Spatial rainfall model using a pattern classifier for estimating missing daily rainfall data

Original Paper

Abstract

Missing data in daily rainfall records are very common in water engineering practice. However, they must be replaced by proper estimates to be reliably used in hydrologic models. Presented herein is an effort to develop a new spatial daily rainfall model that is specifically intended to fill in gaps in a daily rainfall dataset. The proposed model is different from a convectional daily rainfall generation scheme in that it takes advantage of concurrent measurements at the nearby sites to increase the accuracy of estimation. The model is based on a two-step approach to handle the occurrence and the amount of daily rainfalls separately. This study tested four neural network classifiers for a rainfall occurrence processor, and two regression techniques for a rainfall amount processor. The test results revealed that a probabilistic neural network approach is preferred for determining the occurrence of daily rainfalls, and a stepwise regression with a log-transformation is recommended for estimating daily rainfall amounts.

Keywords

Daily rainfall model Stochastic process Missing data Pattern classification Neural network 

References

  1. Batista G, Monard MC (2003) An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning. Appl Artif Intell 17(5–6):519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooley WW, Lohnes PR (1971) Multivariate data analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 364Google Scholar
  3. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 39:1–38Google Scholar
  4. Demuth H, Beale M (2000) Neural network toolbox: for use with MATLAB, version 4. The Math Works, MA, pp 846Google Scholar
  5. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley, New York, pp 654Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton LC (1992) Regression with graphics: a second course in applied statistics. Duxbury Press, California, pp 363Google Scholar
  7. Heymsfield GM, Caylor IJ, Shepherd JM, Olson WS, Bidwell SW, Boncyk WC, Ameen S (1996) Structure of Florida thunderstorms using high-altitude aircraft radiometer and radar observations. J Appl Meteorol 35:1736–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lal AMW (2001) Modification of canal flow due to stream-aquifer interaction. J Hydraul Eng 127(7):567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levizzani V, Amorati R, Meneguzzo F (2002) A review of satellite-based rainfall estimation methods. European Commission Project MUSIC Report (EVK1-CT-2000–00058), Bologna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  10. Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables; a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ Modell Softw 15:101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Makhuvha T, Pegram G, Sparks R, Zucchini W (1997) Patching rainfall data using regression methods. 1. Best subset selection, EM and Pseudo-EM methods: theory. J Hydrol 198:308–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Research Council (2003) Satellite observations of the Earth’s environment: accelerating the transition of research to operations. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Pegram G (1997) Patching rainfall data using regression methods. 3. Grouping, patching and outlier detection. J Hydrol 198:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roldán J, Woolhiser DA (1982) Stochastic daily precipitation models: 1. A comparison of occurrence processes. Water Resour Res 18(5):1451–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schneider T (2001) Analysis of incomplete climate data: estimating of mean values and covariance matrices and imputation of missing values. J Clim 14:853–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SFWMD (1999) A primer to the South Florida water management model (Version 3.5). SFWMD, West Palm BeachGoogle Scholar
  17. Srikanthan R, Harrold TI, Sharma A, McMahon TA (2005) Comparison of two approaches for generation of daily rainfall data. Stochas Environ Res Risk Assess 19:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tarboton KC, Neidrauer CJ, Santee ER, Needle JC (1999) Regional hydrologic modeling for planning the management of South Florida’s water resources through 2050. In: Paper presented at 1999 annual international meeting, ASAE/CSAE, Toronto, Canada, 19–21 JulyGoogle Scholar
  19. Wheater HS, Chandler RE, Onof CJ, Isham VS, Bellone E, Yang C, Lekkas D, Lourmas G, Segond ML (2005) Spatial-temporal rainfall modeling for flood risk estimation. Stochas Environ Res Risk Assess 19:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilks DS (1995) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: an introduction. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 467Google Scholar
  21. Wilks DS (1998) Multisite generation of a daily stochastic precipitation generation model. J Hydrol 210:178–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental System EngineeringHanyang UniversityGyeonggi-doKorea
  2. 2.US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O9E3WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations