Three-dimensional analysis of ozone and PM2.5 distributions obtained by observations of tethered balloon and unmanned aerial vehicle in Shanghai, China
- 225 Downloads
A lightweight unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and a tethered balloon platform were jointly used to investigate three-dimensional distributions of ozone and PM2.5 concentrations within the lower troposphere (1000 m) at a localized coastal area in Shanghai, China. Eight tethered balloon soundings and three UAV flights were conducted on May 25, 2016. Generalized additive models (GAMs) were used to quantitatively describe the relationships between air pollutants and other obtained parameters. Field observations showed that large variations were captured both in the vertical and horizontal distributions of ozone and PM2.5 concentrations. Significant stratified layers of ozone and PM2.5 concentrations as well as wind directions were observed throughout the day. Estimated bulk Richardson numbers indicate that the vertical mixing of air masses within the lower troposphere were heavily suppressed throughout the day, leading to much higher concentrations of ozone and PM2.5 in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). The NO and NO2 concentrations in the experimental field were much lower than that in the urban area of Shanghai and demonstrated totally different vertical distribution patterns from that of ozone and PM2.5. This indicates that aged air masses of different sources were transported to the experimental field at different heights. Results derived from the GAMs showed that the aggregate impact of the selected variables for the vertical variations can explain 94.3% of the variance in ozone and 94.5% in PM2.5. Air temperature, relative humidity and atmospheric pressure had the strongest effects on the variations of ozone and PM2.5. As for the horizontal variations, the GAMs can explain 56.3% of the variance in ozone and 57.6% in PM2.5. The strongest effect on ozone was related to air temperature, while PM2.5 was related to relative humidity. The output of GAMs also implied that fine aerosol particles were in the stage of growth in the experimental field, which is different from ozone (aged air parcels of ozone). Geographical parameters influenced the horizontal variations of ozone and PM2.5 concentrations by changing underlying surface types. The differences of thermodynamic properties between land and sea resulted in quick changes of PBL height, air temperature and dew point over the coastal area, which was linked to the extent of vertical mixing at different locations. The results of GAMs can be used to analyze the sources and formation mechanisms of ozone and PM2.5 pollutions at a localized area.
KeywordsUAS Air pollution Generalized additive model Lower tropospheric ozone Fine aerosol particles
This study was Funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC0200500), the Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau (No. 2014-8) and the National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science (No. 16ZDA048). We express our sincere appreciation to the Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Zhejiang Province for their help in flying the UAV. We are very grateful for the help from No. 38 institute of China Electronics Technology Group Company in operating the tethered balloon platform.
- Aruffo E, Carlo PD, Dari-Salisburgo C, Biancofiore F, Giammaria F, Busilacchio M, Lee J, Moller S, Hopkins J, Punjabi S, Bauguitte S, O’Sullivan D, Percival C, Breton ML, Muller J, Jones R, Forster G, Reeves C, Heard D, Walker H, Ingham T, Vaughan S, Stone D (2014) Aircraft observations of the lower troposphere above a megacity: alkyl nitrate and O3 chemistry. Atmos Environ 94:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Castelluccio DM, Cisbani E, Frullani S (2007) SNIFFER system: a multipurpose aerial platform for large area radiological surveillance, emergency management and air pollution monitoring. Rep Natl Inst Health Rapporti ISTISAN 7:33Google Scholar
- Ding AJ, Wang T, Xue LK, Gao J, Stohl A, Lei H, Jin D, Ren Y, Wang X, Wei X, Qi Y, Liu J, Zhang X (2009) Transport of north China air pollution by midlatitude cyclones: case study of aircraft measurements in summer 2007. J Geophys Res Atmos 114:D08304Google Scholar
- Emmons LK, Deeter MN, Gille JC, Edwards DP, Attié J-L, Warner J, Ziskin D, Francis G, Khattatov B, Yudin V, Lamarque J-F, Ho S-P, Mao D, Chen JS, Drummond J, Novelli P, Sachse G, Coffey MT, Hannigan JW, Gerbig C, Kawakami S, Kondo Y, Takegawa N, Schlager H, Baehr J, Ziereis H (2004) Validation of measurements of pollution in the troposphere (MOPITT) CO retrievals with aircraft in situ profiles. J Geophys Res Atmos 109:D03309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ganguly ND (2009) Surface ozone pollution during the festival of Diwali, New Delhi, India. Earth Sci India 2(2):224–229Google Scholar
- Haas P, Balistreri C, Pontelandolfo P, Triscone G, Pekoz H, Pignatiello A (2014) Development of an unmanned aerial vehicle UAV for air quality measurements in urban areas In: Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Atlanta, GA, USA pp 16–20Google Scholar
- Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 43Google Scholar
- Illingworth S, Allen G, Percival C, Hollingsworth P, Gallagher M, Ricketts H, Hayes H, Ładosz P, Crawley D, Roberts G (2014) Measurement of boundary layer ozone concentrations on-board a Skywalker unmanned aerial vehicle. Atmos Sci Lett 15(4):252–258Google Scholar
- Knapp KG, Jensen ML, Balsley BB, Bognar JA, Oltmans SJ, Smith TW, Birks JW (1998) Vertical profiling using a complementary kite and tethered balloon platform at Ferryland Downs, Newfoundland, Canada: observation of a dry, ozone-rich plume in the free troposphere. J Geophys Res Atmos 103:13389–13397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McKee DJ (1994) Tropospheric ozone United States. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Yerramilli A, Challa VS, Indracanti J, Dasari H, Baham J, Patrick C, Young J, Hughes R, White LD, Hardy MG, Swanier S (2008) Some observational and modeling studies of the atmospheric boundary layer at Mississippi Gulf Coast for air pollution dispersion assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 5(5):484–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar