Quantifying water vulnerability: a multi-dimensional approach

Article

Abstract

In today’s uncertain world, vulnerability of water supplies is of increasing concern. A number of factors influence this, ranging from physical conditions through to human management capacities. Across the Orange River Basin in southern Africa, these threats arise from overpopulation and farming pressure, with agrochemical and industrial runoff as well as harsh weather conditions giving rise to severe problems of erosion and land degradation. Under conditions of climate change, these threats are exacerbated, as temperature rises and water resources become more erratic. Since water is both an essential instrument of livelihood support and a crucial factor of production, there is a need to develop more effective mechanisms to identify those areas where its scarcity or poor management can bring about a slowdown in the development process. This urgency is heightened by the international commitment to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), supposedly to be reached by 2015. In addition to the MDGs, governments are also committed to the development of basin management plans for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). This means that, in order to try to allocate water in an equitable and efficient way, better understanding is needed of all of the complexities of managing water across heterogeneous basins. It is now recognized that effective water management is much more dependent on effective governance than on hydrologic regimes. Ranging from traditional local customary norms and practices dating back through generations to the latest state-of-the-art science-based international agreements, water governance is a key to supporting the lives and livelihoods of local populations. Access to information is an essential feature of any of these approaches, and harmonization of data on water issues is long overdue. This paper provides an outline of an index-based methodology on which an assessment of water vulnerability can be made. In this approach, supply-driven vulnerability (from water systems) and the demand-driven vulnerability (from water users), are evaluated at the municipal scale. By combining these various dimensions together mathematically, a Water Vulnerability Index (WVI) can be generated.

Keywords

Water vulnerability Integrated Water Resources Management Water governance Municipalities Water Poverty Index Climate Vulnerability Index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the European Union NeWater Project ‘New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty’ (contract no. 511179GOCE). The results shown here do not reflect the views of the European Union, and are solely the responsibility of the author. Important contributions to this work have been made by Nicci Diederichs, Myles Mander, Alta Drayer, and Chris Dickens. Assistance with the mapping has been provided by Sumith Pathirana.

References

  1. Adger WN et al (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  2. Buma J, Sullivan CA, Neno K, Griffioen J (2007) Can water stressed regions be characterised when there is sparse data? In: Reducing the vulnerability of societies to water related risks at the basin scale. Proceedings of the third international symposium on integrated water resources management, Bochum, Germany, Sept 2006. IAHS Publ. 317Google Scholar
  3. Connolly C, Chisholm M (1999) The use of indicators for targeting public expenditure: the index of local deprivation. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 17:463–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diederichs N, Van Niekerk M, Mander M, Dreyer A (2008) Study report: Newater water vulnerability index. Futureworks! DurbanGoogle Scholar
  5. GWP (2006) Setting the stage for change. GWP, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  6. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Knoesen D (2009) Integrating hydrological hazards and climate change as a tool for adaptive water resources management in the Orange River Catchment. PhD thesis, University of KwaZulu NatalGoogle Scholar
  8. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Molina JL, Bromley J, García-Aróstegui JL, Sullivan CA, Benavente J (2010) Integrated water resources management of overexploited hydrogeological systems using Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks. Environ Model Softw 25(4):383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morin A (2005) The Canadian water sustainability index (CWSI) (PRI working paper series no. 11). Policy Research Initiative, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. PRI Canada (2007) The Canadian water sustainability index. Project report, Policy Research Initiative, Government of Canada, OttowaGoogle Scholar
  14. Romero A (2007) Perceptions of vulnerability of water supplies and water users in the Upper Orange Basin, South Africa. MSc dissertation, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Satterthwaite D (2003) The links between poverty and the environment in urban areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 590:73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Senior M (2002) Deprivation indicators. In: Rees P, Martin D (eds) The census data system. Wiley, Chichester, pp 123–139Google Scholar
  18. Sullivan CA (2001) The potential for calculating a meaningful water poverty index. Water Int 26:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR (2005) Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated indicator approach: the example of the climate vulnerability index. Water Sci Technol (Spec Issue Clim Change) 51(5):69–78Google Scholar
  20. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR (2007) Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: addressing water problems at different scales. J Water Resour Manag 21:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR, Fediw T (2002) Developing and testing the water poverty index: phase 1 final report. Report to Department for International Development, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR, Giacomello AM, Fediw T, Lawrence P, Samad M, Mlote S, Hutton C, Allan JA, Schulze RE, Dlamini DJM, Cosgrove W, Delli Priscoli J, Gleick P, Smout I, Cobbing J, Calow R, Hunt C, Hussain A, Acreman MC, King J, Malomo S, Tate EL, O’Regan D, Milner S, Steyl I (2003) The water poverty index: development and application at the community scale. Nat Resour 27:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sullivan CA, Vörösmarty C, Bunn S, Cline S, Heidecke C, Storygard A, Proussevitch A, Douglas E, Bossio D, Günther D, Giacomello AM, O’Regan DP, Meigh JR (2006) Mapping the links between water, poverty and food security. GWSP working paper no. 1, BonnGoogle Scholar
  24. Sullivan CA, Deiderichs N, Mander M (2008) Assessing water vulnerability in the Orange River Basin in South Africa. Newater technical report, Oxford University, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Sullivan CA, Dickens C, Mander M, Bonjean M, Macfarlane D, Bharwani S, Matin N, van Nieukerk K, Diederichs N, Taylor A, Shale M, King-Okumu C, Kranz N, Bisaro S, Zabala A, Romero A, Huntjens P, Knoesen D (2010) Promoting adaptive water management in the Orange Senqu River Basin: a NeWater case study. In: Mysiak J, Henrikson HJ, Sullivan CA, Bromley J, Pahl-Wostl C (eds) The adaptive water resource management handbook. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, Mccarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Ecklley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2003) Human development report 2003. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. UNECE Economic Commission for Europe (2009) Guidance on water and adaptation to climate change. UNECE, Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, United Nations Publication. ISBN: 978-92-1-117010-8Google Scholar
  29. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) Global environment outlook 3: past, present and future perspectives (GEO-3). Earthscan Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Vorosmarty CJ, Green PA, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. World Bank (2002) World development report. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. World Bank (2009) Water and climate change: understanding the risks and making climate-smart investment decisions. World Bank, 52911, authors: Alavian V, Qaddumi HM, Dickson E, Diez SM, Danilenko AV, Hirji RF, Puz G, Pizarro C, Jacobsen M, Blankespoor B, Sept 2009Google Scholar
  33. World Resources Institute (2000) World Resources Institute: 2000, World Resources 2000–2001—people and ecosystems: the fraying web of life. World Resources Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. WSSD (2002) World summit on sustainable development plan of implementation. WSSD, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and ManagementSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  2. 2.School of Geography and the EnvironmentOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations