Joint second-order parameter estimation for spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox processes
We propose a new fitting method to estimate the set of second-order parameters for the class of homogeneous spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox point processes. With simulations, we show that the proposed minimum contrast procedure, based on the spatio-temporal pair correlation function, provides reliable estimates and we compare the results with the current available methods. Moreover, the proposed method can be used in the case of both separable and non-separable parametric specifications of the correlation function of the underlying Gaussian Random Field. We describe earthquake sequences comparing several Cox model specifications.
KeywordsEarthquakes Log-Gaussian Cox processes Minimum contrast method Non-separable covariance function Spatio-temporal pair correlation function
We would like to thank the Associate Editor and the two anonymous Referees for their suggestions and comments, that considerably improved the manuscript. This paper has been supported by the national grant of the Italian Ministry of Education University and Research (MIUR) for the PRIN-2015 program (Progetti di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale), “Prot. 20157PRZC4— Research Project Title Complex space-time modeling and functional analysis for probabilistic forecast of seismic events. PI: Giada Adelfio”. J. Mateu has been partially founded by Grants P1-1B2015-40 and MTM2016-78917-R.
- Cox DR (1955) Some statistical methods connected with series of events. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 17(2):129–164Google Scholar
- Diggle PJ (2007) Spatio-temporal point processes: methods and applications. In: Finkenstadt B, Held L, Isham V (eds) Statistical methods for spatio-temporal systems. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 107. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, pp 1–45Google Scholar
- Gneiting T, Genton MG, Guttorp P (2006) Geostatistical space-time models, stationarity, separability, and full symmetry. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 107. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, p 151Google Scholar
- Hawkes A, Adamopoulos L (1973) Cluster models for erthquakes-regional comparison. Bull Int Stat Inst 45(3):454–461Google Scholar
- Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
- Sheather SJ, Jones MC (1991) A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 53(3):683–690Google Scholar
- Siino M, D’Alessandro A, Adelfio G, Scudero S, Chiodi M (2018) Multiscale processes to describe the eastern sicily seismic sequences. Ann Geophys 61(2). https://doi.org/10.441/ag-7711
- Wand M (2015) KernSmooth: functions for Kernel smoothing supporting Wand & Jones (1995). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=KernSmooth, r package version 2.23-15