Quantifying the added value of climate information in a spatio-temporal dengue model
- 645 Downloads
Dengue is the world’s most important vector-borne viral disease. The dengue mosquito and virus are sensitive to climate variability and change. Temperature, humidity and precipitation influence mosquito biology, abundance and habitat, and the virus replication speed. In this study, we develop a modelling procedure to quantify the added value of including climate information in a dengue model for the 76 provinces of Thailand, from 1982–2013. We first developed a seasonal-spatial model, to account for dependency structures from 1 month to the next and between provinces. We then tested precipitation and temperature variables at varying time lags, using linear and nonlinear functional forms, to determine an optimum combination of time lags to describe dengue relative risk. Model parameters were estimated using integrated nested Laplace approximation. This approach provides a novel opportunity to perform model selection in a Bayesian framework, while accounting for underlying spatial and temporal dependency structures and linear or nonlinear functional forms. We quantified the additional variation explained by interannual climate variations, above that provided by the seasonal-spatial model. Overall, an additional 8 % of the variance in dengue relative risk can be explained by accounting for interannual variations in precipitation and temperature in the previous month. The inclusion of nonlinear functions of climate in the model framework improved the model for 79 % of the provinces. Therefore, climate forecast information could significantly contribute to a national dengue early warning system in Thailand.
KeywordsDengue Climate Spatio-temporal model Random effects Nonlinear
The research leading to these results has received funding from the DENFREE project (Grant Agreement No. 282378) funded by the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Research Programme. RL is grateful to the STEPHI project, Daniel Simpson and Harvard Rue for valuable training and technical support in using the R-INLA package.
Conflict of interest
We declare no competing interests.
- Aguiar M, Paul R, Sakuntabhai A, Stollenwerk N (2014) Are we modelling the correct dataset? Minimizing false predictions for dengue fever in Thailand. Epidemiol Infect 142(11):2447–2459. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813003348
- Anantapreecha S, Sa-ngasang A, Sawanpanyalert P, Kurane I (2004) Annual changes of predominant dengue virus serotypes in six regional hospitals in Thailand from 1999 to 2002. Dengue Bull 28:1–6Google Scholar
- Bi P, Tong S, Donald K, Parton KA, Hobbs J (2001) Climate variability and the dengue outbreak in Townsville, Queensland, 1992–1993. Environ Health 1:54Google Scholar
- Christophers S (1960) Aedes aegypti. The yellow fever mosquito. Its life history, bionomics and structure. Cambridge University Press, London, p 738Google Scholar
- Endy TP, Anderson KB, Nisalak A, Yoon I-K, Green S, Rothman AL, Thomas SJ, Jarman RG, Libraty DH, Gibbons RV (2011) Determinants of inapparent and symptomatic dengue infection in a prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- García C, García L, Espinosa-Carreón L, Ley C (2011) Abundancia y distribución de Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) y dispersión del dengue en Guasave Sinaloa México. Rev Biol Trop 59:1609–1619Google Scholar
- Gubler DJ (1998) Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:480–496Google Scholar
- Hayes JM, García-Rivera E, Flores-Reyna R, Suárez-Rangel G, Rodríguez-Mata T, Coto-Portillo R, Baltrons-Orellana R, Mendoza-Rodriguez E, DE Garay BF, Jubis-Estrada J et al (2003) Risk factors for infection during a severe dengue outbreak in El Salvador in 2000. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69:629–633Google Scholar
- Kramer M (2005). R2 statistics for mixed models. In: Proceedings of the conference on applied statistics in agriculture, pp. 148–160Google Scholar
- Magee L (1990) R 2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. Am Stat 44:250–253Google Scholar
- Muttitanon W, Kongthong P, Kongkanon C, Yoksan S, Nitatpattana N, Gonzales J, Barbazan P (2004) Spatial and temporal dynamics of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever epidemics, Nakhon Pathom province, Thailand, 1997–2001. Dengue Bull 28:35–43Google Scholar
- Reiter P (2014) Surveillance and control of urban dengue vectors. In: Gubler DJ, Ooi EE, Vasudevan S, Farrar J (eds) Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 481–518Google Scholar
- Sabin AB (1952) Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1:30–50Google Scholar
- Townson H, Nathan M, Zaim M, Guillet P, Manga L, Bos R, Kindhauser M (2005) Exploiting the potential of vector control for disease prevention. Bull World Health Organ 83:942–947Google Scholar
- Watts D, Burke D, Harrison B, Whitmire R, Nisalak A (1987) Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of Aedes aegypti for dengue 2 virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 36:143–152Google Scholar