Advertisement

Space–time clustering of case–control data with residential histories: insights into empirical induction periods, age-specific susceptibility, and calendar year-specific effects

  • Jaymie R. MelikerEmail author
  • Geoffrey M. Jacquez
Original Paper

Abstract

Our research group recently developed Q-statistics for evaluating space–time clustering in case–control studies with residential histories. This technique relies on time-dependent nearest-neighbor relationships to examine clustering at any moment in the life-course of the residential histories of cases relative to that of controls. In addition, in place of the widely used null hypothesis of spatial randomness, each individual’s probability of being a case is based instead on his/her risk factors and covariates. In this paper, we extend this approach to illustrate how alternative temporal orientations (e.g., years prior to diagnosis/recruitment, participant’s age, and calendar year) influence a spatial clustering pattern. These temporal orientations are valuable for shedding light on the duration of time between clustering and subsequent disease development (known as the empirical induction period), and for revealing age-specific susceptibility windows and calendar year-specific effects. An ongoing population-based bladder cancer case–control study is used to demonstrate this approach. Data collection is currently incomplete and therefore no inferences should be drawn; we analyze these data to demonstrate these novel methods. Maps of space–time clustering of bladder cancer cases are presented using different temporal orientations while accounting for covariates and known risk factors. This systematic approach for evaluating space–time clustering has the potential to generate novel hypotheses about environmental risk factors and provides insights into empirical induction periods, age-specific susceptibility, and calendar year-specific effects.

Keywords

GIS STIS Bladder cancer Human mobility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants for taking part in this study. We thank Dr. Jerome Nriagu of the University of Michigan for sharing the bladder cancer case–control dataset. Mr. Andy Kaufmann, Ms. Gillian Avruskin, and Dr. Pierre Goovaerts assisted with software development, database management, and construction of spatial null hypotheses. This research was funded by grants R43CA117171, R01CA096002, and R44CA092807 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Development of the STIS software was funded by grants R43 ES10220 from the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and R01 CA92669 from NCI. The views expressed in this publication are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent those of NCI or NIEHS.

References

  1. Avruskin GA, Jacquez GM, Meliker JR, Slotnick MJ, Kaufmann AM, Nriagu JO (2004) Visualization and exploratory analysis of epidemiologic data using a novel space time information system. Int J Health Geogr 3:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besag J, Newell J (1991) The detection of clusters in rare diseases. J R Stat Soc A Stat 154:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuzick J, Edwards R (1990) Spatial clustering for inhomogeneous populations. J R Stat Soc B Methodol 52:73–104Google Scholar
  4. Goovaerts P, Jacquez GM (2004) Accounting for regional background and population size in the detection of spatial clusters and outliers using geostatistical filtering and spatial neutral models: the case of lung cancer in Long Island, New York. Int J Health Geogr 3:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Pap Reg Sci Assoc 24:7–21Google Scholar
  6. Hahn WC, Counter CM, Lundberg AS, Beijersbergen RL, Brooks MW, Weinberg RA (1999) Creation of human tumor cells with defined genetic elements. Nature 400:464–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han D, Rogerson PA, Nie J, Bonner MR, Vena JE, Vito D, Muti P, Trevisan M, Edge SB, Freudenheim JL (2004) Geographic clustering of residence in early life and subsequent risk of breast cancer (United States). Cancer Cause Control 15:921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Han D, Rogerson PA, Bonner MR, Nie J, Vena JE, Muti P, Trevisan M, Freudenheim JL (2005) Assessing spatio-temporal variability of risk surfaces using residential history data in a case control study of breast cancer. Int J Health Geogr 4:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hornsby K, Egenhofer M (2000) Identity-based change: a foundation for spatio-temporal knowledge representation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacquez GM (1996) Disease cluster statistics for imprecise space–time locations. Stat Med 15:873–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacquez GM (2000) Spatial analysis in epidemiology: nascent science or a failure of GIS? J Geogr Syst 2:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacquez GM (2004) Current practices in the spatial analysis of cancer: flies in the ointment. Int J Health Geogr 3:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacquez GM, Kaufmann A, Meliker J, Goovaerts P, AvRuskin G, Nriagu J (2005) Global, local and focused geographic clustering for case–control data with residential histories. Environ Health 4:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacquez GM, Meliker JR, AvRuskin GA, Goovaerts P, Kaufmann A, Wilson M, Nriagu J (2006) Case–control geographic clustering for residential histories accounting for risk factors and covariates. Int J Health Geogr 5:32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacquez GM, Meliker JR (2007) Case–control clustering for mobile populations. In: Fotheringham S, Rogerson P (eds) Handbook of spatial analysis. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Kulldorff M, Nagarwalla N (1995) Spatial disease clusters: detection and inference. Stat Med 14:799–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kulldorff M, Huang L, Pickle L, Duczmal L (2006) An elliptic spatial scan statistic. Stat Med. doi:10.1002/sim.2490Google Scholar
  18. Meliker JR, Slotnick MJ, AvRuskin GA, Kaufmann A, Jacquez GM, Nriagu JO (2005) Improving exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology: application of spatio-temporal visualization tools. J Geogr Syst 7:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ozonoff A, Webster T, Vieira V, Weinberg J, Ozonoff D, Aschengrau A (2005) Cluster detection methods applied to the Upper Cape Cod cancer data. Environ Health 4:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paulu C, Aschengrau A, Ozonoff D (2002) Exploring associations between residential location and breast cancer incidence in a case–control study. Environ Health Perspect 110:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rothman N (1981) Induction and latent periods. Am J Epidemiol 114:253–259Google Scholar
  22. Sabel CE, Boyle PJ, Loytonen M, Gatrell AC, Jokelainen M, Flowerdew R, Maasilta P (2003) Spatial clustering of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Finland at place of birth and place of death. Am J Epidemiol 157:898–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Silverman D, Morrison A, Devesa S (1996) Bladder cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1156–1179Google Scholar
  24. Sinha G, Mark D (2005) Measuring similarity between geospatial lifelines in studies of environmental health. J Geogr Syst 7:115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tango T, Takahashi K (2005) A flexibly shaped spatial scan statistic for detecting clusters. Int J Health Geogr 4:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Turnbull BW, Iwano EJ, Burnett WS, Howe HL, Clark LC (1990) Monitoring for clusters of disease: application to leukemia incidence in upstate New York. Am J Epidemiol 132:S136–S143Google Scholar
  27. Vieira V, Webster T, Weinberg J, Aschengrau A, Ozonoff D (2005) Spatial analysis of lung, colorectal, and breast cancer on Cape Cod: an application of generalized additive models to case–control data. Environ Health 4:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vogelestien B, Kinzler KW (1993) The multistep nature of cancer. Trends Genet 9:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waller LA, Turnbull BW (1993) The effects of scale on tests for disease clustering. Stat Med 12:1869–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waller LA, Turnbull BW, Gustafsson G, Hjalmars U, Andersson B (1995) Detection and assessment of clusters of disease: an application to nuclear power plant facilities and childhood leukaemia in Sweden. Stat Med 14:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waller LA, Jacquez GM (1995) Disease models implicit in statistical tests of disease clustering. Epidemiology 6:584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BioMedware, Inc.Ann ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public HealthThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations