GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin province, China

  • Tong Zhijun
  • Zhang JiquanEmail author
  • Liu Xingpeng
Original Paper


Grassland fire disasters have occurred frequently and adversely affected livestock agriculture and social-economic development greatly in the grassland regions of Jilin province, China. Moreover, both the frequency of grassland fire and loss from them are considered to be increasing with the global warming and economic development. This study presents a methodology for risk analysis and assessment of grassland fire disaster, taking western Jilin province as a case study area based on geographic information system (GIS). The composite grassland fire disaster risk index (GFDRI) combined the hazard of grassland fire, the exposure of the region, the vulnerability and emergency response and recovery capability for grassland fire disaster of the region were developed to assess and compare risk of grassland fire disaster in different counties in western Jilin province, China using the natural disaster risk index method (NDRIM), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and weighted comprehensive method (WCM). Then, the risk degree of grassland fire disaster was assessed and regionalized in the western Jilin province, China based on GFDRI by using GIS. It is shown that the most places of western Jilin province were in mediate risk. Zhenlai, Tongyu were in heavy risk. Taobei, Ningjiang, Fuyu were in light risk. The information obtained from interviewing the district official committees in relation to result compiled was statistically evaluated. The GFDRI was developed to be an easily understandable tool that can be used to assess and compare the relative risk of grassland fire disaster in different counties in t western Jilin province, China, and to compare the different relative contributions of various factors, e.g., frequency of grassland fire and quality of emergency evacuation plan. The GFDRI is specifically intend to support local and national government agencies of grassland fire disaster management as they (1) make resource allocation decisions; (2) make high-level planning decisions; and (3) raise public awareness of grassland fire disaster risk, its causes, and ways to manage it.


Grassland fire disaster Grassland fire disaster risk Risk assessment GIS Western Jilin province 



The study is supported by the 15th National Key Scientific and Technological Project under Grant No. 2004BA528B31), the National Key Technology R&D Program of China under Grant No. 2006BAD16B0422.


  1. Bilgili E, Saglam, Bülent (2003) Fire behavior in Maquis fuels in Turkey. For Ecol Manage 184(1–3):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castro FX, Tudela A, Sebastià MT (2003) Modeling moisture content in shrubs to predict fire risk in Catalonia (Spain). Agric For Meteorol 116:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheikh M, Kalifa G, BGoze, Be´nie (2004), Spectral indices and fire behavior simulation for fire risk assessment in savanna ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 91:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fu Z (2001) Research on fire-risk climate zoning and fire management measures on grasslands in inner Mongolia. J Catastrophol 16(3):19–22 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Guo P, Sun G, Zhou D et al (2002) Study on grassland fire behavior. Chin J Appl Ecol 12(5):46–74 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Liu X-p, Zhang X-q (2007) Historical data-based risk assessment of grassland fire of grassland in northern China. J Nat Disasters 16(1):61–66 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Mark AF (2005) The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. For Ecol Manage 211:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rachel AD, Kelly BL (2001) Comparing the hurricane disaster risk of US coastal counties. Nat Hazard Rev 2(3):132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang J (2004) Damage evaluation of agro-meteorological hazards in the maize-growing region of Songliao plain, China: case study of Lishu county of Jilin province. Nat Hazards 31:209–232 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang JQ, Okada N, Hirokazu T (2005) Integrated natural disaster risk management: comprehensive and integrated model and Chinese strategy choice. In: Proceedings of fifth annual IIASA-DPRI forum on integrated natural disaster risk management, pp 115–125Google Scholar
  12. Zhang J, Zhou DW, Wu X et al (2006a) A new perception on risk assessment and risk management of grassland fire disaster. J Basic Sci Eng 14(suppl):56–62Google Scholar
  13. Zhang J, Okada N, Tatano H (2006b) Integrated natural disaster risk management: comprehensive and integrated model and Chinese strategy choice. J Nat Disaster 15(1):76–79 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Zhou DW, Zhang ZS (1996) Grassland inflammation, fire behavior, and fire climate. J Grassland of China 3:74–77Google Scholar
  15. Zhou WQ, Wang SX, Zhou Y et al (2004) Research on prediction of grassland fire danger rating. J Nat Disasters 13(2):75–79 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Natural Disaster Research, College of Urban and Environmental SciencesNortheast Normal UniversityChangchunPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology of Ministry of Education of P. R. ChinaNormal UniversityChangchunPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations