, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 337–340 | Cite as

Functional ecology of growth in seedlings versus root sprouts of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.

  • Emad FarahatEmail author
  • Martin J. Lechowicz
Short Communication


We assessed growth differences and the foliar traits underpinning production in paired samples of juvenile American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) that originated from seed versus root sprouts. Root sprouts had significantly greater relative extension growth rate and slightly greater leaf mass per unit area compared to seed-derived individuals, but neither light-saturated net photosynthetic rate nor foliar chlorophyll and nitrogen concentrations differed significantly between paired seedlings and sprouts. The greater height growth rate of saplings originating as root sprouts does not result from differing foliar function, but rather depends on translocation of assimilates from the parent tree to sustain this unusual and ecologically important dual regeneration strategy in American beech.


Fagus grandifolia Root sprouts Seedlings Leaf mass per area (LMA) Chlorophyll content Foliar nitrogen Light-saturated net photosynthetic rate 



We thank Kevin Gibbons and Eri Kagawa for help in sampling, David Peart and the anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript, the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research for scholarship support to EF, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for research support, and McGill University for its stewardship of the Gault Nature Reserve (

Supplementary material

468_2012_781_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)


  1. Arii K, Hamel BR, Lechowicz MJ (2005) Environmental correlates of canopy composition at Mont St. Hilaire, Quebec, Canada. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaudet M, Messier C (2008) Beech regeneration of seed and root sucker origin: a comparison of morphology, growth, survival, and response to defoliation. For Ecol Manag 255:3659–3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaudet M, Brisson J, Gravel D, Messier C (2007) Effect of a major canopy disturbance on the coexistence of Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia in the understorey of an old-growth forest. J Ecol 95:458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canham CD (1988) Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69:786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleavitt NL, Fairbairn M, Fahey TJ (2008) Growth and survivorship of American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) seedlings in a northern hardwood forest following a mast event. J Torrey Bot Soc 135:328–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dix RI, Skrentny RF Jr (1965) Reproduction of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh by seed in Wisconsin. Can J Bot 43:757–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang J, Lechowicz MJ (2006) Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. J Biogeogr 33:1804–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forcier LK (1973) Seedling pattern and population dynamics, and the reproductive strategies of sugar maple, beech and yellow birch at Hubbard Brook. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaskin GJ, Miller JD (1996) Measurement of soil water content using a simplified impedance measuring technique. J Agric Res 63:153–160Google Scholar
  10. Held ME (1983) Patterns of beech regeneration in the east-central United States. Torrey Bot Club 110(1):55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Houston DR (2001) Effect of harvesting regime on beech root sprouts and seedlings in a North-Central Maine forest long affected by beech bark disease. Research Paper NE-717. USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones RH, Raynal DJ (1987) Root sprouting in American beech: production, survival, and the effect of parent tree vigor. Can J For Res 17:539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones RH, Raynal DJ (1988) Root sprouting in American beech (Fagus grandifolia): effects of root injury, root exposure, and season. For Ecol Manag 25:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitamura K, Kawano S (2001) Regional differentiation in genetic components for the American beech, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh., in relation to geological history and mode of reproduction. J Plant Res 114:353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kochenderfer JD, Kochenderfer JN, Warner A, Miller GM (2004) Preharvest manual herbicide treatments for controlling American beech in central West Virginia. North J Appl For 21:40–49Google Scholar
  16. Kochenderfer JD, Kochenderfer JN, Miller GM (2006) Controlling beech root and stump sprouts using the cut-stump method. North J Appl For 23:155–165Google Scholar
  17. Morris AB, Small RL, Cruzan MB (2004) Variation in frequency of clonal reproduction among populations of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. in response to disturbance. Castanea 69:38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niinemets U (2001) Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82:453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nyland RD (2008) Origin of small understory beech in New York northern hardwood stands. North J Appl For 25:161–163Google Scholar
  20. South DB (1995) Relative growth rates: a critique. S Afr For J 173:43–48Google Scholar
  21. Takahashi K, Lechowicz MJ (2008) Do interspecific differences in sapling growth traits contribute to the co-dominance of Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia? Ann Bot 101:103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takahashi K, Arii K, Lechowicz MJ (2010) Codominance of Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia: the role of Fagus root sprouts along a slope gradient in an old-growth forest. J Plant Res 123:665–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tubbs CH, Houston DR (1990) Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods, Agriculture handbook 654. US Department of Agriculture, forest service, Washington, pp 325–332Google Scholar
  24. Uemura A, Ishida A, Matsumoto Y (2005) Simulated seasonal changes of CO2 and H2O exchange at the top canopies of two Fagus trees in a winter-deciduous forest, Japan. For Ecol Manag 212:230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagner S, Collet C, Madsen P, Nakashizuka T, Nyland RD, Sagheb-Talebig K (2010) Beech regeneration research: from ecological to silvicultural aspects. For Ecol Manag 259:2172–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ward RT (1961) Some aspects of regeneration habits of the American beech. Ecology 42:828–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiehle M, Eusemann P, Thevs N, Schnittler M (2009) Root suckering patterns in Populus euphratica (Euphrates poplar, Salicaceae). Trees Struct Funct 23:991–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of ScienceHelwan UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations