Biomass allocation patterns in forests growing different climatic zones of China
- 411 Downloads
Temperature generally explained variation in branch and leaf biomasses, whereas stem and root biomasses–temperature relationships restricted certain age stages may not hold at broader age ranges.
In this study, biomass data for alpine temperate Larix forest, alpine Picea-Abies forest, temperate typical deciduous broadleaved forest, temperate Pinus tabulaeformis forest, temperate mixed coniferous-broadleaved forest, montane Populus-Betula deciduous forest, subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest, subtropical montane Cupressus and Sabina forest, subtropical Pinus massoniana forest and subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata forest were used to examine the effect of temperature on biomass allocations between organs. The data of the ten forests were classified as ≤30, 31–60 and >60 years, to test whether biomass allocations of these age group forests vary systematically in their responses to temperature. With increasing mean annual temperature, branch and leaf biomasses significantly increased in ≤30, 31–60 and >60 years and all age groups; stem biomass significantly increased in ≤30-, 31–60- and >60-year groups, but no significant trend in all age groups; Root biomass significantly increased in 31–60, >60 years and all age groups, but had no response to mean annual temperature in the 30-year group, which suggest that root biomass allocation in response to temperature is dependent upon forest age. We conclude that temperature generally explained variation in branch and leaf biomasses, whereas stem and root biomasses–temperature relationships restricted certain age stages may not hold at broader age ranges.
KeywordsAllocation pattern China Forest Organ biomass Temperature
We are grateful that Dr. Luo provided the precious information for our study. This research was partially supported by Foundation of Guangdong Forestry Bureau (Nos. 4400-F11031, 4400-F11055).
Compliance with ethical statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Canadell JG, Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Field CB, Buitenhuis ET, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Gillett NP, Houghton RA, Marland G (2007) Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18866–18870CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Falster D, Warton D, Wright I (2006) User’s guide to SMATR: standardised major axis tests and routines version 2.0, copyright 2006. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/
- Luo TX (1996) Patterns of net primary productivity for Chinese major forest types and their mathematical models. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chinese Academy of Sciences, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Niu SL, Wu MY, Han Y, Xia JY, Li LH, Wan SQ (2008) Water-mediated responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to climatic change in a temperate steppe. N Phytol 177:209–219Google Scholar
- Peñuelas J, Gordon C, Llorens L, Nielsen T, Tietema A, Beier C, Bruna P, Emmett B, Estiarte M, Gorissen A (2004) Nonintrusive field experiments show different plant responses to warming and drought among sites, seasons, and species in a north-south European gradient. Ecosystems 7:598–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Michell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J, GCTE-NEWS (2000) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562Google Scholar
- Wang B, Liu MC, Zhang B (2009) Dynamics of net production of Chinese forest vegetation based on forest inventory data. For Resour Manag 1:35–43 (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar