Trees

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 183–191 | Cite as

Stem and whole-plant hydraulics in olive (Olea europaea) and kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)

  • Bartolomeo Dichio
  • Giuseppe Montanaro
  • Adriano Sofo
  • Cristos Xiloyannis
Original Paper

Abstract

A field study and an experiment under controlled conditions using pressure-flux relationships were conducted to compare the stem and whole-plant conductance in olive (Olea europaea) and kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) species. Anatomical observations were also made on one-year-old stem to determine the conductive area of vessels (Aves) and the total xylem area (Axyl). Results show that Aves of kiwifruit twigs was ~2.5-fold of that in olive twigs, and the hydraulically weighted mean diameter was up to threefold that of the olive ones. One-year-old olive twigs had lower hydraulic conductivity (k) than the kiwifruit, while values of leaf-specific conductivity (i.e. k normalised per unit leaf area) were higher than the kiwifruit (i.e. ~49 and 29 × 10−6 kg m−1 s−1 MPa−1, respectively). In the field experiment, the flux of sap (heat balance method) and differences in water potential through the soil–plant system (ΔP) were used for both species to calculate the whole-plant conductance that was normalised per unit leaf area (leaf-specific whole-plant conductance, Kplant,LA). Values of Kplant,LA are attributable to the combined effect of the ΔP and anatomical features of conduits. Olive species showed a larger ΔP (2.4 MPa at midday) than the kiwifruit (0.5 MPa) which contributed to lower Kplant,LA in Olea than the Actinidia plants. This information, combined with vessel density data, contributes to explain differences amidst olive and kiwifruit species, in terms of susceptibility to some drought-related hydraulic impairments induced by the Mediterranean environment.

Keywords

Hydraulic conductivity Kiwifruit Olive Plant conductance Sap flow Xylem vessels 

References

  1. Bacelar EA, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Gonçalves BC, Ferreira HF, Correia CM (2007) Changes in growth, gas exchange, xylem hydraulic properties and water use efficiency of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes. Environ Exp Bot 60:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker P, Tyree MT, Tsuda M (1999) Hydraulic conductances of angiosperms versus conifers: similar transport sufficiency at the whole-plant level. Tree Physiol 19:445–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black MZ, Patterson KJ, Minchin PEH, Gould KS, Clearwater MJ (2011) Hydraulic responses of whole vines and individual roots of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) following root severance. Tree Physiol 31:508–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodersen CR, McElrone AJ, Choat B, Matthews MA, Shackel KA (2010) The dynamics of embolism repair in xylem: in vivo visualizations using high-resolution computed tomography. Plant Physiol 154:1088–1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodribb TJ (2009) Xylem hydraulic physiology: the functional backbone of terrestrial plant productivity. Plant Sci 177:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christman MA, Sperry JS, Adler FR (2009) Testing the ‘rare pit’ hypothesis for xylem cavitation resistance in three species of Acer. New Phytol 182:664–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clearwater MJ, Clark CJ (2003) In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of xylem vessel contents in woody lianas. Plant Cell Environ 26:1205–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clearwater MJ, Lowe RG, Hofstee BJ, Barclay C, Mandemaker AJ, Blattmann P (2004) Hydraulic conductance and rootstock effects in grafted vines of kiwifruit. J Exp Bot 55:1371–1382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condon JM (1992) Aspects of kiwifruit stem structure in relation to transport. Acta Hortic 297:419–426Google Scholar
  10. Dichio B, Romano M, Nuzzo V, Xiloyannis C (2003) Soil water availability and relationship between canopy and roots in young olive trees (cv Coratina). Acta Hortic 586:255–258Google Scholar
  11. Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Sofo A, Montanaro G (2006) Osmotic regulation in leaves and roots of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) during water deficit and rewatering. Tree Physiol 26:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dünisch O, Morais RR (2002) Regulation of xylem sap flow in an evergreen, a semi-deciduous, and a deciduous Meliaceae species from the Amazon. Trees 16:404–416Google Scholar
  13. Fernández JE, Palomo MJ, Díaz-Espejo A, Clothier BE, Green SR, Giróna IF, Moreno F (2001) Heat-pulse measurements of sap flow in olives for automating irrigation: tests, root flow and diagnostics of water stress. Agric Water Manag 51:99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Froux F, Huc R, Ducrey M, Dreyer E (2002) Xylem hydraulic efficiency versus vulnerability in seedlings of four contrasting Mediterranean tree species (Cedrus atlantica, Cupressus sempervirens, Pinus halepensis and Pinus nigra). Ann For Sci 59:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goudriaan J, van Laar HH (1994) Modelling potential crop growth processes. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holzapfel EA, Merino R, Mariño MA, Matta R (2000) Water production functions in kiwi. Irrigation Sci 19:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen WA (1962) Botanical histochemistry: principles and practice. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  18. Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S (1990) Wood anatomy of some trees and ring-porous wood: some functional and ecological interpretations. Giornale Botanico Italiano 124:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S, Piaceri EC, Rosso R (1995) Relations between vulnerability to xylem embolism and xylem conduit dimension in young trees of Quercus cerris. Plant Cell Environ 18:661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S, Rosso R, Trifilò P (2003) Drought resistance of 2-year-old saplings of Mediterranean forest trees in the field: relations between water relations, hydraulics and productivity. Plant Soil 250:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lòpez-Bernal Á, Alcántara E, Testi L, Villalobos FJ (2010) Spatial sap flow and xylem anatomical characteristics in olive trees under different irrigation regimes. Tree Physiol 30:1536–1544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martínez-Vilalta J, Mangirón M, Ogaya R, Miquel S, Serrano L, Peñuela J, Piñol J (2003) Sap flow of three co-occurring Mediterranean woody species under varying atmospheric and soil water conditions. Tree Physiol 23:747–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meinzer FC, Clearwater MJ, Goldstein C (2001) Water transport in trees: current perspectives, new insights and some controversies. Environ Exp Bot 45:239–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Melcher PJ, Holbrook NM, Burns MJ, Zwieniecki MA, Cobb AR, Brodribb TJ, Choat B, Sack L (2012) Measurements of stem xylem hydraulic conductivity in the laboratory and field. Methods Ecol Evol. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00204.x Google Scholar
  25. Montanaro G, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C (2007) Response of photosynthetic machinery of field-grown kiwifruit under Mediterranean conditions during drought and rewatering. Photosynthetica 45(4):533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Montanaro G, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C (2009) Shade mitigates photoinhibition and enhances water use efficiency in kiwifruit under drought. Photosynthetica 47(3):363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nuzzo V, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Piccotino D, Massai R (1997) Contribution to transpiration of different tissues of kiwifruit vines from their water reserves. Acta Hortic 444:329–334Google Scholar
  28. Phillips N, Bond BJ, Mcdowell NG, Ryan MG (2002) Canopy and hydraulic conductance in young, mature and old Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiol 22:205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raimondo F, Trifilò P, Lo Gullo MA, Buffa R, Cardini A, Salleo S (2009) Effects of reduced irradiance on hydraulic architecture and water relations of two olive clones with different growth potentials. Environ Exp Bot 66:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reid DEB, Silins U, Mendoza C, Lieffers VJ (2005) A unified nomenclature for quantification and description of water conducting properties of sapwood xylem based on Darcy’s law. Tree Physiol 25:993–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salleo S, Lo Gullo MA, Olivieri F (1985) Hydraulic parameters measured in 1-year-old twigs of some Mediterranean species with diffuse-porous wood: changes in hydraulic conductivity and their possible functional significance. J Exp Bot 36:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sellin A, Rohejä RV, Rahi M (2008) Distribution of vessel size, vessel density and xylem conducting efficiency within a crown of silver birch (Betula pendula). Trees 22:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sellin A, Sack L, Õunapuu E, Karosion A (2011) Impact of light quality on leaf and shoot hydraulic properties: a case study in silver birch (Betula pendula). Plant Cell Environ 34:1079–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sperry JS, Saliendra NZ (1994) Intra- and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betulla occidentalis. Plant Cell Environ 17:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sperry JS, Holbrook NM, Zimmermann MH, Tyree MT (1987) Spring filling of xylem vessels in wild grapevines. Plant Physiol 83:414–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sperry JS, Donnelly JR, Tyree MT (1988) A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant Cell Environ 11:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sperry JS, Stiller V, Hacke UG (2003) Xylem hydraulics and the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum: opportunities and unresolved issues. Agron J 95:1362–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sterck F, Zweifel R, Klaassen US, Chowdhury Q (2008) Persisting soil drought reduces leaf specific conductivity in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens). Tree Physiol 28:529–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Takemoto Y, Greenwood MS (1993) Maturation in larch: age-related changes in xylem development in the long-shoot foliage and the main stem. Tree Physiol 13:253–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trifilò P, Lo Gullo MA, Cardini A, Pernice F, Salleo S (2007) Rootstock effects on xylem conduit dimensions and vulnerability to cavitation of Olea europaea L. Trees 21:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tyree MT (1988) A dynamic model for water flow in a single tree: evidence that models must account for hydraulic architecture. Tree Physiol 4:195–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyree MT (2003) Hydraulic limits on tree performance: transpiration, carbon gain and growth of trees. Trees 17:95–100Google Scholar
  43. Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tyree MT, Velez V, Dalling JW (1998) Growth dynamics of root and shoot hydraulic conductance in seedlings of five neotropical tree species: scaling to show possible adaptation to differing light regimes. Oecologia 114:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xiloyannis C, Gucci R, Dichio B (2003) Irrigazione. In: Forino P (ed) Olea: Trattato di Olivicoltura. Il Sole 24 ORE Edagricole S.r.l, Bologna, pp 365–389 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  46. Zimmermann MH (1978) Hydraulic architecture of some diffuse-porous trees. Can J Bot 56:2286–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zimmermann MH, Jeje A (1981) Vessel-length distribution in stems of some American woody plants. Can J Bot 59:1882–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bartolomeo Dichio
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Montanaro
    • 1
  • Adriano Sofo
    • 2
  • Cristos Xiloyannis
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento delle Culture Europee e del Mediterraneo: Architettura, Ambiente, Patrimoni Culturali (DiCEM)Università degli Studi della BasilicataPotenzaItaly
  2. 2.Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed AmbientaliUniversità degli Studi della BasilicataPotenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations