Trees

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 733–744 | Cite as

Airborne LiDAR derived canopy height model reveals a significant difference in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) heights based on slope and aspect of sites

  • Hanieh Saremi
  • Lalit Kumar
  • Russell Turner
  • Christine Stone
Original Paper

Abstract

Key message

Significant relationship between tree height and ALS-derived topography was shown. Taller trees were found on slopes <10° and southerly aspects. Potential value of ALS in forest management applications was defined.

Abstract

Accurate information on tree height distribution can provide a better understanding of forest productivity and biomass estimation. Airborne light detection and ranging remote sensing, also known as airborne laser scanning (ALS), has proven to be an effective tool for deriving tree height information in forests. While tree height has been reported to vary in response to many environmental factors, few researchers have demonstrated the effect of topography on tree height variation using ALS data. This study investigated the relationship between tree height variation and ALS-derived topographic aspect and slope factors within two even-aged radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantation sites in Nundle, New South Wales, Australia. A total of 447 trees was sampled from 77 plots in two plantation age classes: 193 trees from a 34-year-old site and 254 trees from a 9-year-old site. ALS height estimates were highly correlated with field heights (R2 = 0.90 and RMSE = 0.66 for 2002 and R2 = 0.87 and RMSE = 1.49 for 1977 sites). ALS-derived slope and aspect metrics were shown to have a significant relationship with height variation across the stands. The slope (P < 0.01) and aspect (P < 0.001) were significant in the mixed linear models. Overall taller trees were found on slopes below 10° and on southerly aspects, while shorter trees dominated steeper slopes (>20°) and on northerly aspects. However, aspect gradient appeared to have more significant effect on tree heights than slope classes. These results were further verified using an additional 2,000 randomly located trees sampled across the plantations. The study demonstrates a significant relationship between tree height variation and ALS-derived ground aspect and slope categories which may have potential benefits for improving current wood resource inventories and future productivity models.

Keywords

Height variation Topography ALS derived models Pine forests Aspect-slope classes 

References

  1. Aldred A, Bonner G M, (1985) Application of airborne lasers to forest surveys. Canadian Forestry Service. Canadian Forestry Service, Petawawa National Forestry Centre, Information Report pp 51–62Google Scholar
  2. Andersen H-E, Reutebuch SE, McGaughey RJ (2006) A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods. Can J Remote Sens 32(5):355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auslander M, Nevo E, Inbar M (2003) The effects of slope orientation on plant growth, developmental instability and susceptibility to herbivores. J Arid Environ 55(3):405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry RG (1992) Mountain weather and climate. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J For 64(10):691–692Google Scholar
  6. Bellingham PJ, Tanner EVJ (2000) The influence of topography on tree growth, mortality, and recruitment in a tropical montane forest. Biotropica 32(3):378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benecke U, Nordmeyer AH (1982) Carbon uptake and allocation by Nothofagus Solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook. f.) Poole and Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon ssp. contorta at montane and subalpine altitudes. In: WR H (ed) Carbon uptake and allocation in subalpine ecosystems as a key to management. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 9–21Google Scholar
  8. Bird PR (2000) Farm Forestry in Southern Australia, a focus on clear wood production of specialty timbers. Agriculture Victoria, Pastoral and Veterinary, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler D, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual, release 3. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen HYH, Krestov PV, Klinka K (2002) Trembling aspen site index in relation to environmental measures of site quality at two spatial scales. Can J For Res 32:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Coomes DA, Allen RB (2007) Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth. J Ecol 95:1084–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coops N, Hilker T, Wulder M, St-Onge B, Newnham G, Siggins A, Trofymow J (2007) Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR. Trees Struct Funct 21(3):295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalenius T, Hodges JL (1959) Minimum variance stratification. J Am Stat Assoc 54:88–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drake JB, Knox RG, Dubayah RO, Clark DB, Condit R, Blair JB, Hofton M (2003) Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy Neotropical forests using lidar remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12(2):147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferry B, Morneau F, Bontemps JD, Blanc L, Freycon V (2010) Higher tree fall rates on slopes and waterlogged soils result in lower stand biomass and productivity in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol 98:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ford AJ, Brack C, James RN (2007) Site index prediction for Pinus radiata D. Don at local scale on the southern tablelands of New South Wales using a national forest productivity model. Aust For 70:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forrest WG (1969) Variations in the accumulation, distribution and movement of mineral nutrients in radiata pine plantations. Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  19. Harcombe PA, Allen RB, Wardle JA, Platt KH (1998) Spatial and temporal patterns in stand structure, biomass, growth and mortality in a monospecific Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides (Hook. f.) Poole forests in New Zealand. J Sustain For 6:313–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horn BKP (1981) Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proc IEEE 69:14–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyyppä J, Kelle O, Lehikoinen M, Inkinen M (2001) A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(5):969–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Leckie D, Gougeon F, Yu X, Maltamo M (2008) Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. Int J Remote Sens 29(5):1339–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ivkovic M, Gapare WJ, Wharton T, Jovanovic T, Elms S, McRae TA, Wu HX (2010) Risks affecting breeding objectives for radiata pine in Australia. Aust For 73:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson DJ, Beaulieu WT, Bever JD, Clay K (2012) Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity. Science 336(6083):904–907. doi:10.1126/science.1220269 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimmins JP (1997) Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable management. Prentice Hall Inc, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirchhefer AJ (2000) The influence of slope aspect on tree-ring growth of Pinus sylvestris L. in northern Norway and its implications for climate reconstruction. Dendrochronologia 18:27–40Google Scholar
  27. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (1998) Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 53(4):193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis NB, Ferguson IS (1993) Management of radiata pine. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin D, Lai J, Muller-Landau HC, Mi X, Ma K (2012) Topographic variation in aboveground biomass in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in China. PLoS One 7(10):e48244. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048244 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mascaro J, Asner GP, Muller-Landau HC, van Breugel M, Hall J, Dahlin K (2011) Controls over aboveground forest carbon density on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biogeosciences 8:1615–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGaughey RJ (2007) FUSION manual, version 2.90. USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore JR (2010) Allometric equations to predict the total above-ground biomass of radiata pine trees. Ann For Sci 67(8):806. doi:10.1051/forest/2010042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Næsset E (2004) Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scand J For Res 19:164–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Næsset E, Økland T (2002) Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve. Remote Sens Environ 79(1):105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakai T, Sumida A, Matsumoto K, Ki Daikoku, Si Iida, Park H, Miyahara M, Kodama Y, Kononov A, Maximov T, Yabuki H, Hara T, Ohta T (2008) Aerodynamic scaling for estimating the mean height of dense canopies. Bound Layer Meteor 128(3):423–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson RF, Kimes DS, Salas WA, Routhier M (2000) Secondary forest age and tropical forest biomass estimation using Thematic Mapper imagery. Bioscience 50(5):419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norström F (2002) Forest inventory estimation using remotely sensed data as a stratification tool: a simulation study. Institutionen för skoglig resurshushållning och geomatik, UmeaGoogle Scholar
  38. Park HJ, Turner R, Lim S, Trinder J, Moore D (2011) Analysis of pine tree height estimation using full waveform lidar. In: 34th international symposium on remote sensing of environment - the GEOSS era: towards operational environmental monitoring, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  39. Persson A, Holmgren H, Söderman U (2002) Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne Laser scanner. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(9):925–932Google Scholar
  40. Peuhkurinen J, Mehtätalo L, Maltamo M (2011) Comparing individual tree detection and the area-based statistical approach for the retrevial of forest stand characteristics using airborne laser scanning in Scots pine stands. Can J For Res 41:583–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Popescu SC, Wynne RH (2004) Seeing the trees in the forest: using lidar and multispectral data fusion with local filtering and variable window size for estimating tree height. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70(5):589–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN:3-900051-07-0. Available online at http://www.R-project.org
  43. Reutebuch SE, Andersen H-E, McGaughey RJ (2005) LIDAR: an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. J For 103(6):286–292Google Scholar
  44. Robert A (2003) Simulation of the effect of topography and tree falls on stand dynamics and stand structure of tropical forests. Ecol Model 167:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts SD, Dean TJ, Evans DL, McCombs JW, Harrington RL, Glass PA (2005) Estimating individual tree leaf area in loblolly pine plantations using LiDAR-derived measurements of height and crown dimensions. For Ecol Manag 213:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rombouts J, Ferguson IS, Leech JW (2010) Campaign and site effects in LiDAR prediction models for site-quality assessment of radiata pine plantations in South Australia. Int J Remote Sens 31:1155–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Searle SR, Cassela G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Specht RL (1972) Water use by perennial evergreen plant communities in Australia and Papua New Guinea. Aust J Bot 20:273–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stage AR, Salas C (2007) Interactions of elevation, aspect, and slope in models of forest species composition and productivity. For Sci 53:486–492Google Scholar
  50. Stephens SL, Piirto DD, Caramagno DF (2004) Fire regimes and resultant forest structure in the native Ano Nuevo Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) forest, California. Am Midl Nat 152:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stone C, Penman T, Turner R (2011) Determining an optimal model for processing lidar data at the plot level: results for a Pinus radiata plantation in New South Wales. NZ J For Sci 41:191–205Google Scholar
  52. Tateno R, Takeda H (2003) Forest structure and tree species distribution in relation to topography-mediated heterogeneity of soil nitrogen and light at the forest floor. Ecol Res 18:559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor R, Burt J (2007) Growing olives in Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, PerthGoogle Scholar
  54. Turner RS (2006) An airborne Lidar canopy segmentation approach for estimating above-ground biomass in coastal eucalypt forests. University of New South Wales, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  55. van Laar A, Akça A (2007) Forest Mensuration (Managing Forest Ecosystems #13). Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5:360–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Worrell R, Malcolm DC (1990) Productivity of Sitka spruce in Northern Britain 2. Prediction from site factors. Forestry 63:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang JG, Wang GX, Hua WS, Song CS, Chen YF, Chen ZS (1993) Evaluation of site quality and suitability of trees in the Taihang mountains. Chinese Forest Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang Y, Watanabe M, Li F, Zhang J, Zhang W, Zhai J (2006) Factors affecting forest growth and possible effects of climate change in the Taihang Mountains, northern China. Forestry 79:135–147. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanieh Saremi
    • 1
  • Lalit Kumar
    • 1
  • Russell Turner
    • 2
  • Christine Stone
    • 3
  1. 1.Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Remote Census Pty LtdOcean ShoresAustralia
  3. 3.Forest Science Centre, New South Wales Department of Primary IndustriesBeecroftAustralia

Personalised recommendations