A two-dimensional probabilistic acute human-health risk assessment of insecticide exposure after adult mosquito management

  • Jerome J. SchleierIII
  • Paula A. Macedo
  • Ryan S. Davis
  • Leslie M. Shama
  • Robert K. D. Peterson
Original Paper

Abstract

Ultra-low-volume (ULV) aerosol applications of insecticides are used to manage high densities of adult mosquitoes. We used two-dimensional probabilistic risk assessment methodologies to evaluate three pyrethroid insecticides (phenothrin, resmethrin, and permethrin), pyrethrins, and two organophosphate insecticides (malathion and naled), applied by truck-mounted ULV sprayer. Piperonyl butoxide, a synergist commonly used in pyrethroid and pyrethrins formulations, was also assessed. The objective of our study was to evaluate probabilistically if a deterministic human-health risk assessment of mosquito insecticides was sufficiently conservative to protect human-health. Toddlers and infants were the highest risk groups while adult males were the lowest risk group assessed in this study. Total acute exposure ranged from 0.00003 to 0.0003 mg/kg day−1 for the chemicals and subgroups assessed examining inhalation, dermal, oral, and hand-to-mouth exposure. We used the risk quotient (RQ) method for our risk assessment, which is calculated by dividing the total potential exposure for each subgroup and chemical by its ingestion toxic endpoint value (RfD). Mean RQs ranged from 0.000004 to 0.034 for all subgroups and chemicals, with none exceeding the RQ level of concern. Naled had the highest RQs of any chemical assessed while PBO had the lowest. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the exposure from inhalation and deposition contributed the largest variance to the model output. Results support the findings of previous studies that the risks from adult mosquito management are most likely negligible, and that the human-health deterministic risk assessment is most likely sufficiently conservative.

Keywords

Pest management Risk analysis Ultra-low-volume Pyrethroid Organophosphate 

References

  1. Amweg EL, Weston DP, Johnson CS, You J, Lydy MJ (2006) Effect of piperonyl butoxide on permethrin toxicity in the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1817–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brochu P, Ducre-Robitaille JF, Brodeur J (2006) Physiological daily inhalation rates for free-living individuals aged 2.6 months to 96 years based on doubly labeled water measurements: comparison with time-activity-ventilation and metabolic energy conversion estimates. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12:736–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr WC Jr, Iyer P, Gammon DW (2006) A dietary risk assessment of the pyrethroid insecticide resmethrin associated with its use for West Nile virus mosquito vector control in California. Sci World J 6:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cullen AC, Frey HC (1999) Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Currier M, McNeill M, Campbell D, Newton N, Marr JS, Perry E, Berg SW, Barr DB, Luber GE, Kieszak SM, Rogers HS, Backer SC, Belson MG, Rubin C, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Duprey ZH (2005) Human exposure to mosquito-control pesticides–Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia, 2002 and 2003. MMWR (Morb Mortal Wkly Rep) 54:529–532Google Scholar
  6. Davis RS, Peterson RKD, Macedo PA (2007) An ecological risk assessment for insecticides used in adult mosquito management. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driver J, Ross J, Mihlan G, Lunchick C, Landenberger B (2007) Derivation of single layer clothing penetration factors from the pesticide handlers exposure database. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 49:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fletcher JS, Nellesen JE, Pfleeger TG (1994) Literature review and evaluation of the EPA food-chain (KENAGA) nomogram, an instrument for estimating pesticide residues on plants. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:1383–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey HC, Rhodes DS (1996) Characterizing, simulating, and analyzing variability and uncertainty: an illustration of methods using an air toxics emissions example. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2:762–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ho SS, Brossard D, Scheufele DA (2007) The polls—trends—public reactions to global health threats and infectious diseases. Public Opin Q 71:671–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karpati AM, Perrin MC, Matte T, Leighton J, Schwartz J, Barr RG (2004) Pesticide spraying for West Nile virus control and emergency department asthma visits in New York City, 2000. Environ Health Perspect 112:1183–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knepper RG, Walker ED, Wagner SA, Kamrin MA, Zabik MJ (1996) Deposition of malathion and permethrin on sod grass after single, ultra-low volume applications in a suburban neighborhood in Michigan. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12:45–51Google Scholar
  13. Lofgren CS, Anthony DW, Mount GA (1973) Size of aerosol droplets impinging on mosquitoes as determined with a scanning electron microscope. J Econ Entomol 66:1085–1088Google Scholar
  14. Macedo PA, Peterson RKD, Davis RS (2007) Risk assessments for exposure of deployed military personnel to insecticides and personal protective measures used for disease-vector management. J Toxicol Environ Health A 70:1758–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore JC, Dukes JC, Clark JR, Malone J, Hallmon CF, Hester PG (1993) Downwind drift and deposition of malathion on human targets from ground ultra-low volume mosquito sprays. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 9:138–142Google Scholar
  16. Mount GA (1998) A critical review of ultra low-volume aerosols of insecticide applied with vehicle mounted generators for adult mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 14:305–334Google Scholar
  17. NYCDOH (New York City Department of Health) (2005) Adult mosquito control programs: environmental impact statement (EIS), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Sullivan BCY, Lafleur J, Fridal K, Hormozdi S, Schwartz S, Belt M, Finkel M (2005) The effect of pesticide spraying on the rate and severity of ED asthma. Am J Emerg Med 23:463–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paul EA, Simonin HA, Tomajer TM (2005) A comparison of the toxicity of synergized and technical formulations of permethrin, sumithrin, and resmethrin to trout. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peterson RKD, Macedo PA, Davis RS (2006) A human-health risk assessment for West Nile virus and insecticides used in mosquito management. Environ Health Perspect 114:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Portier K, Tolson JK, Roberts SM (2007) Body weight distributions for risk assessment. Risk Anal 27:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reisen W, Brault AC (2007) West Nile virus in North America: perspectives on epidemiology and intervention. Pest Manag Sci 63:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schleier III JJ, Davis RS, Shama LM, Macedo PA, Peterson RKD (2008a) Equine risk assessment for insecticides used in adult mosquito management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14:392–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schleier III JJ, Peterson RKD, Macedo PA, Brown DA (2008b) Environmental concentrations, fate, and risk assessment of pyrethrins and piperonyl butoxide after aerial ultra-low-volume applications for adult mosquito management. Environ Toxicol Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Suffolk-County (Suffolk County Department of Public Works and Department of Health Services) (2006) Draft generic environmental impact statement. Date accessed: 1 March. http://www.suffolkmosquitocontrolplan.org/tasks/task14.html
  26. Tietze NS, Hester PG, Shaffer KR (1994) Mass recovery of malathion in simulated open field mosquito adulticide tests. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26:473–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tucker JW, Thompson CQ, Wang TC, Lenahan RA (1987) Toxicity of organophosphorous insecticides to estuarine copepods and young fish after field applications. J Fla Anti-Mosq Assoc 58:1–6Google Scholar
  28. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1995) ISCST3. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/tt22.htm#screen
  29. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1997a) Draft: Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for residential exposure assessments. Date Accessed: 14 November 2007. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/trac6a05.pdf
  30. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1997b) Exposure factors handbook, vol I. EPA/600/P-95/002Fa, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  31. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1998) PHED surrogate exposure guide. Estimates of worker exposure from the pesticide handler exposure database version 1.1, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  32. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1999) Aermod v. 1.0. Date accessed: 31 August. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thmodconf.htm#aermod
  33. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2000a) Memorandum from P.A. Deschamp, Health Effects Division to P. Moe, Special Review and Reregistration Division. Malathion: human health risk assessment for the reregistration eligibility decision (RED) document. Case No. 0248, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  34. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2000b) Tox oneliners for Resmethrin, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  35. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2000c) Tox oneliners for sumithrin (phenothrin), Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  36. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2002a) Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook (Interim Report). EPA-600-P-00-002B, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2002b) Interim reregistration eligibility decision for naled. Case No. 0092, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  38. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2005a) Memorandum from B. Davis, Health Effects Division, to C. Rodia, Special Review and Registration. Re: occupational and residential exposure assessment and recommendations for the reregistration elegibility decision (RED) for piperonyl butoxide. PC Code: 067501, DP Barcode: D313107, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  39. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2005b) Memorandum from S.L. Kinard, Health Effects Division, to T. Moriarty, Special Review and Reregistration Division. Malathion: updated revised human health risk assessment for the reregistration eligibility decision document (RED). PC Code: 057701, DP Barcode: D321543, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  40. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2005c) Memorandum from T. Dole, health effects division, to C. O’Connell, Special Review and Registration. Re: Pyrethrins: revised occupational and residential exposure assessment and recommendations for the reregistration eleibility decision (RED). PC Code 109701, Case No. 52645-53-1, DP Barcode D319234, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  41. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2006a) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Malathion. Case No. 0248, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  42. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2006b) Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) for permethrin. Case No. 2510, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  43. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2006c) Reregistration eligibility decision for piperonyl butoxide (PBO). Case No. 2525, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2006d) Reregistration eligibility decision for pyrethrins. Case No. 2580, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2006e) Reregistration eligibility decision for resmethrin. Case No. 0421, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Weidhaas DE, Bowman MC, Mount GA, Lofgren CS, Ford HR (1970) Relationship of minimum lethal dose to optimum size of droplets of insecticides for mosquito control. Mosq News 30:195–200Google Scholar
  47. Xue J, Zartarian V, Moya JF, Natalie, Beamer P, Black K, Tulve N, Shalat S (2007) A meta-analysis of children’s hand-to-mouth frequency data for estimating nondietary ingestion exposure. Risk Anal 27:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerome J. SchleierIII
    • 1
  • Paula A. Macedo
    • 2
  • Ryan S. Davis
    • 3
  • Leslie M. Shama
    • 4
  • Robert K. D. Peterson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Land Resources and Environmental SciencesMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  2. 2.Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control DistrictElk GroveUSA
  3. 3.ICM Ventures Inc.Fort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.RocklinUSA

Personalised recommendations