Trees

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1485–1495

Crown allometries are less responsive than stem allometry to tree size and habitat variations in an Indian monsoon forest

  • Cécile Antin
  • Raphaël Pélissier
  • Grégoire Vincent
  • Pierre Couteron
Original Paper

Abstract

While theoretical allometric models postulate universal scaling exponents, empirical relationships between tree dimensions show marked variability that reflects changes in the biomass allocation pattern. As growth of the various tree compartments may be controlled by different functions, it is hypothesized that they may respond differently to factors of variation, resulting in variable tree morphologies and potentially in trade-offs between allometric relationships. We explore the variability of tree stem and crown allometries using a dataset of 1,729 trees located in an undisturbed wet evergreen forest of the Western Ghats, India. We specifically test whether species adult stature, terrain slope, tree size and crown light exposure affect the relationships between stem diameter and stem height (stem allometry), and between stem diameter and crown width, crown area and crown volume (crown allometries). Results show that both stem and crown allometries are subject to variations in relation to both endogenous (tree size, species adult stature) and exogenous (terrain slope, crown light exposure) factors. Stem allometry appears to be more affected by these factors than are crown allometries, including the stem diameter–crown volume relationship, which proved to be particularly stable. Our results support the idea that height is a prevailing adjustment factor for a tree facing variable growth (notably light) conditions, while stem diameter–crown volume allometry responds more to internal metabolic constraints. We ultimately discuss the various sources of variability in the stem and crown allometries of tropical trees that likely play an important role in forest community dynamics.

Keywords

Inter-guild variation Intra-guild variation Tree size Terrain slope Species adult stature Crown light exposure 

Supplementary material

468_2013_896_MOESM1_ESM.docx (48 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)

References

  1. Aiba SI, Kohyama T (1997) Crown architecture and life-history traits of 14 tree species in a warm-temperate rain forest: significance of spatial heterogeneity. J Ecol 85:611–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alder D, Synnott TJ (1992) Permanent sample plot techniques for mixed tropical forest. Tropical Forestry Papers 25, Oxford Forestry Institute, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Anten NPR, Schieving F (2010) The role of wood mass density and mechanical constraints in the economy of tree architecture. Am Nat 175:250–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton PS, Hall P (1992) Comparisons of structure among mixed dipterocarp forests of north-western Borneo. J Ecol 80:459–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banin L, Feldpausch TR, Phillips OL et al (2012) What controls tropical forest architecture? Testing environmental, structural and floristic drivers. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1171–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99:375–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohlman S, O’Brien S (2006) Allometry, adult stature and regeneration requirement of 65 tree species on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. J Trop Ecol 22:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohlman S, Pacala S (2012) A forest structure model that determines crown layers and partitions growth and mortality rates for landscape-scale applications of tropical forests. J Ecol 100:508–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark DB, Olivas PC, Oberbauer SF, Clark DA, Ryan MG (2008) First direct landscape-scale measurement of tropical rain forest Leaf Area Index, a key driver of global primary productivity. Ecol Lett 11(2):163–172Google Scholar
  11. Coomes DA, Allen RB (2007) Mortality and tree-size distributions in natural mixed-age forests. J Ecol 95:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coomes DA, Allen RB (2009) Testing the metabolic scaling theory of tree growth. J Ecol 97:1369–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coomes DA, Duncan RP, Allen RB, Truscott J (2003) Disturbances prevent stem size-density distributions in natural forests from following scaling relationships. Ecol Lett 6:980–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Couteron P, Pélissier R, Nicolini EA, Paget D (2005) Predicting tropical forest stand structure parameters from Fourier transform of very high-resolution remotely sensed canopy images. J Appl Ecol 42:1121–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cusset G (1980) Sur les paramètres intervenant dans la croissance des arbres: la relation hauteur-diamètre de l’axe primaire aérien. Candollea 35:231–255Google Scholar
  16. Davies RB (1987) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74:33–43Google Scholar
  17. Falster DS, Westoby M (2005) Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia. J Ecol 9:521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldpausch TR, Banin L, Phillips OL, Baker TR, Lewis SL et al (2011) Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences 8:1081–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferry B, Morneau F, Bontemps J, Blanc L, Freycon V (2010) Higher treefall rates on slopes and waterlogged soils result in lower stand biomass and productivity in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol 98:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fournier M, Stokes A, Coutand C, Fourcaud T, Moulia B (2006) Tree biomechanics and growth strategies in the context of forest functional ecology. In: Herrel A, Speck T, Rowe NP (eds) Ecology and biomechanics: a mechanical approach to the ecology of animals and plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gatsuk LE, Smirnova OV, Vorontzova LI, Zogolnova LB, Zhukova LA (1980) Age states of plants of various growth forms: a review. J Ecol 68:675–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gayon J (2000) History of the concept of allometry. Am Zool 40:748–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilmore DW (2001) Equations to describe crown allometry of Larix require local validation. For Ecol Manag 148:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gimaret-Carpentier C, Pélissier R, Pascal J-P, Houllier F (1998) Sampling strategies for the assessment of tree species diversity. J Veg Sci 9:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978) Tropical trees and forests: an architectural analysis. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harja D, Vincent G, Mulia R, van Noordwijk M (2012) Tree shape plasticity in relation to crown exposure. Trees 26:1275–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heineman KD, Jensen E, Shapland A, Bogenrief B, Tan S, Rebarber R, Russo SE (2011) The effects of belowground resources on aboveground allometric growth in Bornean tree species. For Ecol Manag 261:1820–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henry HAL, Aarssen LW (1999) The interpretation of stem diameter–height allometry in trees: biomechanical constraints, neighbour effects, or biased regressions? Ecol Lett 2:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iida Y, Kohyama TS, Kubo T, Kassim AR, Poorter L, Sterck F, Potts MD (2011) Tree architecture and life-history strategies across 200 co-occurring tropical tree species. Funct Ecol 25:1260–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iida Y, Poorter L, Sterck FJ, Kassim AR, Kubo T, Potts MD, Kohyama TS (2012) Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Funct Ecol 26:274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King DA (1990) Allometry of saplings and understorey trees of a Panamanian forest. Funct Ecol 4:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King DA (1996) Allometry and life history of tropical trees. J Trop Ecol 12:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King DA, Davies KF, Nur Supardi MN, Tan S (2005) Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Funct Ecol 19:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kohyama T (1987) Significance of architecture and allometry in saplings. Funct Ecol 1:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohyama T (1993) Size-structured tree population in gap-dynamic forest—the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J Ecol 81:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohyama T, Suzuki E, Partomihardjo T, Yamada T, Kubo T (2003) Tree species differentiation in growth, recruitment and allometry in relation to maximum height in a Bornean mixed dipterocarp forest. J Ecol 91:797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lang AC, Härdtle W, Bruelheide H, Geißler C, Nadrowski K, Schuldt A, Yu M, von Oheimb G (2010) Tree morphology responds to neighbourhood competition and slope in species-rich forests of subtropical China. For Ecol Manag 260:1708–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lines ER, Zavala MA, Purves DW, Coomes DA (2012) Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1017–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loffeier ME (1989) Sylviculture et sylvigenese en foret sempervirente du Coorg (sud-ouest de l`Inde). Travaux de la section scientifique et technique, 26. French Institute of Pondicherry, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Losos E, Leigh EG Jr (2004) Tropical forest diversity and dynamism—finding from a large-scale plot network. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Mascaro J, Asner GP, Muller-Landau HC, van Breugel M, Hall J, Dahlin K (2010) Controls over aboveground forest carbon density on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biogeosci Discuss 7:8817–8852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moravie M-A, Durand M, Houllier F (1999) Ecological meaning and predictive ability of social status, vigour and competition indices in a tropical rain forest (India). For Ecol Manag 117:221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muggeo VMR (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22:3055–3071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muggeo VMR (2008) Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20–25Google Scholar
  45. Muller-Landau HC, Condit R, Chave J et al (2006) Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 9:575–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nogueira EM, Nelson BW, Fearnside PM, França MB, de Oliveira ACA (2008) Tree height in Brazil’s “arc of deforestation”: shorter trees in south and southwest Amazonia imply lower biomass. For Ecol Manag 255:2963–2972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oldeman RAA (1974) L’architecture de la forêt guyanaise. Mémoires ORSTOM 73, ParisGoogle Scholar
  48. Osada N, Tateno R, Hyodo F, Takeda H (2004) Changes in crown architecture with tree height in two deciduous tree species: developmental constraints or plastic response to the competition for light? For Ecol Manag 188:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paget D (1999) Etude de la diversité spatiale des écosystèmes forestiers guyanais. Réflexion méthodologique et application. PhD dissertation, Ecole Nationale de Génie Rural des Eaux et Forêts, Nancy, FranceGoogle Scholar
  50. Pascal J-P (1984) Les forêts denses humides sempervirentes des Ghâts occidentaux de l’Inde : écologie, structure, floristique, succession. Travaux de la Section Scientifique et Technique 20, Institut Français de Pondichéry, IndeGoogle Scholar
  51. Pascal J-P, Pélissier R (1996) Structure and floristic composition of a tropical evergreen forest in south-west India. J Trop Ecol 12:191–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pélissier R (1997) Hétérogénéité spatiale et dynamique d’une forêt dense humide dans les Ghâts occidentaux de l’Inde. Publications du Département d’Ecologie 37. Institut Français de Pondichéry, IndeGoogle Scholar
  53. Pélissier R (1998) Tree spatial patterns in three contrasting plots of a southern Indian tropical moist evergreen forest. J Trop Ecol 14:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pélissier R, Pascal J-P, Ayyappan N, Ramesh BR, Aravajy S, Ramalingam SR (2011) Twenty years tree demography in an undisturbed dipterocarp Permanent Sample Plot at Uppangala, Western Ghats of India—Data Paper. Ecology 92:1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ploton P, Pélissier R, Proisy C, Flavenot T, Barbier N, Rai SN, Couteron P (2012) Assessing aboveground tropical forest biomass using Google Earth canopy images. Ecol Appl 22:993–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poorter L, Bongers F, Sterck FJ, Wöll H (2003) Architecture of 53 rain forest tree species differing in adult stature and shade tolerance. Ecology 84:602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Poorter L, Bongers F, Sterck FJ, Wöll H (2005) Beyond the regeneration phase: differentiation of height-light trajectories among tropical tree species. J Ecol 93:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pretzsch H, Dieler J (2012) Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory. Oecologia 169:637–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Proisy C, Barbier N, Guéroult M, Pélissier R, Gastellu-Etchegorry J-P, Couteron P (2012) Biomass prediction in tropical forests: the canopy grain approach. In: Fatoyinbo T (ed) Remote sensing of biomass: principles and applications. Book 1, Intech Open Access Publisher, Croatia, pp 59–76Google Scholar
  60. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramesh BR, Pascal J-P, Nouguier C (1997) Atlas of endemics of the Western Ghats (India): Distribution of tree species in the evergreen and semi-evergreen forest. Publications du Département d’Ecologie 38, Institut Français de Pondichéry, IndeGoogle Scholar
  62. Robert A (2001) Modélisation de l’effet de la topographie sur la dynamique et la structure de peuplements forestiers hétérogènes. PhD dissertation, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  63. Robert A (2003) Simulation of the effect of topography and tree falls on stand dynamics and stand structure of tropical forests. Ecol Model 167:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robert A, Moravie M-A (2003) Topographic variation and stand heterogeneity in a wet evergreen forest of India. J Trop Ecol 19:697–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruger N, Berger U, Hubbell SP, Vieilledent G, Condit R (2011) Growth strategies of tropical tree species: disentangling light and size effects. Plos One 6:e25330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Russell MB, Weiskittel AR (2011) Maximum and largest crown width equations for 15 tree species in Maine. North J Appl For 28:84–91Google Scholar
  67. Russo SE, Wiser SK, Coomes DA (2007) Growth–size scaling relationships of woody plant species differ from predictions of the metabolic ecology model. Ecol Lett 10:889–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Silveira AP, Martins FR, Araújo FS (2012) Are tree ontogenetic structure and allometric relationship independent of vegetation formation type? A case study with Cordia oncocalyx in the Brazilian caatinga. Acta Oecol 43:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sterck FJ, Bongers F (1998) Ontogenetic changes in size, allometry, and mechanical design of tropical rain forest trees. Am J Bot 85:266–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sterck FJ, Bongers F (2001) Crown development in tropical rain forest trees: patterns with tree height and light availability. J Ecol 89:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas SC (1996) Asymptotic height as a predictor of growth and allometric characteristics in Malaysian rain forest trees. Am J Bot 83:556–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Umeki K (1995) Modeling the relationship between the asymmetry in crown display and local environment. Ecol Model 82:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New-YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vincent G, Sabatier D, Blanc L, Chave J, Weissenbacher E, Pélissier R, Fonty E, Molino J-F, Couteron P (2012) Accuracy of small footprint airborne LiDAR in its predictions of tropical moist forest stand structure. Rem Sens Env 125:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vincent G, Caron F, Sabatier D, Blanc L (2013) LiDAR shows that higher forests have more slender trees. Bois Forêts TropiquesGoogle Scholar
  76. Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. West GB, Enquist BJ, Brown JH (2009) A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:7040–7045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yamada T, Ngakan OP, Suzuki E (2005) Differences in growth trajectory and strategy of two sympatric congeneric species in an Indonesian floodplain forest. Am J Bot 92:45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cécile Antin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raphaël Pélissier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Grégoire Vincent
    • 1
  • Pierre Couteron
    • 1
  1. 1.IRD, UMR AMAP (Botany and Bioinformatics of Plant Architecture)Montpellier Cedex 05France
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, French Institute of PondicherryUMIFRE MAEE-CNRSPuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations