, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 2153–2175 | Cite as

Growth rings in tropical trees: role of functional traits, environment, and phylogeny

  • Cheryl D. NathEmail author
  • François Munoz
  • Raphaël Pélissier
  • David F. R. P. Burslem
  • G. Muthusankar
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Tree Rings


Key message

Subjective and anatomy-based quantitative indices of distinctness of growth rings in tropical trees were related to deciduousness, species maximum height, and also potentially to local topography, independent of phylogenetic relationships.


Most tropical tree species do not produce distinct growth rings, and the causes of this phenomenon have not received sufficient quantitative study. It has been shown that rainfall seasonality influences the formation of growth rings in some deciduous taxa. However, the numerous exceptions observed call for an examination of additional drivers of the phenomenon. We therefore hypothesized that in addition to seasonal climatic stress, functional and phylogenetic constraints may determine growth-ring distinctness. Ten potentially influential factors were examined in 38 Indian tropical tree species. Distinctness of growth rings was quantitatively assessed based on both subjective visual criteria and objective measures of anatomical characters. Multivariate and phylogenetically constrained analyses were used to test for functional, environmental, and phylogenetic effects. First, subjective scores of growth-ring distinctness correlated with objective anatomical measurements of vessel size and porosity related to water conductance, but also with additional anatomical characteristics unrelated to water dynamics. Second, ring distinctness variables were primarily related to deciduousness and species maximum height, and also weakly influenced by the topographic slope. A phylogenetic signal was detected in wood specific gravity values, the climatic variable of dry season rainfall, and the subjective distinctness score of growth rings, but accounting for phylogenetic structure did not significantly improve the prediction of ring distinctness. Thus, there was no evidence of an evolutionary constraint on the relationship in our sample of species. Our study thus demonstrates how distinctness of growth rings in tropical trees can be objectively represented on a continuous scale, and provides a quantitative explanation for its variability.


Angiosperm Distinctness of growth rings Deciduousness Drought stress Phylogenetic constraint South India 



Financial support of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (USR 3330), France, and from the Rufford Small Grants Foundation (UK) is acknowledged. We thank the private farmers and coffee plantation companies of Kodagu for providing permissions and logistical support for this project. We are grateful to N. Barathan for assistance with slide preparation and data entry, S. Aravajy for botanical assistance, S. Prasad and G. Orukaimoni for technical inputs, and A. Prathap, S. Shiva, B. Saravana, and P. Shiva for field assistance. The corresponding editor and three anonymous reviewers provided insightful comments that improved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Alves ES, Angyalossy-Alfonso V (2000) Ecological trends in the wood anatomy of some Brazilian species. 1. Growth rings and vessels. IAWA J 21:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baas P (1982) Systematic, phylogenetic, and ecological wood anatomy—history and perspectives. In: Baas P (ed) New perspectives in wood anatomy. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya AA, Shah SK (2009) Climatic tree-ring studies in India: past appraisal, present status and future prospects. IAWA J 30:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya A, Shekhar M, Shah SK (2012) Role of tree-ring study in forest management: prospects in Indian context. In: Panda S, Ghosh C (eds) Diversity and conservation of plants and traditional knowledge. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, pp 287–298Google Scholar
  5. Blomberg SP, Garland T (2002) Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J Evol Biol 15:899–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borchert R (1999) Climatic periodicity, phenology, and cambium activity in tropical dry forest trees. IAWA J 20:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boura A, De Franceschi D (2007) Is porous wood structure exclusive of deciduous trees? CR Palevol 6:385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA (2005) Relating tree growth to rainfall in Bolivian rain forests: a test for six species using tree ring analysis. Oecologia 146:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Callado CH, Neto SJS, Scarano FR, Costa CG (2001) Periodicity of growth rings in some flood-prone trees of the Atlantic Rain Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Trees 15:492–497Google Scholar
  11. Carlquist S (1988) Comparative wood anatomy: Systematic, ecological and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S et al (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 12:351–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chowdhury KA (1953) The role of initial parenchyma in the transformation of the structure diffuse-porous to ring-porous in the secondary xylem of the genus Gmelina Linn. Proc Nat Inst Sci India 19:361–369Google Scholar
  14. Chowdhury KA (1964) Growth rings in tropical trees and taxonomy. J Ind Bot Soc 43:334–342Google Scholar
  15. Creber GT, Chaloner WG (1984) Influence of environmental factors on the wood structure of living and fossil trees. Bot Rev 50:357–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dave YS, Rao KS (1982) Seasonal activity of the vascular cambium in Gmelina arborea Roxb. IAWA Bull 3:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Alvim PT (1964) Tree growth periodicity in tropical climates. In: Zimmerman MH (ed) The formation of wood in forest trees. Academic Press, New York, pp 479–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Détienne P (1989) Appearance and periodicity of growth rings in some tropical woods. IAWA Bull 10:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dray S, Dufour AB (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eckstein D (2004) Change in past environments: secrets of the tree hydrosystem. New Phytol 163:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elouard C (2000) Vegetation features in relation to biogeography. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Chandrashekara UM, Elouard C et al (eds) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics, and traditional ecological knowledge. Oxford/IBH, New Delhi, pp 25–42Google Scholar
  22. Fahn A, Burley J, Longman KA, Mariaux A (1981) Possible contributions of wood anatomy to the determination of the age of tropical trees. In: Bormann FH, Berlyn G (eds) Age and growth rate of tropical trees: New dimensions for research. Yale University, New Haven, pp 31–54Google Scholar
  23. Fichtler E, Worbes M (2012) Wood anatomical variables in tropical trees and their relation to site conditions and individual tree morphology. IAWA J 33:119–140Google Scholar
  24. Fortunel C, Ruelle J, Beauchêne J et al (2014) Wood specific gravity and anatomy of branches and roots in 113 Amazonian rainforest tree species across environmental gradients. New Phytol 202:79–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Gamble JS (1922) A manual of Indian timbers. Sampson Low, Marston and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Gamble JS (1935) Flora of the Presidency of Madras. Adlard, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Gärtner H, Schweingruber FH (2013) Microscopic preparation techniques for plant stem analysis. Kessel Publishing House, RemagenGoogle Scholar
  29. Gessler PE, Moore ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1995) Soil-landscape modeling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J GIS. 9:421–432Google Scholar
  30. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Groenendijk P, Sass-Klaassen U, Bongers F, Zuidema PA (2014) Potential of tree-ring analysis in a wet tropical forest: a case study on 22 commercial tree species in Central Africa. For Ecol Manag 323:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heimsch C, Wetmore RH (1939) The significance of wood anatomy in the taxonomy of the Juglandaceae. Am J Bot 26:651–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill MO, Smith AJE (1976) Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multi-state discrete characters. Taxon 25:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IAWA Committee (1989) IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bull 10:219–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iida Y, Poorter L, Sterck FJ et al (2012) Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Funct Ecol 26:274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR et al (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. King DA, Davies SJ, Nur Supardi MN, Tan S (2005) Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed Dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Funct Ecol 19:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King DA, Davies SJ, Noor NSM (2006) Growth and mortality are related to adult tree size in a Malaysian mixed dipterocarp forest. For Ecol Manag 223:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krepkowski J, Bräuning A, Gebrekirstos A (2012) Growth dynamics and potential for cross-dating and multi-century climate reconstruction of Podocarpus falcatus in Ethiopia. Dendrochronologia 30:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lisi CS, Tomazello FM, Botosso PC et al (2008) Tree-ring formation, radial increment periodicity, and phenology of tree species from a seasonal semi-deciduous forest in southeast Brazil. IAWA J 29:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mabberley DJ (2005) The plant-book: a portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcati CR, Oliveira JS, Machado SR (2006) Growth rings in cerrado woody species: Occurrence and anatomical markers. Biota Neotropica v6 (n3), Accessed 6 Aug 2015
  44. Mariaux A (2016) Nature and periodicity of growth rings in African timber: can they be used to determine the age of trees? (Translated by: I. Bossanyi) Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 327:51–76Google Scholar
