, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 193–203 | Cite as

Comparative morphology of in vivo and in vitro laticiferous cells and potential use of in vitro laticifers in early selection of rubber tree clones

  • Deguan Tan
  • Anuwat Kumpeangkeaw
  • Xuepiao Sun
  • Weiguo Li
  • Yiming Zhu
  • Jiaming ZhangEmail author
Original Article


Key message

The laticifer density in callus of young tissue is positively correlated with the rubber yields of adult trees and can serve as an early selection marker to accelerate rubber tree breeding.


The rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) is a perennial crop with a breeding cycle of approximately 30 years in the conventional breeding practices. The lack of suitable parameters linking the juvenile and adult trees has made the early selection attempts inefficient. We performed comparative morphology of laticifer cells in callus induced from young shoots and the primary and secondary laticifers in the trunk of adult trees, and investigated their relationships to rubber yields. Results indicate that the secondary laticifers have smooth lateral walls and perforated end walls and belong to articulated anastomosing laticifers. The primary laticifers are unbranched, non-articulated, and anastomosing, and have bumpy lateral walls when matured. The callus-derived laticifers are morphologically similar to the secondary laticifers with smooth lateral walls and the existence of end walls, and similar relative cell wall thickness. The laticifer density in callus and the laticifer ring number in bark are both genotype-dependent, and they are both highly correlated with the rubber yields with correlation coefficients R = 0.846 (P < 0.002) and R = 0.899 (P < 0.002) for the callus and bark, respectively. Since callus can be induced from tissues of young seedlings in cross-pollinated populations, the laticifer density in callus can serve as an early selection marker of seedlings for high rubber yields and may be used to shorten the rubber tree breeding cycle.


Callus-aided breeding Early selection marker Anastomosing Articulated Non-articultated Laticifer 



This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31471561).

Supplementary material

468_2018_1768_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 KB)


  1. Aguiar ATE, Martins ALM, Gonçalves ECP, Scaloppi Júnior EJ, Branco RBF (2010) Correlations and path analysis in rubber tree clones. Revista Ceres 57:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobilioff W (1919) Investigations concerning the origin of latex vessels and latex in Hevea brasiliensis. Arch v d Rubberc 3:43–46Google Scholar
  3. British Standard (1972) British standard methods of testing natural rubber latices. BS 1672, pp 8–9Google Scholar
  4. Chandrasekhar TR, Marattukalam JG, Mercykutty VC, Priyadarshan PM (2007) Age of yield stabilization and its implications for optimizing selection and shortening breeding cycle in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Euphytica 156:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Gao X, Zhang X, Tian W (2016) Relationship between the number of tapping-induced secondary laticifer lines and rubber yield among Hevea germplasm. Front Agric Sci Eng 3:363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demarco D, de Moraes Castro M, Ascensão L (2013) Two laticifer systems in Sapium haematospermum—new records for Euphorbiaceae. Botany 91:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eschbach JM, Roussel D, van de Sype H, Jacob JL, D’Auzac J (1984) Relationship between yield and clonal physiological characteristics of latex from Hevea brasiliensis. Physiologie Vegetale 22:295–304Google Scholar
  8. Fineran BA (1982) Distribution and organization of non-articulated laticifers in mature tissues of poinsettia. Ann Bot 50:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gomez JB (1982) Anatomy of Hevea and its influence on latex production. Malaysian Rubber Research and Development Board, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo XY, Zhou ZY, Zhan SR (1995) The second validation report of early yield prediction in Hevea brasiliensis. Chin J Trop Agric 15:9–13Google Scholar
  11. Hagel JM, Yeung EC, Facchini PJ (2008) Got milk? The secret life of laticifers. Trends Plant Sci 13:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hao B-Z, Wu J-L (2000) Laticifer differentiation in Hevea brasiliensis: induction by exogenous jasmonic acid and linolenic acid. Ann Bot 85:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huat OS (1981) Correlations between yield, girth and bark thickness of RRIM clone trials. J Rubber Res Inst Malays 29:1–14Google Scholar
  14. Metcalfe CR (1967) Distribution of latex in the plant kingdom. Econ Bot 21:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milanez FR (1946) Nota prévia sobre os laticíferos de Hevea brasiliensis. Arquivos do Serviço Florestal 2:39–65Google Scholar
  16. Milburn JA, Ranasinghe MS (1996) A comparison of methods for studying pressure and solute potentials in xylem and also in phloem laticifers of Hevea brasiliensis. J Exp Bot 47:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nugawela A, Aluthhewage RK (1985) Gas exchange parameters for early selection of Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. J Rubber Res Inst Sri Lanka 1:13–20Google Scholar
  18. Priyadarshan PM, Clement-Demange A (2004) Breeding Hevea rubber: formal and molecular genetics. Adv Genet 52:51–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Regina Lima Gouvêa L, Silva G, Verardi C, Oliveira A, Cristine Piffer Gonçalves E, José Scaloppi-Junior E, Luiz Teixeira de Moraes M, Gonçalves P (2013) Rubber tree early selection for yield stability in time and among locations. Euphytica 191:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rudall PJ (1987) Laticifer in Euphorbiaceae—a conspectus. Bot J 94:143–163Google Scholar
  21. Sreelatha S, Jacob JL, Mercykutty VC, Simon SP, Krishnakumar R (2014) ATP concentration in latex as an indicator for early evaluation of yield in Hevea brasiliensis. Jpn Circ J 48:698–704Google Scholar
  22. Tan D, Sun X, Zhang J (2011) Histochemical and immunohistochemical identification of laticifer cells in callus cultures derived from anthers of Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Cell Rep 30:1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tan D, Sun X, Zhang J (2014) Age-dependent and jasmonic acid-induced laticifer-cell differentiation in anther callus cultures of rubber tree. Planta 240:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tan D, Hu X, Fu L, Kumpeangkeaw A, Ding Z, Sun X, Zhang J (2017) Comparative morphology and transcriptome analysis reveals distinct functions of the primary and secondary laticifer cells in the rubber tree. Sci Rep 7:3126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu ZL, Tan HY, Zeng RZ, Hao BZ (2000) Primary laticifer differentiation of Hevea brasiliensis in relation to shoot growth. Chin J Trop Crops 21:1–6Google Scholar
  26. Wu JL, Hao BZ, Tan HY (2002) Wound-induced laticifer differentiation in Hevea brasiliensis shoots mediated by jasmonic acid. J Rubber Res 5:53–63Google Scholar
  27. Yu J, Zeng X, Yang S, Huang H, Tian W (2008a) Relationship between rate of laticifer differentiation, number of laticifer rows and rubber yield among 1981 irrdb germplasm collections of Hevea brasiliensis. J Rubber Res 11:43–51Google Scholar
  28. Yu JH, Zeng X, Yang SG, Huang HS, Tian WM (2008b) Relationship between rate of laticifer differentiation,number of laticifer rows and rubber yield among 1981 IRRDB germplasm collections of Hevea brasiliensis. J Rubber Res 11:43–51Google Scholar
  29. Zeng X, Hu YS, Huang HS, Fang JL (2006) The evaluation report of 1981’IRRDB rubber tree germplasm—1987-field-planted germplasm. Chin J Trop Crop 27:34–38Google Scholar
  30. Zhao XQ (1987) The significance of the structure of laticifer with relation to the exudation of latex in Hevea brasiliensis. J Nat Rubber Res 2:94–98Google Scholar
  31. Zhou ZY, Guo QY, Zhan SR, Liu JX (1994) Early yield predicting for hevea seedlings from hand-pollination. Chin J Trop Crops 15:1–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, MOA Key Laboratory of Tropical Crops Biology and Genetic ResourcesHainan Bioenergy Center, CATASHaikouChina
  2. 2.Huazhong Agricultural University, International CollegeWuhanChina
  3. 3.Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and CooperativesSong Khla Agricultural Research and Development CentreHad YaiThailand
  4. 4.Rubber Research InstituteChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural SciencesHaikouChina
  5. 5.Baoting Tropical Crops InstituteBaotingChina

Personalised recommendations