Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 269–282 | Cite as

Carbon allocation in fruit trees: from theory to modelling

  • Michel GénardEmail author
  • Jean Dauzat
  • Nicolás Franck
  • Françoise Lescourret
  • Nicolas Moitrier
  • Philippe Vaast
  • Gilles Vercambre
Review

Abstract

Carbon allocation within a plant depends on complex rules linking source organs (mainly shoots) and sink organs (mainly roots and fruits). The complexity of these rules comes from both regulations and interactions between various plant processes involving carbon. This paper presents these regulations and interactions, and analyses how agricultural management can influence them. Ecophysiological models of carbon production and allocation are good tools for such analyses. The fundamental bases of these models are first presented, focusing on their underlying processes and concepts. Different approaches are used for modelling carbon economy. They are classified as empirical, teleonomic, driven by source–sink relationships, or based on transport and chemical/biochemical conversion concepts. These four approaches are presented with a particular emphasis on the regulations and interactions between organs and between processes. The role of plant architecture in carbon partitioning is also discussed and the interest of coupling plant architecture models with carbon allocation models is highlighted. As an illustration of carbon allocation models, a model developed for peach trees, describing carbon transfer within the plant, and based on source–sink and Münch transport theory is presented and used for analyzing the link between roots, shoots and reproductive compartments. On this basis, the consequences of fruit load or plant pruning on fruit and vegetative growth can be evaluated.

Keywords

Carbon Allocation Source–sink Architecture Model 

References

  1. Adam B, Donès N, Sinoquet H (2004) VegeSTAR v.3.1: a software to compute light interception and photosynthesis by 3D plant mock-ups. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W et al (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on functional–structural plant models, 7–11 June 2004, Montpellier. Montpellier, p 414Google Scholar
  2. Allen MT, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong TM (2005) Using L-systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. New Phytol 166:869–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson D (1980) The distribution and effectiveness of the roots of tree crops. Hortic Rev 2:424–490Google Scholar
  4. Balandier P, Lacointe A, Le Roux X, Sinoquet H, Cruiziat P, Le Dizes S (2000) SIMWAL: a structural–functional model simulating single walnut tree growth in response to climate and pruning. Ann For Sci 57:571–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball J, Woodrow I, Berry J (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggens J (ed) Progress in photosynthesis research. Proceedings of the VIIth international photosynthesis congress, vol IV. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 221–224Google Scholar
  6. Bancal P, Soltani F (2002) Source–sink partitioning. Do we need Münch? J Exp Bot 25:1919–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassow SL, Ford ED (1990) A process based model of carbon translocation in trees: an exploration of the branch autonomy theory. Silva Carelica 15:77–87Google Scholar
  8. BenMimoun M, Longuenesse JJ, Génard M (1996) Pmax as related to leaf:fruit ratio and fruit assimilate demand in peach. J Hortic Sci 71:767–775Google Scholar
  9. Bidel LPR, Pagès L, Rivière LM, Pelloux G, Lorendeau JY (2000) MassFlowDyn I: a carbon transport and partitioning model for root system architecture. Ann Bot 85:869–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosc A (2000) EMILION, a tree functional–structural model: presentation and first application to the analysis of branch carbon balance. Ann For Sci 57:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruchou C, Génard M (1999) A space–time model of carbon translocation along a shoot bearing fruits. Ann Bot 84:565–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buck-Sorlin GH, Kniemeyer O, Kurth W (2005) Barley morphology, genetics and hormonal regulation of internode elongation modelled by a relational growth grammar. New Phytol 166:859–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cannell MGR (1971) Production and distribution of dry matter in trees of Coffea arabica L. in Kenya as affected by seasonal climatic differences and the presence of fruit. Ann Appl Biol 67:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cannell MGR (1985) Attributes of trees as crop plants. In: Cannell MGR, Jackson JE (eds) Dry matter partitioning in tree crops, National Environment Research Council. Penicuik, Great Britain, pp 160–193Google Scholar
  15. Causton DR, Venus JC (1981) The biometry of plant growth. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Chalmers DJ, Canterford RL, Jerie PH, Jones TR, Ugalde TD (1975) Photosynthesis in relation to growth and distribution of fruit in peach trees. Aust J Plant Physiol 2:635–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chang R (2000) Physical chemistry for the chemical and biological sciences. University Science Books, SausalitoGoogle Scholar
  18. Charles-Edwards DA (1976) Shoot and root activities during steady-state plant growth. Ann Bot 40:767–772Google Scholar
  19. Charles-Edwards DA, Thornley HM (1973) Light interception by isolated plant: a simple model. Ann Bot 37:919–928Google Scholar
  20. Chelle M, Andrieu B (1998) The nested radiosity model for the distribution of light within plant canopies. Ecol Modell 111:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen J, Reynolds JF (1997) A coordination model of whole-plant carbon allocation in relation to water stress. Ann Bot 80:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Costes E (2004) Integrating knowledge of tree biology and physiology into models of fruit tree development: a review. Acta Hortic 636:575–589Google Scholar
  23. Dale JE, Sutcliffe JF (1986) Water relations of plant cells. In: Steward FC, Sutcliffe JF, Dale JE (eds) Plant physiology: a treatise, vol 9, water and solutes in plants. Academic, Orlando, pp 1–48Google Scholar
  24. Daudet FA, Lacointe A, Gaudillère JP, Cruiziat P (2002) Generalized Münch coupling between sugar and water fluxes for modelling carbon allocation as affected by water status. J Theor Biol 214:481–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dauzat J, Eroy MN (1997) Simulating light regime and intercrop yields in a coconut based farming system. Eur J Agron 7:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dauzat J, Franck N, Vaast P (2006) Using virtual plants for upscaling carbon assimilation from the leaf to the canopy level. Application to coffee agroforestry systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st international scientific colloquium on coffee. ASIC, pp 1037–1044Google Scholar
  27. Davidson RL (1969) Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover. Ann Bot 25:59–104Google Scholar
  28. Droppelmann K, Berliner P (2000) Biometric relationships and growth of pruned and non-pruned Acacia saligna under runoff irrigation in northern Kenya. For Ecol Manag 126:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Enquist BJ (2002) Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiol 22:1045–1064PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ericsson T, Rytter L, Vapaavuori E (1996) Physiology of carbon allocation in trees. Biomass Bioenergy 11:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eschenbach C (2005) Emergent properties modelled with the functional structural tree growth model ALMIS: computer experiments on resource gain and use. Ecol Modell 186:470–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Evers JB, Vos J, Fournier C, Andrieu B, Chelle M, Struik PC (2005) Towards a generic architectural model of tillering in Gramineae, as exemplified by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytol 166:801–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fishman S, Génard M (1998) A biophysical model of fruit growth: simulation of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of mass. Plant Cell Environ 21:739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ford ED (1992) The control of tree structure and productivity through the interaction of morphological development and physiological processes. Int J Plant Sci 153:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Franck N, Vaast P, Génard M, Dauzat J (2006) Soluble sugars mediate sink feedback down-regulation of leaf photosynthesis in field-grown Coffea arabica. Tree Physiol 26:517–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Génard M, Lescourret F (2004) Modelling fruit quality: ecophysiological, agronomical and ecological perspectives. In: Dris R, Jain SM (eds) Production practices and quality assessment of food crops, vol 1, preharvest practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 47–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Génard M, Souty M (1996) Modeling the peach sugar contents in relation to fruit growth. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121:1122–1131Google Scholar
  39. Génard M, Pagès L, Kervella J (1998) A carbon balance model of peach tree growth and development for studying the pruning response. Tree Physiol 18:351–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Génard M, Lescourret F, Gomez L, Habib R (2003) Changes in fruit sugar concentrations in response to assimilate supply, metabolism and dilution: a modeling approach applied to peach fruit (Prunus persica). Tree Physiol 23:373–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Génard M, Bertin N, Borel C, Bussières P, Gautier H, Habib R, Léchaudel M, Lecomte A, Lescourret F, Lobit P, Quilot B (2007) Towards a virtual fruit focusing on quality: modelling features and potential uses. J Exp Bot 58:917–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Godin C, Sinoquet H (2005) Functional–structural plant modelling. New Phytol 166:705–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grechi I, Vivin P, Hilbert G, Milin S, Robert T, Gaudillère JP (2007) Effect of light and nitrogen supply on internal C:N balance and control of root-to-shoot biomass allocation in grapevine. Environ Exp Bot 59:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grossman YL, Dejong TM (1994) Peach—a simulation-model of reproductive and vegetative growth in peach-trees. Tree Physiol 14:329–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Grossman YL, Dejong TM (1995) Maximum fruit-growth potential following resource limitation during peach growth. Ann Bot 75:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gucci R, Grappadelli LC, Tustin S, Ravaglia G (1995) The effect of defruiting at different stages of fruit-development on leaf photosynthesis of golden-delicious apple. Tree Physiol 15:35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Havis AL (1962) Effects of time of fruit thinning of Redhaven peach. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 80:172–176Google Scholar
  48. Henton SM, Greaves AJ, Piller GJ, Minchin PEH (2002) Revisiting the Münch pressure-flow hypothesis for long-distance transport of carbohydrates: modelling the dynamics of solute transport inside a semipermeable tube. J Exp Bot 53:1411–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hölttä T, Vesala T, Sevanto S, Perämäki M, Nikinmaa E (2006) Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis. Trees 20:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hurd RG, Gay AP, Mountifield AC (1979) The effect of partial flower removal on the relation between root, shoot and fruit growth in the indeterminate tomato. Ann Appl Biol 93:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Iglesias DJ, Lliso I, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis through source: sink imbalance in citrus is mediated by carbohydrate content in leaves. Physiol Plant 116:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson DS (1995) Effect of flower and fruit thinning on the maturity of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’ apples at harvest. J Hortic Sci 70:541–548Google Scholar
  53. Keller A (1996) Quasi-Monte Carlo methods in computer graphics: the global illumination problem. Lect Appl Math 32:455–469Google Scholar
  54. Kikuchi T, Asada T, Shiozaki Y, Saito T, Kamata S (1989) Effect of summer pruning on the next season’s shoot growth of young apple trees. J Japan Soc Hortic Sci 58:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. King DA (2005) Linking tree form, allocation and growth with an allometrically explicit model. Ecol Modell 185:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kurth W (1998) Some new formalisms for modelling the interactions between plant architecture, competition and carbon allocation. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie 52:53–98Google Scholar
  57. Lacointe A (2000) Carbon allocation among tree organs: a review of basic processes and representation in functional–structural tree models. Ann For Sci 57:521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Léchaudel M, Génard M, Lescourret F, Urban L, Jannoyer M (2002) Leaf-to-fruit ratio affects water and dry-matter content of mango fruit. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77:773–777Google Scholar
  59. Léchaudel M, Génard M, Lescourret F, Urban L, Jannoyer M (2005) Modelling effects of weather and source–sink relationships on mango fruit growth. Tree Physiol 25:583–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Le Roux X, Lacointe A, Escobar-Gutierrez A, Dizes S (2001) Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: a critical appraisal. Ann For Sci 58:469–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lescourret F, Génard M (2005) A virtual peach fruit model simulating changes in fruit quality during the final stage of fruit growth. Tree Physiol 25:1303–1315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Lescourret F, Ben-Mimoun M, Génard M (1998) A simulation model of growth at the shoot-bearing fruit level. I. Description and parameterization for peach. Eur J Agron 9:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lescourret F, Génard M, Habib R, Fishman S (2001) Variation in surface conductance to water vapor diffusion in peach fruit and its effects on fruit growth assessed by a simulation model. Tree Physiol 21:735–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Leuning R (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 18:339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. List R, Küppers M (1998) Light climate and assimilate distribution within segment oriented woody plants growth in the simulation program MADEIRA. In: Kastner-Maresch A, Kurth W, Sonntag M, Breckling B (eds) Individual-based structural and functional models in ecology. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie 52:141–153Google Scholar
  66. Marcelis LFM (1993) Effects of assimilate supply on the growth of individual cucumber fruits. Physiol Plant 87:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marcelis LFM (1996) Simulation of biomass allocation in greenhouse crops: a review. Acta Hortic 328:49–67Google Scholar
  68. Minchin PEH, Thorpe MR, Farrar JF (1993) A simple mechanistic model of phloem transport which explains sink priority. J Exp Bot 44:947–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Muller-Landau HC, Condit RS, Chave J, Thomas SC, Bohiman SA, Bunyavejchewin S, Davies S, Foster R, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Harms KE, Hart T, Hubbell SP, Itoh A, Kassim AR, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Makana JR, Ohkubo T, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Nur Supardi MN, Tan S, Thompson J, Valencia R, Villa Muños G, Wills C, Yamakura T, Chuyong G, Shivaramaiah Dattaraja H, Esufali S, Hall P, Hernandez C, Kenfack D, Kiratiprayoon S, Suresh HS, Thomas D, Vallejo MI, Ashton P (2006) Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 9:575–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Neri D, Sansavini S, Sugiyama N (1992) Summer and root pruning of split-root potted peach trees. Acta Hortic 322:177–189Google Scholar
  71. Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ (2003) An allometric model for seed plant reproduction. Evol Ecol Res 5:79–88Google Scholar
  72. Ögren E (1991) Prediction of photoinhibition of photosynthesis from measurements of fluorescence quenching components. Planta 184:538–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pearcy RW, Yang W (1996) A three-dimensional crown architecture model for assessment of light capture and carbon gain by understory plants. Oecologia 108:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Salminen H, Saarenmaa H, Vakeva J (1996) Lignum a tree model based on simple structural units. Ann Bot 77:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E (1998) LIGNUM: a model combining the structure and the functioning of trees. Ecol Modell 108:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Proebsting EL, Mills HH (1981) Effects of season and crop load on maturity characteristics of ‘Bing’ cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 106:144–146Google Scholar
  77. Quilot B, Génard M, Kervella J, Lescourret F (2002) Ecophysiological analysis of genotypic variation in peach fruit growth. J Exp Bot 53:1613–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Quilot B, Génard M, Lescourret F, Kervella J (2005) Simulating genotypic variation of fruit quality in an advanced peach × Prunus davidiana cross. J Exp Bot 56:3071–3081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Reginato G, Robinson T, García de Cortázar V (2007) Predicted crop value for nectarines and cling peaches of different harvest season as a function of crop load. HortScience 42:239–345Google Scholar
  80. Reynolds JF, Chen JL (1996) Modelling whole-plant allocation in relation to carbon and nitrogen supply: coordination versus optimization: opinion. Plant Soil 185:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Reynolds JF, Thornley JHM (1982) A shoot:root partitioning model. Ann Bot 49:585–597Google Scholar
  82. Röhrig M, Stützel H, Alt C (1999) A three-dimensional approach to modeling light interception in heterogenous canopies. Agron J 91:1024–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sharkey PJ, Pate JS (1976) Translocation from leaves to fruits of a legume, studied by a phloem bleeding technique: diurnal changes and effects of continuous darkness. Planta 128:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form. The pipe model theory. II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Japan J Ecol 14:133–139Google Scholar
  85. Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen J, Hakula H (2000) Components of functional–structural tree models. Ann For Sci 57:399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sinoquet H, Le Roux X, Adam B, Ameglio T Daudet A (2001) RATP: a model for simulating the spatial distribution of radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis within canopies: application to an isolated tree crown. Plant Cell Environ 24:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Soler C, Sillion FX, Blaise F, De Reffye (2003) An efficient instantiation algorithm for simulating radiant energy transfer in plant models. ACM Trans Graph 22:204–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Syvertsen JP, Goñi C, Otero A (2003) Fruit load and canopy shading affect leaf characteristics and net gas exchange of ‘Spring’ navel orange trees. Tree Physiol 23:899–906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Thompson MV, Holbrook NM (2003) Application on a single-solute non-steady-state phloem model to the study of long-distance assimilate transport. J Theor Biol 220:419–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thornley JHM (1972) A model to describe the partitioning of photosynthate during vegetative plant growth. Ann Bot 36:419–430Google Scholar
  91. Thornley JHM (1998) Modelling shoot:root relations: the only way forward? Ann Bot 81:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thornley JHM, Johnson IR (1990) Plant and crop modelling. Oxford University Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  93. Upmeyer DJ, Koller HR (1973) Diurnal trends in net photosynthetic rate and carbohydrate levels of soybean leaves. Plant Physiol 51:871–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Vaast P, Dauzat J, Génard M (2002) Modeling the effects of fruit load, shade and plant water status on coffee berry growth and carbon partitioning at the branch level. Acta Hortic 584:57–62Google Scholar
  95. Vaast P, Angrand J, Franck N, Dauzat J, Génard M (2005) Fruit load and branch ring-barking affect carbon allocation and photosynthesis of leaf and fruit of Coffea arabica in the field. Tree Physiol 25:753–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Vos J, Marcelis LFM, Evers JB (2007) Functional–structural plant modelling in crop production. In: Vos J, Marcelis LFM, de Visser PHB, Struik PC, Evers JB (eds) Functional–structural plant modelling in crop production. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wardlaw IF (1990) Tansley review no. 27. The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol 116:341–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Webster AD, Shepherd UM (1984) The effect of summer shoot tipping and rootstock on the growth, floral bud production, yield and fruit quality of young sweet cherries. J Hortic Sci 59:175–182Google Scholar
  99. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997) A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature (Lond) 400:664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Génard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean Dauzat
    • 2
  • Nicolás Franck
    • 3
  • Françoise Lescourret
    • 1
  • Nicolas Moitrier
    • 1
  • Philippe Vaast
    • 2
  • Gilles Vercambre
    • 1
  1. 1.UR1115 Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles, INRAAvignonFrance
  2. 2.Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DéveloppementMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.Departamento de Producción Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias AgronómicasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations