Numerical approach to Cryptosporidium risk assessment using reliability method

  • Yeonjeong Park
  • Lilit Yeghiazarian
  • Jery R. Stedinger
  • Carlo D. Montemagno
Original Paper
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

A previously developed Cryptosporidium transport model is solved numerically to investigate the transport and interactions between Cryptosporidium, water and surface sediment and to estimate the risk of surface water contamination by Cryptosporidium. The primary objective of this study is to expand the work of Yeghiazarian (Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University 2001)where the analytical solution of the Cryptosporidium transport model was obtained for a simple case of specific attachment of Cryptosporidium oocysts to fine soil particles wherein some parameters have zero values. However, some studies have shown several cases where these parameters are not zero. This necessitated further study to generate a solution to the complete Cryptosporidium transport model. Utilizing the finite difference method, the Cryptosporidium transport model is solved numerically for the general case of a system with any parameter values. Previously, first- and second-order reliability methods (FORM and SORM) were employed for risk assessment using analytical transport results (Yeghiazarian, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 2001), but in this work, FORM and SORM are applied to the numerical solution of the Cryptosporidium transport model to estimate the risk of Cryptosporidium contamination in surface water. The risk of surface water contamination is estimated by the probability that the Cryptosporidium concentration in surface water at a given time and location exceeds a safety threshold. The numerical solution is interfaced with the general-purpose reliability code, CALREL, to estimate the probability of failure on one hillslope. The sensitivity of system reliability to process parameters is reported.

Keywords

Cryptosporidium transport model Risk assessment Surface water contamination Reliability method CALREL 

References

  1. Ang AH-S, Tang WT (1984) Probability concepts in engineering, planning and design, Volume II, Decision risk and reliability. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwill ER (1996) Assessing the link between rangeland cattle and waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum infection in humans. Ranglelands 18(2):48–21Google Scholar
  3. Barwick RS, Mohammed HO, White ME, Bryant RB (2000) Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium muris in soil samples. Biol Fertil Soils 31(5):385–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celia MA, Gray WG (1992) Numerical methods for differential equations: fundamental concepts for scientific and engineering applications. Prentice-Hall, NJ 230–233Google Scholar
  5. Clancy JL, Hasen J (1999) Uses of protozoan monitoring data. J AWWA 91(5):51–25Google Scholar
  6. DuPont HL, Chappell CL, Sterling CR, Okhuysen PC, Rose JB, Jakubowski W (1995) The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers. N Engl J Med 332:855–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eagleson PS (1978) Climate, soil, and vegetation. 2. The distribution of annual precipitation derived from observed storm sequences. Water Resour Res 14(5):713–221Google Scholar
  8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2001) Drinking water criteria document addendum: Cryptosporidium. Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeze RA (1975) A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media. Water Resour Res 11(5):725–241Google Scholar
  10. Garber L, Salmon M, Hurd H, Keefe T, Schlater J (1994) Potential risk factors for Cryptosporidium infection in dairy calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 205(1):86–21Google Scholar
  11. Gerald CF, Wheatley PO (1970) Applied numerical analysis, 4th edition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  12. Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis. Wiley, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamed MM, Conte JP, Bedient PB (1995) Probabilistic screening tool for ground-water contamination assessment. J Environ Eng 121(11):767–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jang Y-S, Sitar N, Der Kiureghian A (1994) Reliability analysis of contaminant transport in saturated porous media. Water Resour Res 30(8):2435–2448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuczynska E, Shelton DR (1999) Method for detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in feces, manures, and soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(7):2820–2826Google Scholar
  16. LeChevallier MW, Norton W, Lee R (1991) Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in surface water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol 57(9):2610–2616Google Scholar
  17. Liu P-L, Lin H-Z, Der Kiureghian A (1989) CALREL user manual.Report No. UCB/SEMM-89/18. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Madore M, Rose J, Gerba C, Arrowood M, Sterling C (1987) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in sewage effluents and selected surface waters. J Parasitol 73(4):702–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC (1986) Methods of structural safety. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  20. Medema GJ, Schets FM, Teunis PFM, Havelaar AH (1998) Sedimentation of free and attached Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(11):4460–2466Google Scholar
  21. Melchers RE (1987) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  22. National Research Council (NRC) (2000) Watershed management for potable water supply: assessing the New York City strategy. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-water erosion prediction project technology. Trans ASAE 32(5):1587–2593Google Scholar
  24. Novotny V, Olem H (1993) Water quality, prevention, identification, and management of diffuse pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Park Y (2003) Numerical approach to Cryptosporidium risk assessment by using the reliability method. Master Thesis. Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  26. Raftery AE, Givens GH, Zeh JE (1995) Inference from a deterministic population dynamics model for Bowhead Whales. J Am Stat Assoc 90:402–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seinwill GD (1993) Bulletin, Cryptosporidium: a waterbourne infectious organism of humans and farm animals, Memorandum, Advisory for State Soil Conservation Staff, Eng Div Soil Conserv Serv, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Sitar N, Cawlfield JD, Der Kiureghian A (1987) First-order reliability approach to stochastic analysis of subsurface flow and contaminant transport. Water Resour Res 23(5):794–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skaggs TH, Barry DA (1997) The first-order reliability method of predicting cumulative mass flux in heterogeneous porous formations. Water Resour Res 33(6):1485–2494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strikwerda JC (1989) Finite difference schemes and partial differential equations. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  31. Thoft-Christensen P, Baker MJ (1982) Structural reliability theory and its applications. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson KD, Stedinger JR, Heath DC (1997) Evaluation and presentation of dam failure and flood risks. J Water Res Plann Manage 123(4):216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker MJ (1998). Methods for detecting and assessing factors influencing transport of oocysts of Cryptosporidium Parvum in soil. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker MJ, Montemagno CD (1999) Sorption of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in aqueous solution to metal oxide and hydrophobic substrates. Environ Sci Technol 33(18):3134–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walker FR, Stedinger JR (1999) Fate and transport model of Cryptosporidium. J Environ Eng 125(4):325–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker MJ, Montemagno CD, Jenkins MB (1998) Source water assessment and nonpoint sources of acutely toxic contaminants: a review of research related to survival and transport of Cryptosporidium parvum. Water Resour Res 34(12):3383–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watanabe ME (1996) New Cryptosporidium testing methods. Environ Sci Technol 30(12):532a–235aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeghiazarian LL (2001) Stochastic approach to modeling the transport of colloidal pollutants in surface water on the micro- and macroscopic scale. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  39. Yeghiazarian LL, Waker MJ, Binning P, Parlange J-Y, Montemagno CD (2006) A combined micro-and macroscopic approach to modeling the transport of pathogenic microorganisms from non-point sources of pollution. Water Resour Res 42(9): Art. No. W09406Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeonjeong Park
    • 1
  • Lilit Yeghiazarian
    • 2
  • Jery R. Stedinger
    • 3
  • Carlo D. Montemagno
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.Dean of Engineering, University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations