Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 215–229 | Cite as

Genetic variation among pines and spruces in assimilation efficiencies and photosynthetic regulation under elevated CO2

  • John E. MajorEmail author
  • Alex Mosseler
  • John W. Malcolm
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

After 3 years of elevated CO2 treatments, spruce P n regulation from aCO2 to eCO2 was strongly related to total dry mass change (%), whereas pines displayed the same trend, but the relationship was not statistically significant.

Abstract

Assimilation to internal CO2 (AC i ) response curve parameters were grown and quantified under ambient (aCO2) and elevated (eCO2) CO2 treatments for two commercially important tree genera, Pinus and Picea spp. The species include Pinus strobus (WP), P. resinosa (RP), P. banksiana (JP), P. rigida (PP), Picea glauca (WS), P. rubens (RS), P. mariana (BS), and P. abies (NS). Seedlings were 4 years old and dosed for 3 years at the time of measurements. Overall, pines had greater maximum rates of carboxylation (V cmax) and maximum assimilation (A max) values than spruces, and there was a significant downregulation in V cmax and A max for both genera in eCO2, but more so for the spruces. For the maximum rate of electron transport (J max) and the rate of triose phosphate utilization (TPU), there was no significant genus effect, but there was a significant downregulation in eCO2. For these four traits, all spruces downregulated, whereas each pine species responded quite differently. White pine downregulated the most, followed by RP; no change for JP, and PP traits increased under eCO2. At an intermediate CO2 level, net photosynthesis @570 ppm CO2 (P n570) was 13.0% greater for pines and 9.0% lower for spruces under eCO2 compared with aCO2. Comparing responses under eCO2 to aCO2, P n570 was equal for WS but lower for the other spruces; however, WP declined, RP showed no difference, JP had greater P n570, and PP had substantially greater P n570. For pines, there appears to be a consistent enhanced sink effect on P n across all species. Corresponding P n570 change from aCO2 to eCO2 across spruce species showed a strong positive and statistically significant correlation to biomass stimulation that supports the theory of sink regulation of P n .