  45. McDonald PG, Fonseca CR, Overton JMCC, Westoby M (2003) Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades? Funct Ecol 17:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menezes M, Berger U, Worbes M (2003) Annual growth rings and long-term growth patterns of mangrove trees from the Bragança peninsula, North Brazil. Wetl Ecol Manag 11:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Petersen GA (1993) Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects. In: Jakeman AJ et al (eds) Modeling change in environmental systems. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Murthy KRK, Yoganarasimhan SN (1990) Flora of Coorg (Kodagu) Karnataka. Vimsat Publishers, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  49. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotpsots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. NASA LP DAAC (2011) ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM). Version 2. ASTER GDEM is a product of NASA and METI. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota ( Accessed 20 Aug 2015, at
  51. Nath CD, Dattaraja HS, Suresh HS et al (2006) Patterns of tree growth in relation to environmental variability in the tropical dry deciduous forest at Mudumalai, southern India. J Biosci 31:651–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nath CD, Pélissier R, Ramesh BR, Garcia C (2011) Promoting native trees in shade coffee plantations of southern India: comparison of growth rates with the exotic Grevillea robusta. Agrofor Syst 83:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nath CD, Boura A, De Franceschi D, Pélissier R (2012) Assessing the utility of direct and indirect methods for estimating tropical tree age in the Western Ghats, India. Trees 26:1017–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nazma Ganapathy PM, Bhat KM et al (1981) A handbook of Kerala timbers. Kerala Forest Research Institute, PeechiGoogle Scholar
  55. Ouédraogo D-Y, Mortier F, Gourlet-Fleury S et al (2013) Slow-growing species cope best with drought: evidence from long-term measurements in a tropical semi-deciduous moist forest of Central Africa. J Ecol 101:1459–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinform 20:289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pascal J-P (1988) Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India; ecology, structure, floristic composition and succession. Institut Français de Pondicherry, PondicherryGoogle Scholar
  58. Pearson RS, Brown HP (1932) Commercial timbers of India. Government of India Central Publication Branch, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  59. Pélissier R, Pascal J-P (2000) Two-year tree growth patterns investigated from monthly girth records using dendrometer bands in a wet evergreen forest in India. J Trop Ecol 16:429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pianka ER (1970) On r- and K-selection. Am Nat 104:592–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, et al. (2016). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-124,>
  62. Pivovaroff AL, Pasquini SC, De Guzman ME et al (2015) Multiple strategies for drought survival among woody plant species. Funct Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12518 Google Scholar
  63. Poorter L, McDonald I, Alarcón A et al (2010) The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytol 185:481–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Purkayastha SK (1999) A manual of Indian timbers. Sribhumi Publishing Co, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  65. Queenborough SA, Porras C (2014) Expanding the coverage of plant trait databases: a comparison of specific leaf area derived from fresh and dried leaves. Pl Ecol Divers 7:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. R Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  67. Rani PBJ, Sathish BN, Mohana GS et al (2011) Field guide-trees of coffee agroforestry systems in Kodagu. College of Forestry, PonnampetGoogle Scholar
  68. Rao KS, Rajput KS (1999) Seasonal behaviour of vascular cambium in Teak (Tectona grandis) growing in moist deciduous and dry deciduous forests. IAWA J 20:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reich PB (2014) The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol 102:275–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rozendaal DMA, Zuidema PA (2011) Dendroecology in the tropics: a review. Trees 25:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9:671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Schöngart J, Piedade MTF, Ludwigshausen S et al (2002) Phenology and stem-growth periodicity of tree species in Amazonian floodplain forests. J Trop Ecol 18:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schweingruber FH, Börner A, Schulze E-D (2007) Atlas of woody plant stems: evolution, structure, and environmental modifications. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith WK (1978) Temperatures of desert plants: another perspective on the adaptability of leaf size. Science 201:614–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sonsin JO, Gasson PE, Barros CF, Marcati CR (2012) A comparison of the wood anatomy of 11 species from two cerrado habitats (cerrado s.s. and adjacent gallery forest). Bot J Linn Soc 170:257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stahle DW (1999) Useful strategies for the development of tropical tree ring chronologies. IAWA J 20:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc 161:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tomlinson PB, Longman KA (1981) Growth phenology of tropical trees in relation to cambial activity. In: Bormann FH, Berlyn G (eds) Age and growth rate of tropical trees: New dimensions for research. Yale University, New Haven, pp 7–19Google Scholar
  79. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Verheyden A, Kairo JG, Beeckman H, Koedam N (2004) Growth rings, growth ring formation and age determination in the mangrove, Rhizophora mucronata. Ann Bot 94:59–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Pl Soil 199:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wheeler EA, Baas P, Rodgers S (2007) Variations in dicot wood anatomy: a global analysis based on the Insidewood database. IAWA J 28:229–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Worbes M (1989) Growth rings, increment and age of trees in inundation forests, savannas and a mountain forest in the Neotropics. IAWA Bull 10:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Worbes M (1999) Annual growth rings, rainfall-dependent growth and long-term growth patterns of tropical trees from the Caparo Forest Reserve in Venezuela. J Ecol 87:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Worbes M (2002) One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics—a brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia 20:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Worbes M, Blanchart S, Fichtler E (2013) Relations between water balance, wood traits and phenological behavior of tree species from a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica: a multifactorial study. Tree Physiol 33:527–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Wright IJ, Falster DS, Pickup M, Westoby M (2006) Cross-species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits, and their implications for plant hydraulics. Physiol Plant 127:445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zanne AE, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Coomes DA, et al. (2009) Data from: Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Dryad Digital Repository. Accessed 6 Aug 2015

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheryl D. Nath
    • 1
    Email author
  • François Munoz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raphaël Pélissier
    • 3
    • 1
  • David F. R. P. Burslem
    • 4
  • G. Muthusankar
    • 1
  1. 1.French Institute of PondicherryUMIFRE 21/USR 3330, CNRS-MAEEPondicherryIndia
  2. 2.Université de Montpellier, UMR AMAPMontpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.IRD, UMR AMAPMontpellier Cedex 5France
  4. 4.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations