The effect of simulated trunk splits, pruning, and cabling on sways of quercus rubra L.
Cabling co-dominant stems at different heights and tensions altered neither frequency nor damping ratio, but the location and proportion of pruned crown mass significantly influenced both frequency and damping ratio.
Amenity trees provide many benefits, but can damage property and injure persons. Arboricultural treatments like pruning and cabling intend to reduce the likelihood of tree failure, but the effect of such treatments on tree sways is not well known. We measured the sway response (frequency and damping ratio) of seven Quercus rubra L. before and after consecutive arboricultural treatments, including the addition a climber swaying freely or secured rigidly to the tree. We also quantified crown architecture and tree mass. Cabling two co-dominant stems did not influence sway response, but pruning increased frequency and decreased damping ratio. The effect of pruning depended on the proportion and location of pruned crown mass. Adding a climber predictably affected frequency and damping ratio in accordance with physical principles. This work adds novel insights to the understanding of tree sways, since previous studies have been limited by single trees, pruning types, or pruning severities.
KeywordsPruning Cabling Frequency Damping ratio
This work would not have been possible without diligent data collection by A. Ahlquist, T. Aronson, T. Beals, D. Burcham, N. Eicholtz, J. Esiason, A. Grove, N. Morrell, M. Palaschak, S. Schunk, J. Sidman, A. Wilkie, S. Zolondick, and Dr. Noel Watkins, and was partially supported by a Summer Scholars grant through the University of Massachusetts Center for Agriculture, Food, and the Environment.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Anonymous (2013) American National Standard for tree care operations—tree, shrub, and other woody plant management—standard practices (supplemental support systems). Tree Care Industry Association, LondonderryGoogle Scholar
- Gilman EF, Grabosky JC, Jones S, Harchick C (2008a) Effects of pruning dose and type on trunk movement in Tropical storm winds. Arbor Urb For 34:13–19Google Scholar
- Gilman EF, Masters F, Grabosky JC (2008b) Pruning affects tree movement in hurricane force wind. Arbor Urb For 34:20–28Google Scholar
- Gilman EF, Miesbauer JW, Masters F (2015) Structural pruning effects on stem and trunk strain in wind. Arbor Urb For 41:3–10Google Scholar
- James KR (2014) A study of branch dynamics on an open-grown tree. Arbor Urb For 40:125–134Google Scholar
- Miesbauer JW, Gilman EF, Giurcanu M (2014) Effects of tree crown structure on dynamic properties of Acer rubrum L. ‘Florida Flame’. Arbor Urb For 40:218–229Google Scholar
- Pavlis M, Kane B, Harris JR, Seiler JR (2008) The effects of pruning on drag and bending moments of shade trees. Arbor Urb For 34:207–215Google Scholar
- Smiley ET, Kane B (2006) The effects of pruning type on wind loading of Acer rubrum. J Arboric 32:33–40Google Scholar
- Smiley ET, Matheny NP, Lilly S (2011) Tree risk assessment. International Society of Arboriculture, ChampaignGoogle Scholar