Keywords

Biochemical efficiency Elevated CO2 Fitness Net photosynthesis Pines Spruces 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge useful comments received from Dr. Guy Larocque. In addition, the biological and technical skills of Debby Barsi, Moira Campbell, and Stephanie West are thankfully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Nelson R, Long SP (2004) Testing the “source–sink” hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated CO2 in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycinie max. Agri For Met 122:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkin OK, Schortemeyer M, McFarlane N, Evans JR (1999) The response of fast- and slow-growing Acacia species to elevated atmospheric CO2: an analysis of the underlying components of relative growth rate. Oecologia 120:544–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer GA, Berntson GM, Bazzaz FA (2001) Regenerating temperate forests under elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition: comparing biochemical and stomatal limitations of photosynthesis. New Phytol 152:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blum BM (1990) Picea rubens Sarg.—Red spruce. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America: Volume 1.Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 250–259Google Scholar
  7. Centritto M, Jarvis PG (1999) Long-term effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and provenance on four clones of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). II. Photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen use efficiency. Tree Physiol 19:807–814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Crous KY, Ellsworth DS (2004) Canopy position affects photosynthetic adjustments to long-term elevated CO2 concentration (FACE) in aging needles in a mature Pinus taeda forest. Tree Physiol 24:961–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crous KY, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (2008) Elevated CO2 concentration affects leaf photosynthesis—nitrogen relationships in Pinus taeda over nine years in FACE. Tree Physiol 28:607–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellsworth DS, Reich PB, Nauburg ES, Koch GW, Kubiske ME, Smith SD (2004) Photosynthesis, carboxylation and leaf nitrogen responses of 16 species to elevated pCO2 across four free-air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Glob Chg Biol 10:2121–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellsworth DS, Thomas R, Crous KY, Palroth S, Ward E, Maier C, Delucia E, Oren R (2012) Elevated CO2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE. Glob Chg Biol 18:223–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghannoum O, Phillips NG, Conroy JP, Smith RA, Attard RD, Woodfield R, Logan BA, Lewis JD, Tissue DT (2010) Exposure to preindustrial, current and future atmospheric CO2 and temperature differentially affects growth and photosynthesis in Eucalyptus. Glob Chg Biol 16:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gower ST, Vogel JG, Norman JM, Kucharik CJ, Steele SJ, Stow TK (1997) Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. J Geophys Res 102:29,029–041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenep H, Turnbull MH, Whitehead D (2003) Response of photosynthesis in second-generation Pinus radiata trees to long-term exposure to elevated carbon dioxide partial pressure. Tree Physiol 23:569–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffin KL, Tissue DT, Turnbull MH, Whitehead D (2000) The onset of photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 partial pressure in field-grown Pinus radiata D. Don. after 4 years. Plant Cell Environ 23:1089–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991) An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2. Reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate re-entry into the chloroplast. Photosyn Res 27:168–178Google Scholar
  18. Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992) Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 15:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison G, Whitney R, Swift E (eds) (1999) Proceedings of the tolerant softwood workshop. Maritime Forest Ranger School, April 13–15, Fredericton, NB. Maritime Forest Ranger School 1350 Regent Street, Fredericton, NBGoogle Scholar
  20. Hattenschwiller S, Korner C (1996) System-level adjustments to elevated CO2 in model spruce ecosystms. Glob Chg Biol 2:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoddinott J, Scott R (1996) The influence of light quality and carbon dioxide enrichment on the growth and physiology of seedlings of three conifer species. II. Physiological responses. Can J Bot 74:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jach ME, Ceulemans R (2000) Effects of season, needle age and elevated atmospheric CO2 on photosynthesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiol 20:145–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnsen KH, Major JE, Loo J, McPhee D (1998) Negative heterosis not apparent in 22-year-old hybrids of Picea mariana and Picea rubens. Can J Bot 76:434–439Google Scholar
  24. Johnsen KH, Flanagan LB, Huber DA, Major JE (1999) Genetic variation in growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Picea mariana: analyses from a half-diallel mating design using field grown trees. Can J For Res 29:1727–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerstiens G (2001) Meta-analysis of the interaction between shade-tolerance, light environment and growth response of woody species to elevated CO2. Acta Oeco 22:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Thiec D, Dixon M (1996) Acclimation of photosynthesis in Norway spruce and red oak grown in open-top chambers and subjected to natural drought and elevated CO2. Can J For Res 26:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindbladh M, Jacobson GL Jr, Schauffler M (2003) The postglacial history of three Picea species in New England, USA. Quatern Res 59:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Little S, Garrett PW (1990) Pinus rigida Mill. – pitch pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 1. Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 456–462Google Scholar
  29. Liu J, Zhou G, Xu Z, Duan H, Li Y, Zhang D (2011) Photosynthesis acclimation, leaf nitrogen concentration, and growth of four tree species over 3 years in response to elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen treatment, in subtropical China. J Soil Sedim 11:1155–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luomala E-M, Laitinen K, Kellomaki S, Vapavuori E (2003) Variable photosynthetic acclimation in consecutive cohorts of Scots pine needles during 3 years of growth at elevated CO2 and elevated temperature. Plant Cell Environ 26:645–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Major JE, Johnsen KH (1996) Family variation in photosynthesis of 22-year-old black spruce: a test of two models of physiological response to water stress. Can J For Res 26:1922–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Major JE, Mosseler A, Barsi DC, Campbell M, Rajora OP (2003) Morphometric, allometric, and developmentally adaptive traits in red spruce and black spruce. II. Seedling and mature tree assessment of controlled intra- and inter-specific hybrids. Can J For Res 33:897–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Major JE, Barsi DC, Mosseler A, Campbell M (2007) Genetic variation and control of chloroplast pigment content in Picea rubens, Picea mariana, and their hybrids. I. Under ambient and elevated CO2 environments. Tree Physiol 27:353–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Major JE, Mosseler A, Barsi DC, Campbell M, Malcolm J (2014) Carbon assimilation variation and control in Picea rubens, Picea mariana, and their hybrids under ambient and elevated CO2. Trees 28:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Major JE, Mosseler A, Johnsen KH, Campbell M, Malcolm J (2015a) Growth, allocation, and physiological relationships in Picea rubens, P. mariana, and their hybrids under ambient and elevated CO2. Can J For Res 45:877–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Major JE, Mosseler A, Johnsen KH, Campbell M, Malcolm J (2015b) Red and black spruce provenance growth and allocation under ambient and elevated CO2. Trees 29:1313–1328Google Scholar
  37. Major JE, Mosseler A, Malcolm JW (2018) Pinus and Picea species growth and allocation under a 2 × 2 factorial of CO2 and soil moisture treatments (in prep)Google Scholar
  38. Mohan JE, Clark JS, Schlesinger WH (2007) Long-term CO2 enrichment of a forest ecosystem: implications for forest regeneration and succession. Ecol Appl 17:1198–1212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nienstaedt H, Zasada JC (1990) Picea glauca (Moench) Voss - White spruce. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America: Volume 1.Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 204–226Google Scholar
  40. Oren R, Ellsworth DS, Johnsen KH et al (2001) Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Parent S, Messier C (1996) A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy. Can J For Res 26:151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul MJ, Foyer CH (2001) Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J Expt Botany 52:1383–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pereira JS (1994) Gas exchange and growth. In: Schulze E-D, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–181Google Scholar
  44. Peters RL (1990) Effects of global warming on forests. For Ecol Manage 35:13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poorter H, Navas ML (2003) Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol 157:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Walters MB, Vanderklein DW, Buschena C (1998) Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Funct Ecol 12:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodoff PO (1990) Pinus resinosa Ait.—red pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 1. Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 442–455Google Scholar
  48. Rogers A, Ellsworth DS (2002) Photosynthetic acclimation of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated pCO2 (FACE). Plant Cell Environ 25:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rudolph TD, Laidly PR (1990) Pinus banksiana Lamb.– jack pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 1. Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 280–293Google Scholar
  50. Schauffler M, Jacobson GL Jr (2002) Persistence of coastal spruce refugia during the Holocene in northern New England, USA, detected by stand-scale pollen stratigraphies. J Ecol 90:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Springer CJ, DeLucia EH, Thomas RB (2005) Relationships between net photosynthesis and foliar nitrogen concentrations in a loblolly pine forest ecosystem grown in elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree Physiol 25:385–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Teskey RO (1997) Combined effects of elevated CO2 and air temperature on carbon assimilation of Pinus taeda trees. Plant Cell Environ 20:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tissue DT, Griffin KL, Ball T (1999) Photosynthetic adjustment in field-grown ponderosa pine trees after six years of exposure to elevated CO2. Tree Physiol 19:221–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB (1998a) Seedlings of five boreal tree species differ in acclimation of net photosynthesis to elevated CO2 and temperature. Tree Physiol 18:715–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB (1998b) Temperature and ontogeny mediate growth response to elevated CO2 in seedlings of five boreal tree species. New Phytol 140:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Urban O, Marek MV (1999) Seasonal changes of selected parameters of CO2 fixation biochemistry of Norway spruce under the long-term impact of elevated CO2. Photosynthetica 36:533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Viereck LA, Johnston WF (1990) Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP - Black spruce. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America: Volume 1.Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 227–237Google Scholar
  58. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wendel GW, Smith HC (1990) Pinus strobus L.—white pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America: Volume 1.Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. US Dept Agric, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 476–488Google Scholar
  60. Wertin TM, McGuire MA, Teskey RO (2010) The influence of elevated temperature, elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and water stress on net photosynthesis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) at northern, central and southern sites in its native range. Glob Chg Biol 16:2089–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Will RE, Teskey RO (1997) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and root restriction on net photosynthesis, water relations and foliar carbohydrate status of loblolly pine seedlings. Tree Physiol 17:655–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wullschleger SD (1993) Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants—a retrospective analysis of A/Ci curves from 109 species. J Exp Bot 44:907–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou Y-M, Han SJ (2005) Photosynthetic response and stomatal behaviour of Pinus koraiensis during the fourth year of exposure to elevated CO2 concentration. Photosynthetica 43:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou Y-M, Wang C-G, Han S-J, Cheng X-B, Li M-H, Fan A-N, Wang X-X (2011) Species-specific and needle age-related responses of photosynthesis in two Pinus species to long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration. Trees 25:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright  2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Major
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alex Mosseler
    • 1
  • John W. Malcolm
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry CentreFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations