Role of aquaporin activity in regulating deep and shallow root hydraulic conductance during extreme drought
Deep root hydraulic conductance is upregulated during severe drought and is associated with upregulation in aquaporin activity.
In 2011, Texas experienced the worst single-year drought in its recorded history and, based on tree-ring data, likely its worst in the past millennium. In the Edwards Plateau of Texas, rainfall was 58 % lower and the mean daily maximum temperatures were >5 °C higher than long-term means in June through September, resulting in extensive tree mortality. To better understand the balance of deep and shallow root functioning for water supply, we measured root hydraulic conductance (KR) in deep (~20 m) and shallow (5–10 cm) roots of Quercus fusiformis at four time points in the field in 2011. Deep roots of Q. fusiformis obtained water from a perennial underground (18–20 m) stream that was present even during the drought. As the drought progressed, deep root KR increased 2.6-fold from early season values and shallow root KR decreased by 50 % between April and September. Inhibitor studies revealed that aquaporin contribution to KR increased in deep roots and decreased in shallow roots as the drought progressed. Deep root aquaporin activity was upregulated during peak drought, likely driven by increased summer evaporative demand and the need to compensate for declining shallow root KR. A whole-tree hydraulic transport model predicted that trees with greater proportions of deep roots would have as much as five times greater transpiration during drought periods and could sustain transpiration during droughts without experiencing total hydraulic failure. Our results suggest that trees shift their dependence on deep roots versus shallow roots during drought periods, and that upregulation of aquaporin activity accounts for at least part of this increase.
KeywordsCaves Cavitation Climate change Embolism Water potential
- Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim J-H, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2009) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol Manag 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cook ER, Woodhouse CA, Eakin CM, Meko DM, Stahle DW (2004) North American summer PDSI reconstructions. IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology. Data contribution series # 2004-045. NOAA/NGDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USAGoogle Scholar
- Diffenbaugh NS, Ashfaq M, Scherer M (2011) Transient regional climate change: analysis of the summer climate response in a high-resolution, century-scale ensemble experiment over the continental United States. J Geophys Res 116:D24111Google Scholar
- Domec J-C, Noormets A, King JS, Sun G, McNulty SG, Gavazzi MJ, Boggs JL, Treasure EA (2009a) Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation. Plant Cell Environ 32:980–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elliot WR, Veni G (eds) (1994) The caves and karst of Texas. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, AL, USAGoogle Scholar
- McCulloh KA, Johnson DM, Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR (2014) The dynamic pipeline: Hydraulic capacitance and xylem hydraulic safety in four tall conifer species. Plant Cell Environ 37: 1171–1183Google Scholar
- Steudle E, Peterson CA (1998) How does water get through roots? J Exp Bot 49:775–788Google Scholar
- Texas Forest Service (2012) Texas A&M forest survey shows 301 million trees killed by drought. Online: http://texasforestservice.tamu.edu/main/popup.aspx?id=16509
- Vandeleur RK, Mayo G, Shelden MC, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman S (2009) The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol 149:445–460PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar