Trees

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 1447–1457 | Cite as

Within-canopy variation in needle morphology and anatomy of vascular tissues in a sparse Scots pine forest

  • Roman Gebauer
  • Jan Čermák
  • Roman Plichta
  • Zuzana Špinlerová
  • Josef Urban
  • Daniel Volařík
  • Reinhart Ceulemans
Original Paper

Abstract

Key message

Azimuthal sides of the canopy affected neither needle morphology nor vascular anatomy. However, a significance was found to be associated with canopy height. The needle morphological and anatomical parameters of vascular tissues were scaled up to the forest stand level.

Abstract

In conifers the needle is the key organ for photosynthesis and transpiration, and these two processes are influenced by the morphological and anatomical structure of the needle. Although many factors are involved in needle development, long-term irradiance gradients through the canopy as well as across the forest are among the main drivers. The present study had two principal objectives: (1) to obtain a better knowledge of the morphological and anatomical parameters of sun, transient and shade needles taken from different azimuthal orientations of a sparse Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand; and (2) to scale up these needle data to the forest stand level. One-year-old needles were collected from mature Scots pine trees from branches on the south- and the north-facing azimuthal sides of the canopy at three different canopy heights. Needle structural parameters were measured on cross sections at the needle base. Azimuthal sides of the canopy had no effect on the needle morphology and anatomy since the irradiation was similar on both canopy sides due to the low leaf area index (1.31) of the sparse Scots pine forest. However, sampling height (i.e. sun versus shade needles) had a significant effect on the studied parameters, the largest differences being needle stele area, xylem area, phloem area and number of tracheids. Tracheid frequency, leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity and needle density were the only parameters which were not influenced by canopy height. Our measurements revealed that in a given hectare of pine forest stand, water was transported through approximately 40 × 109 tracheids situated in 380 × 106 needles, whose xylem area was 4.34 m2. This type of data could be helpful for modelling and could provide a better understanding of the forest stand environment, of tree hydraulic systems or of eddy covariance flux measurements of this stand, an established ecosystem site within the European ICOS network.

Keywords

Anatomy Forest stand Hagen–Poiseuille law Pinus sylvestris Sun and shade needles Tracheid 

References

  1. Adams HD, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Barron-Gafford GA, Villegas JC, Breshears DD, Zou CB, Troch PA, Huxman TE (2009) Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global change type drought. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106:7063–7066PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartoń K (2014) MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.10.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  4. Bond BJ, Farnsworth BT, Coulombe RA, Winner WE (1999) Foliage physiology and biochemistry in response to light gradients in conifers with varying shade tolerance. Oecologia 120:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter GA, Smith WK (1985) Influence of shoot structure on light interception and photosynthesis in conifers. Plant Physiol 79:1038–1043PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Čermák J, Riguzzi F, Ceulemans R (1998) Scaling up from the individual tree to the stand level in Scots pine. 1. Needle distribution, overall crown and root geometry. Ann Sci For 55:63–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Čermák J, Jimenez MS, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Morales D (2002) Laurel forests in Tenerife, Canary Islands: II. Efficiency of the water conducting system in Laurus azorica trees. Trees Struc Funct 16:538–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charra-Vaskou K, Mayr S (2011) The hydraulic conductivity of the xylem in conifer needles (Picea abies and Pinus mugo). J Exp Bot 62:4383–4390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Charra-Vaskou K, Badel E, Burlett R, Cochard H, Delzon S, Mayr S (2012) Hydraulic efficiency and safety of vascular and non-vascular components in Pinus pinaster leaves. Tree Physiol 32:1161–1170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochard H, Froux F, Mayr S, Coutand C (2004) Xylem wall collapse in water-stressed pine needles. Plant Physiol 134:401–408PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cruiziat P, Cochard H, Améglio T (2002) Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Ann For Sci 59:723–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dale JE (1988) The control of leaf expansion. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39:267–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebauer R, Volařík D, Urban J, Børja I, Nagy NE, Eldhuset TD, Krokene P (2011) Effect of thinning on anatomical adaptations of Norway spruce needles. Tree Physiol 31:1103–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gielen B, De Vos B, Campioli M, Neirynck J, Papale D, Verstraeten A, Ceulemans R, Janssens IA (2013) Biometric and eddy covariance-based assessment of decadal carbon sequestration of a temperate Scots pine forest. Agric For Meteorol 174–175:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishii H, Ford ED, Boscolo ME, Manriquez AC, Wilson M, Hinckley TM (2002) Variation in specific needle area of old-growth Douglas-fir in relation to needle age, within-crown position and epicormic shoot production. Tree Physiol 22:31–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Janssens IA, Sampson DA, Čermák J, Meiresonne L, Riguzzi F, Overloop S, Ceulemans R (1999) Above- and belowground phytomass and carbon storage in a Belgian Scots pine stand. Ann For Sci 56:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Junttila O, Heide OM (1981) Shoot and needle growth in Pinus sylvestris as related to temperature in northern Fennoscandia. For Sci 27:423–430Google Scholar
  18. Kellomäki S, Oker-Blom P (1983) Canopy structure and light climate in a young Scots pine stand. Silva Fenn 17:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lhotáková Z, Albrechtová J, Malenovský Z, Rock BN, Polák T, Cudlín P (2007) Does the azimuth orientation of Norway spruce (Picea abies/L./Karst.) branches within sunlit crown part influence the heterogeneity of biochemical, structural and spectral characteristics of needles? Environ Exp Bot 59:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin JX, Sampson DA, Ceulemans R (2001) The effect of crown position and tree age on resin canal density in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. Can J Bot 79:1257–1261Google Scholar
  21. Lin J, Sampson DA, Deckmyn G, Ceulemans R (2002) Significant overestimation of needle surface area estimated based on needle dimensions in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Can J Bot 80:927–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lukjanova A, Mandre M (2008) Anatomical structure and localisation of lignin in needles and shoots of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) growing in a habitat with varying environmental characteristics. For Stud 49:37–46Google Scholar
  23. Luomala EM, Laitinen K, Sutinen S, Kellomäki S, Vapaavuori E (2005) Stomatal density, anatomy and nutrient concentrations of Scots pine needles are affected by elevated CO2 and temperature. Plant Cell Environ 28:733–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martre P, Durand JL, Cochard H (2000) Changes in axial hydraulic conductivity along elongating leaf blades in relation to xylem maturation in tall feste. New Phytol 146:235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mencuccini M, Bonosi L (2001) Leaf/sapwood area ratios in Scots pine show acclimation across Europe. Can J For Res 31:442–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neirynck J, Janssens IA, Roskams P, Quataert P, Verschelde P, Ceulemans R (2008) Nitrogen biogeochemistry of a mature Scots pine forest subjected to high nitrogen loads. Biogeochemistry 91:201–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niinemets Ü (1997) Distribution patterns of foliar carbon and nitrogen as affected by tree dimensions and relative light conditions in the canopy of Picea abies. Trees Struct Funct 11:144–154Google Scholar
  28. Niinemets Ü, Kull O (1995) Effects of light availability and tree size on the architecture of assimilative surface in the canopy of Picea abies: variation in needle morphology. Tree Physiol 15:307–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Niinemets Ü, Sõber A, Kull O, Hartung W, Tenhunen JD (1999) Apparent controls on leaf conductance by soil water availability via light-acclimation of foliage structural and physiological properties in a mixed deciduous, temperate forest. Int J Plant Sci 160:707–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niinemets Ü, Ellsworth DS, Lukjanova A, Tobias M (2001) Site fertility and the morphological and photosynthetic acclimation of Pinus sylvestris needles to light. Tree Physiol 21:1231–1244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Niinemets Ü, Ellsworth DS, Lukjanova A, Tobias M (2002) Dependence of needle architecture and chemical composition on canopy light availability in three North American Pinus species with contrasting needle length. Tree Physiol 22:747–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Niinemets Ü, Lukjanova A, Turnbull MH, Sparrow AD (2007) Plasticity in mesophyll volume fraction modulates light-acclimation in needle photosynthesis in two pines. Tree Physiol 27:1137–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira G, Werner C, Correia O (1996) Are ecophysiological responses influenced by crown position in cork-oak? Ann Sci For 53:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Op de Beeck M, Gielen B, Jonckheere I, Samson R, Janssens IA, Ceulemans R (2010) Needle age-related and seasonal photosynthetic capacity variation is negligible for modelling yearly gas exchange of a sparse temperate Scots pine forest. Biogeosciences 7:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peters J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez AM, Jimenez MS, Morales D, Wieser G (2008) Influence of canopy position, needle age and season on the foliar gas exchange of Pinus canariensis. Eur J For Res 127:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poyatos R, Martínez-Vilalta J, Čermák J, Ceulemans R, Granier A, Irvine J, Köstner B, Lagergren F, Meiresonne L, Nadezhdina N et al (2007) Plasticity in hydraulic architecture of Scots pine across Eurasia. Oecologia 153:245–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Primicia I, Imbert JB, Traver MC, Castillo FJ (2014) Inter-specific competition and management modify the morphology, nutrient content and resorption in Scots pine needles. Eur J For Res 133:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Protz CG, Silins U, Lieffers VJ (2000) Reduction in branch sapwood hydraulic permeability as a factor limiting survival of lower branches of lodgepole pine. Can J For Res 30:1088–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  40. Roderick ML, Berry SL, Noble IR (2000) A framework for understanding the relationship between environment and vegetation based on the surface area to volume ratio of leaves. Funct Ecol 14:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook MN (2003) The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: coordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ 26:1343–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sellin A, Kupper P (2004) Within-crown variation in leaf conductance of Norway spruce: effects of irradiance, vapor pressure deficit, leaf water status and plant hydraulic constraints. Ann For Sci 61:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharkey TD, Yeh SS (2001) Isoprene emission from plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 52:407–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Pittermann J (2006) Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels. Am J Bot 93:1490–1500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tributsch H (1985) Die Wasser-Zugspannung-Insuffizienz Hypothese zum Waldsterben. J For Pathol 15:237–246Google Scholar
  46. Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Urban J, Čermák J, Ceulemans R (2015) Above- and below-ground biomass, surface and volume, and stored water in a mature Scots pine stand. Eur J For Res 134:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vose JM, Dougherty PM, Long JN, Smith FW, Gholz HL, Curran PJ (1994) Factors influencing the amount and distribution of leaf area of pine stands. Ecol Bull 43:102–114Google Scholar
  50. Way DA, Oren R (2010) Differential responses to changes in growth temperature between trees from different functional groups and biomes: a review and synthesis data. Tree Physiol 30:669–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitehead D, Kelliher FM, Frampton CM, Godfrey MJS (1994) Seasonal development of leaf area in a young, widely spaced Pinus radiata D Don stand. Tree Physiol 14:1019–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Xiao CW, Curiel Yuste J, Janssens IA, Roskams P, Nachtegale L, Carrara A, Sanchez BY, Ceulemans R (2003) Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a 73-year-old Scots pine forest. Tree Physiol 23:505–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Xiao CW, Janssens IA, Yuste JC, Ceulemans R (2006) Variation of specific leaf area and upscaling to leaf area index in mature Scots pine. Trees Struct Funct 20:304–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yan CF, Han SJ, Zhou YM, Wang CG, Dai GH, Xiao WF, Li MH (2012) Needle-age related variability in nitrogen, mobile carbohydrates, and δ13C within Pinus koraiensis tree crown. PLoS One 7:e35076. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035076 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zwieniecki MA, Stone HA, Leigh A, Boyce K, Holbrook NM (2006) Hydraulic design of pine needles: one-dimensional optimization for single-vein leaves. Plant Cell Environ 29:803–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Gebauer
    • 1
  • Jan Čermák
    • 1
  • Roman Plichta
    • 1
  • Zuzana Špinlerová
    • 1
  • Josef Urban
    • 1
  • Daniel Volařík
    • 1
  • Reinhart Ceulemans
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and GeobiocoenologyMendel UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium

Personalised recommendations