A comparison of methods for spatial relative risk mapping of human neural tube defects

Original Paper

Abstract

Birth defects are a major cause of infant mortality and disability in many parts of the world. Yet the etiology of neural tube defects (NTDs), the most common types of birth defects, is still unknown. The construction and analysis of maps of disease incidence data can help explain the geographical distribution of NTDs and can point to possible environmental causes of these birth defects. We compared two methods of mapping spatial relative risk of NTDs: (1) hierarchical Bayesian model, and (2) Spatial filtering method. Heshun county, which has the highest rate of NTDs in China, was selected as the region of interest. Both methods were used to produce a risk map of NTDs for rural Heshun for 1998–2001. Hierarchical Bayesian model estimated the relative risk for any given village in Heshun by “borrowing” strength from other villages in the study region. It did not remove all the random spatial noise in the rude disease rate. There were several areas of high incidence scattered around its risk map with no readily apparent pattern. The spatial filtering method calculated the relative risk for all villages based on a series of circulars. The risk map from the spatial filtering method revealed some spatial clusters of NTDs in Heshun. These two methods differed in their ability to map the spatial relative risk of NTDs. Distributional assumption of relative risk and the target of the risk assessment should be taken into consideration when choosing which method to use.

Keywords

Neural-tube birth defects Hierarchical Bayesian model Spatial filtering method Risk mapping 

References

  1. Anselin L, Lozano N, Koschinsky J (2006) Rate transformations and smoothing. Report of spatial analysis laboratory. http://www.sal.uiuc.edu/stuff/stuff-sum/pdf/smoothing_06.pdf
  2. Bai HX, Ge Y, Wang JF, Liao YL (2010) Using rough set theory to identify villages affected by birth defects: the example of Heshun, Shanxi, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(4):559–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berke O (2005) Exploratory spatial relative risk mapping. Prev Vet Med 71:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besag JE, Green PJ, Higdon DM, Mengersen KL (1995) Bayesian computation and stochastic systems (with discussion). Stat Sci 10:3–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canales RA, Leckie JO (2007) Application of a stochastic model to estimate children’s short-term residential exposure to lead. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:737–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmona RH (2005) The global challenges of birth defects and disabilities. Lancet 366:1142–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrat F, Valleron AJ (1992) Epidemiologic mapping using the “Kriging” method: application to an influenza-like epidemic in France. Am J Epidemiol 135(11):1293–1300Google Scholar
  8. Christakos G, Bogaert P, Serre ML (2002) Temporal GIS. With CD-ROM. Springer-Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Cressie N, Buxton BE, Calder CA, Craigmile PF, Dong C, McMillan NJ, Morara M, Santner TJ, Wang K, Young G, Zhang J (2007) From sources to biomarkers: a hierarchical Bayesian approach for human exposure modeling. J Stat Plan Inference 137:3361–3379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demichelis F, Magni P, Piergiorgi P, Rubin MA, Bellazzi R (2006) A hierarchical Naïve Bayes model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays. BMC Bioinform 7:514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esra O, Bryan LW, Su YK, Melina SM (2005) Comparison of spatial scan statistic and spatial filtering in estimating low birth weight clusters. Int J Health Geogr 4:19Google Scholar
  12. Frey L, Hauser WA (2003) Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia 44:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gu X, Lin LM, Zheng XY, Zhang T, Song XM, Wang JF, Li XH, Li PZ, Chen G, Wu JL, Wu LH, Liu JF (2007) High prevalence of NTDs in Shanxi province: a combined epidemiological approach. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 79:702–707Google Scholar
  14. Haining R (2003) Hierarchical Bayesian models. In: Haining R (ed) Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemmi I (2008) Bayesian estimation of the incidence rate in birth defects monitoring. Congenit Anom 28(2):103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ismaila AS, Canty A, Thabane L (2007) Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches in modeling risk of preterm birth near the Sydney Tar Ponds, Nova Scotia, Canada. BMC Med Res Method 7:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Z, Gorman DM, Horel S (2006a) Hierarchical Bayesian spatial models for alcohol availability, drug “hot spots” and violent crime. Int J Health Geogr 5:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li ZW, Ren AG, Zhang L, Guo ZY, Li Z (2006b) A population-based case-control study of risk factors for neural tube defects in four high-prevalence areas of Shanxi province, China. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liao YL, Wang JF, Li XH, Guo YQ, Zheng XY (2009) Identifying environmental risk factors for human neural tube defects before and after folic acid supplementation. BMC Public Health 9:391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maiti T (1998) Hierarchical Bayes estimation of mortality rates for disease mapping. J Stat Plan Inference 69:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mollie A (1995) Bayesian mapping of disease. In: Gilks W, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D (eds) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Champman and Hall, London, pp 359–379Google Scholar
  22. Rushton G, Lolonis P (1996) Exploratory spatial analysis of birth defect rates in an urban population. Stat Med 15:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sankoh OA, Berke O, Simboro S, Becher H (2002) Bayesian and GIS mapping of childhood mortality in rural Burkina Faso. Control of tropical infectious diseases. Uni-Heidelberg discussion paperGoogle Scholar
  24. Short M, Carlin BP, Bushhouse S (2002) Using hierarchical spatial models for cancer control planning in Minnesota (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13:903–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Staubach C, Schmid V, Knorr-Held L, Ziller M (2002) A Bayesian model for spatial wildlife disease prevalence data. Prev Vet Med 56:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Talbot TO, Kulldorff M, Forand SP, Haley VB (2000) Evaluation of spatial filters to create smoothed maps of health data. Stat Med 19(17–18):2399–2408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang JF, Li XH, Christakos G, Liao YL, Zhang T, Gu X, Zheng XY (2010) Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(1):107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiwanitkit V (2008) Estimating cancer risk due to benzene exposure in some urban areas in Bangkok. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:135–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu JL, Wang JF, Meng B, Chen G, Pang LH, Song XM, Zhang KL, Zhang T, Zheng XY (2004) Exploratory spatial data analysis for the identification of risk factors to birth defects. BMC Public Health 4:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Population ResearchPeking UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Geoscience and Surveying EngineeringChina University of Mining and TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations