Trees

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 915–921 | Cite as

Comparative axial widening of phloem and xylem conduits in small woody plants

Original Paper

Abstract

Key message

Along the stem axis phloem’s sieve elements increase in diameter basally at rates comparable to those of xylem conduits and in agreement with principles of hydraulic optimization.

Abstract

Plant physiology relies on the efficiency of the two long-distance transport systems of xylem and phloem. Xylem architecture comprises conduits of small dimensions towards the stem apex, where transpiration-induced tensions are the highest along the root-to-leaves hydraulic pathway, and widen basally to minimize the path length resistance to water flow. Instead, information on phloem anatomy and allometry is extremely scarce, although potentially relevant for the efficiency of sugar transportation. We measured the hydraulic diameter (Dh) of both xylem conduits and phloem sieve elements in parallel at different heights along the stem of a small tree of Picea abies, Fraxinus excelsior and Salix eleagnos. Dh increased from the stem apex to base in both xylem and phloem, with a higher scaling exponent (b) of sieve elements than that of tracheids in the conifer (0.19 vs. 0.14) and lower than that of vessels in the angiosperms (0.14–0.22 vs. 0.19–0.40). In addition, sieve elements were larger than tracheids in P. abies and narrower than angiosperms vessels at any height along the stem. In conclusion, axial conduit widening would seem to be a key feature of both xylem and phloem long-distance transport architectures.

Keywords

Phloem Xylem Widening Tapering Sieve tubes Long-distance transport 

References

  1. Anfodillo T, Carraro V, Carrer M, Fior C, Rossi S (2006) Convergent tapering of xylem conduits in different woody species. New Phytol 169:279–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anfodillo T, Petit G, Crivellaro A (2013) Axial conduit widening in woody species: a still neglected anatomical pattern. IAWA 34:352–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angeles G, Bond B, Boyer JS, Brodribb T, Brooks JR, Burns MJ, Cavender-Bares J, Clearwater M, Cochard H, Comstock J, Davis SD, Domec JC, Donovan L, Ewers F, Gartner B, Hacke U, Hinckley T, Holbrook NM, Jones HG, Kavanagh K, Law B, Lopez-Portillo J, Lovisolo C, Martin T, Martinez-Vilalta J, Mayr S, Meinzer FC, Melcher P, Mencuccini M, Mulkey S, Nardini A, Neufeld HS, Passioura J, Pockman WT, Pratt RB, Rambal S, Richter H, Sack L, Salleo S, Schubert A, Schulte P, Sparks JP, Sperry J, Teskey R, Tyree M (2004) The cohesion-tension theory. New Phytol 163:451–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker P, Gribben RJ, Lim CM (2000) Tapered conduits can buffer hydraulic conductance from path-length effects. Tree Physiol 20:965–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bettiati D, Petit G, Anfodillo T (2012) Testing the equi-resistance principle of the xylem transport system in a small ash tree: empirical support from anatomical analyses. Tree Physiol 32:171–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohonak AJ (2004) RMA: software for reduced major axis regression v.1.17. University of San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiol 132:2166–2173PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ, Gutiérrez MV (2003) Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant Cell Environ 26:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, Cochard H, Delzon S, Bhaskar R, Bucci SJ, Feild TS, Gleason SM, Hacke UG, Jacobsen AL, Lens F, Maherali H, Martínez-Vilalta J, Mayr S, Mencuccini M, Mitchell PJ, Nardini A, Pittermann J, Pratt RB, Sperry JS, Westboy M, Wright IJ, Zanne AE (2012) Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491:752–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Schepper V, Steppe K (2010) Development and verification of a water and sugar transport model using measured stem diameter variations. J Exp Bot 61:2083–2099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Schepper V, De Swaef T, Bauweraerts I, Steppe K (2013) Phloem transport: a review of mechanisms and controls. J Exp Bot 64:4839–4850Google Scholar
  13. Ewers F, Fisher J (1991) Why vines have narrow stems: histological trends in Bauhinia (Fabaceae). Oecologia 88:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloch KA (2001) Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia 126:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ho LC, Nichols R (1975) The role of phloem transport in the translocation of sucrose along the stem of carnation cut flowers. Ann Bot 39:439–446Google Scholar
  16. Höltta T, Mencuccini M, Nikinmaa E (2009) Linking phloem function to structure: analysis with a coupled xylem-phloem transport model. J Theor Biol 259:325–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hölttä T, Vesala T, Perämäki M, Nikinmaa E (2006) Refilling of embolised conduits as a consequence of ‘Münch water’ circulation. Funct Plant Biol 33:949–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen KH, Lee J, Bohr T, Bruus H, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (2011) Optimality of the Münch mechanism for translocation of sugars in plants. J R Soc Interface 8:1155–1165PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen KH, Liesche J, Bohr T, Schulz A (2012) Universality of phloem transport in seed plants. Plant Cell Environ 35:1065–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knoblauch M, van Bel AJE (1998) Sieve tubes in action. Plant Cell 10:35–50PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Köckenberger W, Pope JM, Xia Y, Jeffrey KR, Komor E, Callaghan PT (1997) A non-invasive measurement of phloem and xylem water flow in castor bean seedlings by nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging. Planta 201:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolb KJ, Sperry JS (1999) Differences in drought adaptation between subspecies of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Ecology 80:2373–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lacointe A, Minchin PEH (2008) Modelling phloem and xylem transport within a complex architecture. Funct Plant Biol 35:772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lampinen MJ, Noponen T (2003) Thermodynamic analysis of the interaction of the xylem water and phloem sugar solution and its significance for the cohesion theory. J Theor Biol 224:285–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lintunen A, Kalliokoski T (2010) The effect of tree architecture on conduit diameter and frequency from small distal roots to branch tips in Betula pendula, Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiol 30:1433–1447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mencuccini M, Hölttä T, Martinez-Vilalta J (2011) Comparative criteria for models of the vascular transport systems of tall trees. In: Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Dawson TE (eds) Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function, vol 4. Springer, Netherlands, pp 309–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minchin PEH, Lacointe A (2005) New understanding on phloem physiology and possible consequences for modelling long-distance carbon transport. New Phytol 166:771–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nardini A, Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S (2011) Refilling embolized xylem conduits: is it a matter of phloem unloading? Plant Sci 180:604–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nepstad DC, Tohver IM, Ray D, Moutinho P, Cardinot G (2007) Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. Ecology 88:2259–2269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olson ME, Rosell JA (2012) Vessel diameter-stem diameter scaling across woody angiosperms and the ecological causes of xylem vessel diameter variation. New Phytol 197:1204–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petit G, Anfodillo T (2009) Plant physiology in theory and practice: an analysis of the WBE model for vascular plants. J Theor Biol 259:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petit G, Anfodillo T, Mencuccini M (2008) Tapering of xylem conduits and hydraulic limitations in sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) trees. New Phytol 177:653–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petit G, Anfodillo T, De Zan C (2009) Degree of tapering of xylem conduits in stems and roots of small Pinus cembra and Larix decidua trees. Botany 87:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petit G, Anfodillo T, Carraro V, Grani F, Carrer M (2011) Hydraulic constraints limit height growth in trees at high altitude. New Phytol 189:241–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quilhó T, Pereira H, Richter HG (2000) Within-tree variation in phloem cell dimensions and proportions in Eucalyptus globulus. IAWA 21:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosner S, Baier P, Kikuta S (2001) Osmotic potential of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] secondary phloem in relation to anatomy. Trees 15:472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan MG, Asao S (2014) Phloem transport in trees. Tree Physiol 34:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan MG, Phillips N, Bond BJ (2006) The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. Plant Cell Environ 29:367–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sala A, Piper F, Hoch G (2010) Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol 186:274–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sevanto S, Höltta T, Holbrook NM (2011) Effects of the hydraulic coupling between xylem and phloem on diurnal phloem diameter variation. Plant Cell Environ 34:690–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woodruff DR (2014) The impacts of water stress on phloem transport in Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiol 34:5–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro-ForestaliUniversità degli Studi di PadovaLegnaroItaly

Personalised recommendations