Trees

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 1015–1023 | Cite as

Extensively damaged trees tested with acoustic tomography considering tree stability in urban greenery

Original Article
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

Key message

Damaged area of five tree species was determined by acoustic tomography. Final accuracy of 83% was found as satisfactory and proven suitability for overall tree stability assessment.

Abstract

Objectives of study were to assess the accuracy and reliability of the acoustic tomography technique for detecting internal structural defects compared to visual assessment on extensively damaged trees of five species in urban greenery. Tomography was realized by Fakopp 3D acoustic tomograph tool. Several types of structural defects were determined, such as heartwood and sapwood decay, internal and lateral cracks, ring shake and hollow. Acoustic tomography inspection revealed correct detection of damage in all disc samples involved in study. Accuracy of damaged area determination reached 90%. Total accuracy determination for both area and location of damage was 83%. Overestimation of damaged area was observed in eight samples, contrary to seven underestimated samples. Difference in estimated false-positive area in comparison to false-negative area was minimal. Irregularity of cross section shape does not affect the final accuracy of tomograph. Accuracy is not influenced by diameter of tree trunk. We determined strong positive correlation between real area of damage and results of tomography (r = 0.75; p = 0.001). Acoustic tomography provides satisfactory accuracy in damage area determination inside tree trunk and for overall tree stability assessment on even extensively damaged trees in urban greenery.

Keywords

Acoustic tomography Tree stability Visual assessment 

References

  1. Anon (2015) Fakopp 3D Acoustic Tomograph - User’s Manual. Fakopp Bt., Agfalva, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  2. Bucur V (2005) Ultrasonic techniques for nondestructive testing of standing trees. Ultrasonics 43:237–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Divos F, Divos P (2005) Resolution of stress wave based acoustic tomography. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Shaker Verlag, Eberswalde, pp 307–314Google Scholar
  4. Divos F, Szalai L (2002) Tree evaluation by acoustic tomography. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Berkeley, pp 251–256Google Scholar
  5. Gilbert EA, Smiley ET (2004) Picus sonic tomography for the quantification of decay in white oak (Quercus alba) and hickory (Carya spp.). J Arboric 30:277–281Google Scholar
  6. Heikura T, Terho M, Perttunen J, Sievänen R (2008) A computer-based tool to link decay information to 3D architecture of urban trees. Urban For Urban Gree 7:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnstone D, Moore G, Tausz M, Nicolas M (2010) The measurement of wood decay in landscape trees. Arboric Urban For 36:121–127Google Scholar
  8. Juhásová G, Adamčíková K, Kobza M, Hrubík P, Serbinová K, Hanzel E (2007) Horticultural evaluation of woody plants in the National Cemetery Martin, Slovakia. Folia Oecologica 34:9–15Google Scholar
  9. Li L, Wang X, Wang L, Allison RB (2012) Acoustic tomography in relation to 2D ultrasonic velocity and hardness mappings. Wood Sci Technol 46:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liang S, Wang X, Wiedenbeck J, Cai Z, Fu F (2008) Evaluation of Acoustic Tomography for Tree Decay Detection. In: 15th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. Forest Products Society, Duluth, pp 49–54Google Scholar
  11. Lin C-J, Kao Y-C, Lin T-T, Tsai M-J, Wang S-Y, Lin L-D, Wang Y-N, Chan M-H (2008) Application of an ultrasonic tomographic technique for detecting defects in standing trees. Int Biodeter Biodegr 62:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mattheck C, Breloer H (1994) Field guide for visual tree assessment (VTA). Arboric J 18:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maurer H, Schubert SI, Bächle F, Clauss S, Gsell D, Dual J, Niemz P (2006) A simple anisotropy correction procedure for acoustic wood tomography. Holzforschung 60:567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicolotti G, Socco LV, Martinis R, Godio A, Sambuelli L (2003) Application and comparison of three tomographic techniques for detection of decay in trees. J Arboric 29:66–78Google Scholar
  15. Pellerin RF, Ross RJ (2002) Nondestructive Evaluation of Wood. Forest Products Society, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  16. Pereira-Rollo LC, Silva Filho DF, Tomazello Filho M, Moraes SO, Couto HTZ (2014) Can the impulse propagation speed from cross-section tomography explain the conditioned density of wood? Wood Sci Technol 48:689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pokorny J (2003) Urban Tree Risks Management: A Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation. USDA Forest Service, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  18. Rabe C, Ferner D, Fink S, Schwarze FWMR (2004) Detection of decay in trees with stress waves and interpretation of acoustic tomograms. Arboric J 28:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rayner ADM, Boddy L (1988) Fungal Decomposition of Wood. Its Biology and Ecology. Wiley Ltd., ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. Schubert S (2007) Acousto-Ultrasound Assessment of Inner Wood-Decay in Standing Trees: Possibilities and Limitations. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ZurichGoogle Scholar
  21. Schubert S, Gsell D, Dual J, Motavalli M, Niemz P (2009) Acoustic wood tomography on trees and the challenge of wood heterogeneity. Holzforschung 63:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwarze FWMR, Lonsdale D, Mattheck C (1995) Detectability of wood decay caused by Ustulina deusta in comparison with other tree-decay fungi. Eur J For Pathol 25:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. StatSoft, Inc. (2011) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. http://www.statsoft.com. Accessed 27 Jan 2015
  24. Terho M, Hantula J, Hallaksela A-M (2007) Occurrence and decay patterns of common wood-decay fungi in hazardous trees felled in the Helsinki City. For Pathol 37:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Allison RB (2008) Decay detection in red oak trees using a combination of visual inspection, acoustic testing, and resistance microdrilling. Arboric Urban For 34:1–4Google Scholar
  26. Wang X, Wiedenbeck J, Ross RJ, Forsman JW, Erickson JR, Pilon C, Brashaw BK (2005) Nondestructive evaluation of incipient decay in hardwood logs. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-162. USDA Forest Service, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang X, Allison RB, Wang L, Ross RJ (2007) Acoustic tomography for decay detection in red oak trees. Research Paper FPL-RP-642. USDA Forest Service, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang X, Wiedenbeck J, Liang S (2009) Acoustic tomography for decay detection in black cherry trees. Wood Fiber Sci 41:127–137Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Branch for Woody Plants BiologyInstitute of Forest Ecology of the Slovak Academy of SciencesNitraSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Genetics and Plant BreedingSlovak University of Agriculture in NitraNitraSlovakia

Personalised recommendations