Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 703–712 | Cite as

Analyzing key factors of roots and soil contributing to tree anchorage of Pinus species

  • Ming Yang
  • Pauline Défossez
  • Frédéric Danjon
  • Thierry Fourcaud
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Root anchorage strength and stiffness can be represented by small number of root and soil parameters. Root morphology represents the majority of these factors.

Abstract

Tree anchorage is a primary function for plant survival which may reach its limit under extreme conditions such as windstorms. To better understand the processes and influential factors underlying tree anchorage, we analyzed the mechanical effects of root morphology and the material properties of roots and soil on the tree-overturning process with the recently developed finite element model RootAnchor. The root system was represented by a simplified 3D root pattern derived from an ensemble average of seven measured root systems of 19-year-old Pinus pinaster grown in sandy spodosol. Soil properties were measured by direct shear tests. Taguchi orthogonal arrays were used to examine the sensitivity of the geometric and material factors of roots and soil to tree anchorage. Tree anchorage was characterized by anchorage strength TMc and anchorage stiffness K0. Using a small number of numerical experiments, the sensitivity analysis prioritized only two key factors contributing to tree anchorage among the 34 factors considered. The results showed root morphological traits that played a dominant role in the material properties of roots and soil in tree anchorage. Taproot depth, the dimensions of the Zone of Rapid Taper (ZRT) and basal diameter of the windward shallow roots were the key factors contributing to TMc (variations > 8%). The dimensions of the taproot, root and soil stiffness, and the basal diameter of the leeward shallow roots were the most active factors for K0 (variations > 10%). These results provide insight into simplified tree anchorage expressions for the prediction of wind-induced uprooting.

Keywords

Tree anchorage Sensitivity analysis Taguchi orthogonal arrays Finite element method Pinus pinaster Root architecture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Aquitaine Region with the FAST-A project, and by the French National Research Agency (ANR) with the TWIST (ANR-13-JS06-0006) and FOR-WIND (ANR-12-AGRO-0007) projects. It was also carried out in the framework of the Cluster of Excellence COTE (ANR-10-LABX-45). We thank Dr. Mark Irvine for his technical aid for the ABAQUS computations. AMAP (Botany and Computational Plant Architecture) is a joint research unit which associates CIRAD (UMR51), CNRS (UMR5120), INRA (UMR931), IRD (2M123), and Montpellier 2 University (UM27); http://amap.cirad.fr/.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Achim A, Nicoll BC (2009) Modelling the anchorage of shallow-rooted trees. Forestry 82:273–284.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augusto L, Achat DL, Bakker MR et al (2015) Biomass and nutrients in tree root systems-sustainable harvesting of an intensively managed Pinus pinaster (Ait.) planted forest. GCB Bioenergy 7:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Autrique L, Lormel C (2008) Numerical design of experiment for sensitivity analysis—application to skin burn injury prediction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(4):1279–1290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnesoeur V, Constant T, Moulia B, Fournier M (2016) Forest trees filter chronic wind-signals to acclimate to high winds. New Phytol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13836 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coutand C, Dupraz C, Jaouen G et al (2008) Mechanical stimuli regulate the allocation of biomass in trees: demonstration with young Prunus avium trees. Ann Bot 101:1421–1432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71:171–188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coutts MP (1986) Components of tree stability in sitka spruce on peaty gley soil. Forestry 59:173–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coutts MP, Nielsen CCN, Nicoll BC (1999) The development of symmetry, rigidity and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant Soil 217:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crook MJ, Ennos AR (1996) The anchorage mechanics of deep rooted larch, Larix europea × L. japonica. J Exp Bot 47(10):1509–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crook MJ, Ennos AR, Banks JR (1997) The function of buttress roots: a comparative study of the anchorage systems of buttressed (Aglaia and Nephelium ramboutan species) and non-buttressed (Mallotus wrayi) tropical trees. J Exp Bot 48:1703–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cucchi V, Meredieu C, Stokes A et al (2004) Root anchorage of inner and edge trees in stands of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) growing in different podzolic soil conditions. Trees 18:460–466.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0330-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert D (2005) Root architecture and wind firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytol 168:387–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Danjon F, Caplan JS, Fortin M, Meredieu C (2013) Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster. Front Plant Sci 4:402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Danquechin Dorval A, Meredieu C, Danjon F (2016) Anchorage failure of young trees in sandy soils is prevented by a rigid central part of the root system with various designs. Ann Bot 118:747–762CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dar FH, Meakin JR, Aspden RM (2002) Statistical methods in finite element analysis. J Biomech 35:1155–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Défossez P, Richard G, Boizard H, O’Sullivan MF (2003) Modeling change in soil compaction due to agricultural traffic as function of soil water content. Geoderma 116:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Iorio A, Lasserre B, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2005) Root system architecture of Quercus pubescens trees growing on different sloping conditions. Ann Bot 95:351–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dupont S (2016) A simple wind–tree interaction model predicting the probability of wind damage at stand level. Agric For Meteorol 224:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupont S, Ikonen VP, Väisänen H, Peltola H (2015a) Predicting tree damage in fragmented landscapes using a wind risk model coupled with an airflow model. Can J For Res 45:1065–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dupont S, Pivato D, Brunet Y (2015b) Wind damage propagation in forests. Agric For Meteorol 214:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant Soil 278:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Lac P, Stokes A (2007) A generic 3D finite element model of tree anchorage integrating soil mechanics and real root system architecture. Am J Bot 94:1506–1514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ennos AR (2000) The mechanics of root anchorage. Adv Bot Res 33:133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fourcaud T, Ji JN, Zhang ZQ, Stokes A (2008) Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: a modelling approach. Ann Bot 101:1267–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm245 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser AI, Gardiner B (1967) Rooting and stability in Sitka spruce. HM Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardiner B, Blennow K, Carnus J-M, Fleischer P (2010) Destructive storms in European forests: past and forthcoming impacts. European Forest Institute, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardiner B, Peltola H, Kellomäki S (2000) Comparison of two models for predicting the critical wind speeds required to damage coniferous trees. Ecol Model 129:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghani MA, Stokes A, Fourcaud T (2009) The effect of root architecture and root loss through trenching on the anchorage of tropical urban trees (Eugenia grandis Wight). Trees 23:197–209.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0269-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hale SE, Gardiner B, Peace A, Nicoll B, Taylor P, Pizzirani S (2015) Comparison and validation of three versions of a forest wind risk model. Environ Model Softw 68:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrington CA, DeBell D (1996) Above- and below-ground characteristics associated with wind toppling in a young Populus plantation. Trees 11:109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009655 Google Scholar
  31. Horn R, Fleige H (2003) A method for assessing the impact of load on mechanical stability and on physical properties of soils. Soil Till Res 73:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horn R, Vossbrink J, Peth S, Becker S (2007) Impact of modern forest vehicles on soil physical properties. For Ecol Manag 248:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James K, Hallam C, Spencer C (2013) Measuring tilt of tree structural root zones under static and wind loading. Agric For Meteorol 168:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jonsson MJ, Foetzki A, Kalberer M, Lundström T, Ammann W, Stöckli V (2006) Root-soil rotation stiffness of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) growing on subalpine forested slopes. Plant Soil 285:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Köstler JN, Brückner E, Bibelriether H (1968) Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Paul Parey, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin CL, Yu JH, Liu HL, Lin CH, Lin YS (2010) Evaluation of contributions of orthodontic mini-screw design factors based on FE analysis and the Taguchi method. J Biomech 43:2174–2181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore JR, Tombleson JD, Turner JA, van der Colff M (2008) Wind effects on juvenile trees: a review with special reference to toppling of radiata pine growing in New Zealand. Forestry 81:377–387.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neild SA, Wood CJ (1999) Estimating stem and root-anchorage flexibility in trees. Tree Physiol 19:141–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicoll BC, Ray D (1996) Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions. Tree Physiol 16:891–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nicoll BC, Gardiner B, Rayner B, Peace AJ (2006) Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Can J For Res 36:1871–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peltola H, Kellomaki S, Vaisanen H, Ikonen V-P (1999) A mechanistic model for assessing the risk of wind and snow damage to single trees and stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch. Rev Can Rech For 29:647–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pivato D, Dupont S, Brunet Y (2014) A simple tree swaying model for forest motion in windstorm conditions. Trees Struct Funct 28:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodriguez M, De Langre E, Moulia B (2008) A scaling law for the effects of architecture and allometry on tree vibration modes suggests a biological tuning to modal compartmentalization. Am J Bot 95:1523–1537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Saffih-Hdadi K, Défossez P, Richard G et al (2009) A method for predicting soil susceptibility to the compaction of surface layers as a function of water content and bulk density. Soil Tillage Res 105:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sellier D, Fourcaud T (2009) Crown structure and wood properties: influence on tree sway and response to high winds. Am J Bot 96:885–896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sellier D, Brunet Y, Fourcaud T (2008) A numerical model of tree aerodynamic response to a turbulent airflow. Forestry 81:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shabani F, Kumar L (2014) Sensitivity analysis of CLIMEX parameters in modeling potential distribution of Phoenix dactylifera L. PloS one 9(4):e94867CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Stokes A (1999) Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different ages and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant Soil 217:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taguchi G (1987) System of experimental design: engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs. UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Telewski FW, Jaffe MJ (1986) Thigmomorphogenesis: field and laboratory studies of Abies fraseri in response to wind or mechanical perturbations. Physiol Plant 66:211–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang M (2014) Ancrage racinaire des arbres: modélisation et analyses numériques des facteurs clés de la résistance au vent du Pinus pinaster (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bordeaux)Google Scholar
  52. Yang M, Défossez P, Danjon F, Fourcaud T (2014) Tree stability under wind: simulating uprooting with root breakage using a finite element method. Ann Bot 114:695–709.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu122 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang M, Défossez P, Danjon F, Dupont S, Fourcaud T (2017) Which root architectural elements contribute the best to anchorage of Pinus species? Insights from in silico experiments. Plant Soil.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2992-0 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISPA, INRA, Bordeaux Sciences AgroVillenave d’OrnonFrance
  2. 2.BIOGECO, INRA, Université de BordeauxCestasFrance
  3. 3.AMAP, CIRAD, CNRS, INRA, IRD, Université de MontpellierMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations