010) Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling. Math Geosci 42(5):487–517Google Scholar
  23. Jones P, Douglas I, Jewbali A (2013) Modeling combined geological and grade uncertainty: application of multiple-point simulation at the apensu gold deposit, ghana. Math Geosci 45(8):949–965Google Scholar
  24. Journel AG (2005) Beyond covariance: the advent of multiple-point geostatistics. Geostat Banff 2004:225–233Google Scholar
  25. Mariethoz G, Caers J (2014) Multiple-point geostatistics: stochastic modeling with training images. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  26. Mariethoz G, Renard P, Straubhaar J (2010) The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resour Res 46(11):1–14Google Scholar
  27. Matheron G (1973) The intrinsic random functions and their applications. Adv Appl Probab 5(3):439–468Google Scholar
  28. Meerschman E, Pirot G, Mariethoz G, Straubhaar J, Van Meirvenne M, Renard P (2013) A practical guide to performing multiple-point statistical simulations with the direct sampling algorithm. Comput Geosci 52:307–324Google Scholar
  29. Mery N, Emery X, Cáceres A, Ribeiro D, Cunha E (2017) Geostatistical modeling of the geological uncertainty in an iron ore deposit. Ore Geol Rev 88:336–351Google Scholar
  30. Osterholt V, Dimitrakopoulos R (2018) Simulation of orebody geology with multiple-point geostatistics—application at yandi channel iron ore deposit, WA, and implications for resource uncertainty. In: Advances in applied strategic mine planning, Springer, New York, pp 335–352Google Scholar
  31. Pasti HA, Costa JFCL, Boucher A (2012) Multiple-point geostatistics for modeling lithological domains at a Brazilian iron ore deposit using the single normal equations simulation algorithm. In: Geostatistics Oslo, Springer, New York, pp 397–407Google Scholar
  32. Pérez C, Mariethoz G, Ortiz JM (2014) Verifying the high-order consistency of training images with data for multiple-point geostatistics. Comput Geosci 70:190–205Google Scholar
  33. Renard D, Bez N, Desassis N, Beucher H, Ors F, Freulon X (2017) RGeostats: geostatistical package. http://cg.ensmp.fr/rgeostats. R package version 11.0.6. Accessed 3 Aug 2017
  34. Rezaee H, Marcotte D (2017) Integration of multiple soft data sets in mps thru multinomial logistic regression: a case study of gas hydrates. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31(7):1727–1745Google Scholar
  35. Rezaee H, Mariethoz G, Koneshloo M, Asghari O (2013) Multiple-point geostatistical simulation using the bunch-pasting direct sampling method. Comput Geosci 54:293–308Google Scholar
  36. Rezaee H, Marcotte D, Tahmasebi P, Saucier A (2015) Multiple-point geostatistical simulation using enriched pattern databases. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(3):893–913Google Scholar
  37. Robles-Stefoni L, Dimitrakopoulos R (2016) Stochastic simulation of the fox kimberlitic diamond pipe, ekati mine, northwest territories, Canada. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 116(2):189–200Google Scholar
  38. Rossi ME, Deutsch CV (2013) Mineral resource estimation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Straubhaar J, Renard P, Mariethoz G, Froidevaux R, Besson O (2011) An improved parallel multiple-point algorithm using a list approach. Math Geosci 43(3):305–328Google Scholar
  40. Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34(1):1–21Google Scholar
  41. Tahmasebi P, Hezarkhani A, Sahimi M (2012) Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions. Comput Geosci 16(3):779–797Google Scholar
  42. van der Grijp Y, Minnitt RCA (2015) Application of direct sampling multi-point statistic and sequential gaussian simulation algorithms for modelling uncertainty in gold deposits. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 115(1):73–85Google Scholar
  43. Zhang T, Yi D, Huang T, Li X (2015) Reconstruction of porous media using multiple-point statistics with data conditioning. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(3):727–738Google Scholar
  44. Zhang T, Switzer P, Journel A (2006) Filter-based classification of training image patterns for spatial simulation. Math Geol 38(1):63–80Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Hydrogeology and GeothermicsUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Western Australian School of MinesCurtin UniversityKalgoorlieAustralia

Personalised recommendations