Trees

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 131–139

Variation of stilbene glucosides in bark extracts obtained from roots and stumps of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.)

  • Harri Latva-Mäenpää
  • Tapio Laakso
  • Tytti Sarjala
  • Kristiina Wähälä
  • Pekka Saranpää
Original Paper

Abstract

Acetone-soluble compounds found in different root zones and stumps of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst), which were grown on either peatland or a mineral soil site, were studied. Samples from stumps and roots of different sizes and ages were collected a day after the trees were felled. The wood and bark of stumps and three zones of the roots were separated and extracted with acetone in an ultrasonic bath. Extracts were silylated and analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The stilbene glucosides astringin and isorhapontin were major compounds in the spruce bark samples. The resveratrol glucoside piceid and the flavonoid catechin were also extracted from spruce bark. We also found the lignan hydroxymatairesinol in some wood extracts. Total concentrations of stilbene glucosides in bark of stumps and different root zones varied between 0.53 and 8.29 % (w/w, dry weight) with isorhapontin being the major compound. Isorhapontin concentrations were highest in the spruce samples grown on mineral soil. The bark of the roots close to the stem is a rich source of stilbenes for commercial utilisation.

Keywords

Norway spruce Picea abies Roots Stump Bark Stilbene glucosides 

References

  1. Aritomi M, Donnelly D (1976) Stilbene glucosides in the bark of Picea sitchensis. Phytochemistry 15:2006–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balas A, Popa V (2007) On characterization of some bioactive compounds extracted from Picea abies bark. Rom Biotechnol Lett 12:3209–3216Google Scholar
  3. Beyer U, Tesche M, Heller W, Sandermann H (1993) Fungistatic effectiveness of phenolic compounds in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and the effect of SO2. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 112:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chong J, Poutaraud A, Hugueney P (2009) Metabolism and roles of stilbenes in plants. Plant Sci 177:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Co M, Fagerlund A, Engman L, Sunnerheim K, Sjöberg P, Turner C (2011) Extraction of antioxidants from spruce (Picea abies) bark using eco-friendly solvents. Phytochem Anal. doi:10.1002/pca.1316
  6. Ekman R (1979) Distribution of lignans in Norway spruce. Acta Acad Abo Ser B 39:1–6Google Scholar
  7. Evensen P, Solheim H, Hoiland K, Stenersen J (2000) Induced resistance of Norway spruce, variation of phenolic compounds and their effects on fungal pathogens. Forest Pathol 30:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammerbacher A, Ralph S, Boehlmann J, Fenning T, Gershenzon J, Schmidt A (2011) Biosynthesis of the major tetrahydroxystilbenes in spruce, astringin and isorhapontin, proceeds via resveratrol and is enhanced by fungal infection. Plant Physiol 157:876–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hovelstadt H, Leirset I, Oyaas K, Fiksdahl A (2006) Screening analyses of stilbenes, resin acids and lignans in Norwegian conifers. Molecules 11:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li S-H, Niu X-M, Zahn S, Gershenzon J, Weston J, Schneider B (2008) Diastereomeric stilbene glucoside dimers from the bark of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Phytochemistry 69:772–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindberg M, Lundgren L, Gref R, Johansson M (1992) Stilbenes and resin acids in relation to the penetration of Heterobasidion annosum through the bark of Picea abies. Eur J For Pathol 22:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mannila E, Talvitie A (1992) Stilbenes from Picea abies bark. Phytochemistry 31:3288–3289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mérillon JM, Fauconneau B, Teguo PW, Barrier L, Vercauteren J, Huguet F (1997) Antioxidant activity of the stilbene astringin, newly extracted from Vitis vinifera cell cultures. Clin Chem 43:1092–1093PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Münzenberger B, Heilemann J, Strack D, Kottke I, Oberwinkler F (1990) Phenolics of mycorrhizas and non-mycorrhizal roots of Norway spruce. Planta 182:142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Päivänen J, Paavilainen E (1996) Forestry in peatlands. In: Vasander H, (ed.), Peatlands in Finland. Finnish Peatland Society. ISBN 952-90-7971-0, pp 72–83Google Scholar
  16. Pan H, Lundgren L (1995) Phenolic extractives from root bark of Picea abies. Phytochemistry 39:1423–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piispanen R, Willför S, Saranpää P, Holmbom B (2008) Variation of lignans in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) knotwood: within-stem variation and the effect of fertilization at two experimental sites in Finland. Trees 22:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Repo A, Tuomi M, Liski J (2011) Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy 3:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shibutani S, Samejima M, Doi S (2004) Effects of stilbenes from bark of Picea glehnii (Sieb. et Zucc) and their related compounds against feeding behaviour of Reticulitermes speratus (Kolbe). J Wood Sci 50:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Solhaug K (1990) Stilbene glucosides in bark and needles from Picea species. Scand J For Res 5:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strack D, Heilemann J, Wray V, Dirks H (1989) Structures and accumulation patterns of soluble and insoluble phenolics from Norway spruce needles. Phytochemistry 8:2071–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Toscano Underwood C, Pearce R (1991) Astringin and isorhapontin distribution in Sitka spruce trees. Phytochemistry 30:2183–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Viiri H, Annila A, Kitunen V (2001) Induced responses in stilbenes and terpenes in fertilized Norway spruce after inoculation with blue-stain fungus Ceratocystis polonica. Trees 15:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang H, Liu L, Guo Y-X, Dong Y-S, Zhang D-J, Xiu Z-L (2007) Biotransformation of piceid in Polygonum cuspidatum to resveratrol by Aspergillus oryzae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:763–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willför S, Nisula L, Hemming J, Reunanen M, Holmbom B (2004) Bioactive phenolic substances in industrially important tree species. Part 1: knots and stemwood of different spruce species. Holzforschung 58:335–344Google Scholar
  26. Woodward S, Pearce RB (1988) The role of stilbenes in resistance of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong) Carr.) to entry of fungal pathogens. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 33:127–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeneli G, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T, Gershenzon J (2006) Methyl jasmonate treatment of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees increases the accumulation of terpenoid resin components and protects against infection by Ceratocystis polonica, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiol 26:977–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang L, Gellerstedt G (2008) 2D Heteronuclear (1H–13C) Single Quantum Correlation (HSQC) NMR analysis of Norway spruce bark components. In: Hu T (ed), Characterization of lignocellulosic materials. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford. ISBN: 978-1-405-15880-0, pp 3–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harri Latva-Mäenpää
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tapio Laakso
    • 1
  • Tytti Sarjala
    • 3
  • Kristiina Wähälä
    • 2
  • Pekka Saranpää
    • 1
  1. 1.The Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla)VantaaFinland
  2. 2.Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of ChemistryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.The Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla)ParkanoFinland

Personalised recommendations