, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1061–1070

Estimation of stem and tree level biomass models for Prosopis juliflora/pallida applicable to multi-stemmed tree species

  • Emil Cienciala
  • Alex Centeio
  • Petr Blazek
  • Maria da Cruz Gomes Soares
  • Radek Russ
Original Paper


The aim of this paper is to develop biomass models for commonly multi-stemmed Prosopis juliflora/pallida trees. The data were collected on three of the Cape Verde islands (Maio, Santiago and Santo Antao). The dataset covers 240 trees containing 1,882 stems with stem diameter at breast height over 2 cm; of that 255 individual tree stems were sampled destructively. These calibration data were used to construct stem and tree-level models for estimation of total aboveground biomass and its fine and course fractions with diameter threshold of 5 cm. A set of parameterized biomass models for multi-stemmed Prosopis spp. trees suited for biomass estimation at tree and stem levels using appropriate set of independent variables, commonly available in forest inventory programs, was created. The effect of site (island) on tree allometry was not detected. The two-phase construction of tree biomass models based on destructive sampling limited to individual stems combined with a routine field measurement of entire multi-stemmed tree specimen represents a practicable approach leading to biomass and carbon assessment that may be generally suited for tree species with complex multi-stemmed growth form similar to that of Prosopis spp.


Aboveground biomass Carbon Allometric equations Inventory Woody resources 


  1. Alvarez JA, Villagra PE, Villalba R (2011a) Factors controlling deadwood availability and branch decay in two Prosopis woodlands in the Central Monte, Argentina. Forest Ecol Manag 262:637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez JA, Villagra PE, Villalba R, Cony MA, Alberto M (2011b) Wood productivity of Prosopis flexuosa DC woodlands in the central Monte: influence of population structure and tree-growth habit. J Arid Environ 75:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 12:351–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cienciala E, Cerny M, Tatarinov F, Apltauer A, Exnerova Z (2006) Biomass functions applicable to Scots pine. Trees-Struct Funct 20:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cienciala E, Apltauer J, Exnerova Z, Tatarinov F (2008) Biomass functions applicable to oak trees grown in Central-European forestry. J Forest Sci (Prague) 54:109–120Google Scholar
  6. Diniz AC, de Matos GC (1988) Map of the agro ecological zones and vegetation of Cabo Verde—Maio Island. Garcia de Orta, Sér. Bot., Lisboa 10(1–2):19–48Google Scholar
  7. Diniz AC, de Matos GC (1999) Map of the agro ecological zones and vegetation of Cabo Verde—Santo Antao Island. Garcia de Orta, Sér. Bot., Lisboa 14(2):1–34Google Scholar
  8. IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. Little EL Jr, Wadesworth FH (1964) Common trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook 249, superintendent of documents. US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Marklund LG (1987) Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden. Report. Umea, Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 43Google Scholar
  11. Marklund LG (1988) Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Report. Umea, Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 45Google Scholar
  12. Muturi GM, Mohren GMJ, Kimani JN (2010) Prediction of Prosopis species invasion in Kenya using geographical information system techniques. African J Ecol 48:628–636Google Scholar
  13. Muturi GM, Kariuki JG, Poorter L, Mohren GMJ (2011) Allometric equations for estimating biomass in naturally established Prosopis stands in Kenya. J Hortic For 4:69–77Google Scholar
  14. Nelson BW, Mesquita R, Pereira JLG, de Souza SGA, Batista GT, Couto LB (1999) Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon. Forest Ecol Manag 117:149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Padrón E, Navarro RM (2004) Estimation of above-ground biomass in naturally occurring populations of Prosopis pallida (H. & B. ex. Willd.) H.B.K. in the north of Peru. J Arid Environ 56:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Palacios RA, Burghardt AD, Frias-Hernandez JT, Olalde-Portugal V, Grados N, Alban L, Martinez-de la Vega O (2012) Comparative study (AFLP and morphology) of three species of Prosopis of the section Algarobia: P. juliflora, P. pallida, and P. limensis. Evidence for resolution of the “P. pallidaP. juliflora complex”. Plant Syst Evol 298:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pasziecnik NM, Harris PJC, Smith SJ (2003) Identifying Prosopis species: a field guide. HDRA, Coventry, UK. ISBN 0 905343 34 4Google Scholar
  18. Schwarz GE (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sherry M, Smith S, Patel A, Harris P, Hand P, Trenchard L, Henderson J (2011) RAPD and microsatellite transferability studies in selected species of Prosopis (section Algarobia) with emphasis on P. juliflora and P. pallida. J Genet 90:251–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sprugel DG (1983) Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64:209–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400(6745):664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zachariades C, Hoffmann JH, Roberts AR (2011) Biological control of mesquite (Prosopis species) (Fabaceae) in South Africa. Afr Entomol 19:402–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zanne AE, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Coomes DA, Ilic J, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Miller RB, Swenson NG, Wiemann MC, Chave J (2009) Global wood density database. Dryad Digital Repository. Identifier:
  24. Zianis D, Mecuccini M (2004) On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass. Forest Ecol Manag 187:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, Mencuccini M (2005) Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fenn Monogr 4:63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emil Cienciala
    • 1
  • Alex Centeio
    • 2
  • Petr Blazek
    • 1
  • Maria da Cruz Gomes Soares
    • 2
  • Radek Russ
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research (IFER)Jílové u PrahyCzech Republic
  2. 2.Ministry of Rural DevelopmentDirectorate General for Agriculture, Forestry and Animal Industry (DGASP), Achada São Felipe—PraiaSantiago IslandCape Verde

Personalised recommendations