Trees

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 549–558 | Cite as

Leaf plasticity in response to light of three evergreen species of the Mediterranean maquis

Original Article

Abstract

Morphological, anatomical, biochemical and physiological traits of sun and shade leaves of adult Quercus ilex, Phillyrea latifolia and Pistacia lentiscus shrub species co-occurring in the Mediterranean maquis at Castelporziano (Latium) were studied. Fully expanded sun leaves had 47% (mean of the three species) greater leaf mass area (LMA) and 31% lower specific leaf area (SLA) than shade leaves. Palisade parenchyma thickness contributed on an average 42% to the total leaf thickness, spongy layer 43%, upper epidermal cells 5%, and upper cuticle thickness 3%. Stomatal size was greater in sun (25.5 μm) than in shade leaves (23.6 μm). Total chlorophyll content per fresh mass was 71% greater in shade than in sun leaves, and nitrogen content was the highest in sun (13.7 mg g−1) than in shade leaves (11.8 mg g−1). Difference of net photosynthetic rates (PN) between sun and shade leaves was 97% (mean of the three species). The plasticity index (sensu Valladares et al., New Phytol 148:79–91, 2000a) was the highest for physiological leaf traits (0.86) than for morphological, anatomical and biochemical ones. Q. ilex had the highest plasticity index of morphological, anatomical and physiological leaf traits (0.37, 0.28 and 0.71, respectively) that might explain its wider ecological distribution. The higher leaf plasticity of Q. ilex might be advantageous in response to varying environmental conditions, including global change.

Keywords

Quercus ilex Phillyrea latifolia Pistacia lentiscus Sun/shade leaves Plasticity index Structural and physiological traits 

References

  1. Ashton PMS, Berlyn GP (1992) Leaf adaptations of some Shorea species to sun and shade. New Phytol 121:587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbero M, Loisel R, Quézel P (1992) Biogeography, ecology and history of Mediterranean Quercus ilex ecosystems. Vegetation 99/100:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell MM, Meister HP, Tehunen JD, Lange OL (1986) Canopy structure, light microclimate and leaf gas exchange of Quercus coccifera L. in a Portugese macchia: measurements in different canopy layers and simulations with a canopy model. Trees 1:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callaway RM (1992) Morphological and physiological responses of three California oak species to shade. Int J Plant Sci 153:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter S, Smith ND (1981) A comparative study of leaf thickness among southern Appalachian hardwoods. Can J Bot 59:1393–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crick JC, Grime JP (1987) Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. New Phytol 107:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. García-Plazaola JI, Artetxe U, Duñabeitia MK, Becerril JM (1999) Role of photoprotective systems of holm-oak (Quercus ilex) in the adaptation to winter conditions. J Plant Physiol 155:625–630Google Scholar
  8. Gratani L, Crescente MF (2000) Map-makings of plant biomass and leaf area index for management of protected areas. Aliso 19:1–11Google Scholar
  9. Gratani L, Foti I (1998) Estimating forest structure and shade tolerance of the species in a mixed deciduous broad-leaved forest in Abruzzo, Italy. Ann Bot Fenn 35:75–83Google Scholar
  10. Gratani L, Varone L (2004) Leaf key traits of Erica arborea L., Erica multiflora L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. co-occurring in the Mediterranean maquis. Flora 199:58–69Google Scholar
  11. Grubb P (2002) Leaf form and function–towards a radical new approach. New Phytol 155:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2000) Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in evergreen broad-leaved woody species coexisting in a warm-temperate forest. Tree Physiol 20:1249–1254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Holm G (1954) Chlorophyll mutations in barley. Acta Agric Scand 4:457–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koike T, Kitao M, Maruyama Y, Mori S, Lei TT (2001) Leaf morphology and photosynthetic adjustments among deciduous broad-leaved trees within the vertical canopy profile. Tree Physiol 21:951–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Larcher W (2000) Temperature stress and survival ability of Mediterranean sclerophyllous plants. Plant Biosyst 134:279–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacLachlan S, Zalik S (1963) Plastid structure, chlorophyll concentration, and free aminoacid composition of a chlorophyll mutant of barley. Can J Bot 41:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martínez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Valladares F, Chico JM, Manrique E (2000) Energy dissipation in drought-avoiding and drought-tolerant tree species at midday during the Mediterranean summer. Tree Physiol 20:131–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Meletiou-Christou MS, Rhizopoulou S, Diamantoglou S (1994) Seasonal changes of carbohydrates, lipids and nitrogen content in sun and shade leaves from four Mediterranean evergreen sclerophylls. Environ Exp Bot 34:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mendes MM, Gazarini LC, Rodrigues ML (2001) Acclimation of Myrtus communis to contrasting Mediterranean light environments–effects on structure and chemical composition of foliage and plant water relations. Environ Exp Bot 45:165–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mishra MK (1997) Stomatal characteristics at different ploidy levels in Coffea L. Ann Bot 80:689–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Navas ML, Garnier E (2002) Plasticity of whole plant and leaf traits in Rubia peregrina in response to light, nutrient and water availability. Acta Oecol 23:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Niinemets Ü, Tenhunen JD (1997) A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant Cell Environ 20:845–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2004) Photosynthetic acclimation to simultaneous and interacting environmental stresses along natural light gradients: optimality and constraints. Plant Biol 6:254–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reich PB (1995) Phenology of tropical forests–patterns, causes and consequences. Can J Bot 73:164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:365–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164:S143–S164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhizopoulou S, Meletiou-Christou MS, Diamantoglou S (1991) Water relations for sun and shade leaves of four Mediterranean evergreen sclerophylls. J Exp Bot 42:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sack L, Grubb PJ, Marañón T (2003) The functional morphology of juvenile plants tolerant of strong summer drought in shaded forest understories in southern Spain. Plant Ecol 168:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sultan SE (1995) Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot Neerl 44:363–383Google Scholar
  30. Takashima T, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2004) Photosynthesis or persistence: nitrogen allocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species. Plant Cell Environ 27:1047–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valladares F (1999) Architecture, ecology and evolution of plant crowns. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Handbook of functional plant ecology. Dekker, New York, pp 121–194Google Scholar
  32. Valladares F (2000) Light and plant evolution: adaptation to the extremes versus phenotypic plasticity. In: Greppin H (ed) Advanced studies in plant biology. University of Geneva, Geneva, pp 341–355Google Scholar
  33. Valladares F, Pearcy RW (1997) Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutifolia. Plant Cell Environ 20:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Valladares F, Pearcy RW (1999) The geometry of light interception by shoots of Heteromeles arbutifolia: morphological and physiological consequences for individual leaves. Oecologia 121:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valladares F, Martínez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Perez-Corona E, Manrique E (2000a) Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy? New Phytol 148:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E, Kitajima K, Pearcy RW (2000b) Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81:1925–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright IJ, Westoby M (2002) Leaves at low versus high rainfall: coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. New Phytol 155:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamashita N, Ishida A, Kushima H, Tanaka N (2000) Acclimation to sudden increase in light favouring an invasive over native trees in subtropical islands, Japan. Oecologia 125:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia VegetaleUniversità “La Sapienza”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Institut für BotanikInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations