Advertisement

Trees

, 20:383 | Cite as

Dendrochronology of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) from two range centres in lowland Poland

  • Marcin Koprowski
  • Andrzej Zielski
Original Article

Abstract

In Europe, spruce grows in two main regions which meet in Poland, one to the north and east, the other to the south and west. The northeastern area ranges from the northern treeline extending from Norway to Siberia, to southern Sweden, north-eastern Poland and the southern Ural mountains. The southwestern spruce region reaches the mountainous areas of the Alps and the Balkans, the mountains and uplands of the Sudety Mountains, the Carpathians and neighbouring lowlands. Opinions about the distribution of Norway spruce have changed over the years, and its scarcity in the centre of Poland has been strongly debated. The favoured current theory is that Norway spruce once had a continuous distribution in Poland. It is assumed that the rare occurrence in the central Polish lowland is due to a combination of unfavourable soil conditions and previous management activity. The main aim of this work was to analyse climate–growth relationships of Norway spruce in eastern Poland and distinguish regions with similar increment patterns with regards to spruce range. Spruce growth in northern Polish sites is positively correlated with rainfall from May to July. Tree-ring widths in southern sites are more correlated with March temperature. Selected homogenous regions are the same as range types. Trees from the so-called “spruceless area” seem to have similar climate–growth relationships to trees from the southern region. This finding does not settle the question of the origin of the trees, but it does indicate that similar environmental conditions exist in these two areas and proves that the climate was not a limiting factor there.

Keywords

Picea abies Poland Dendrochronology Dendroclimatology Statistical analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Martin Bridge for checking the English version and comments on the manuscript. The research was supported by the Polish Committee for Scientific Research No. 3PO6L 048 23 and by the Institute of Ecology and Environment Protection of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.

References

  1. Aniol RW (1983) Tree-ring analysis using CATRAS. Dendrochronologia 1:45–53Google Scholar
  2. Bednarz Z (1996) June–July temperature variation for the Babia Góra National Park, Southern Poland, for the period 1650–1910. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Prace Geograficzne - Zeszyt 102:523–529Google Scholar
  3. Bednarz Z, Jaroszewicz B, Ptak J, Szwagrzyk J (1998–1999) Dendrochronology of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] in the Babia Góra National Park, Poland. Dendrochronologia 16–17:45–55Google Scholar
  4. Briffa K, Cook E (1990) Methods of response function analysis. In: Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (eds). Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental sciences. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 240–247Google Scholar
  5. Briffa K, Schweingruber FH, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Harris IC, Shiyatov SG, Vaganov EA, Grudd H (1998) Trees tell of past climate: but are they speaking less clearly today? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dittmar C, Elling W (1999) Jahrringbreite von Fichte und Buche in Abhängigkeit von Witterung und Höhenanlage. Forstwiss Centralbl 118:251–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dittmar C, Elling W (2004) Radial growth of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] at the Coulissenhieb Site in relation to environmental conditions and comparison with sites in the Fichtelgebirge and Erzgebirge. Ecol Stud 172:291–311Google Scholar
  8. Douglass AE (1939) Crossdating in Dendrochronology. J For 39:825–832Google Scholar
  9. Eckstein D (1969) Entwicklung und Anwendung der Dendrochronologie zur Alterbestimmung der Siedlung Haithbau. Diss. University Hamburg, p 113Google Scholar
  10. Eckstein D, Krause C, Bauch J (1989) Dendroecological investigation of spruce trees [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] of different damage and canopy classes. Holzforschung 43:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feliksik E (1972) Dendroclimatic studies of spruce (Picea excelsa L.). Part I. Studies of spruce in Gasienicowy Forest in the Tatra Mountains. Acta Agric Et Silv Series Silvestris 12:71–83 (in Polish, summary in English)Google Scholar
  12. Feliksik E, Wilczyński S (2000a) Dendroclimatological analysis of the Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] from the Beskid Śląski Mountains. Zpravodaj Beskydy”Vliv imisi na lesy a lesni hospodářstvi Beskyd”. Edični středisko MZLU v Brne 13:161–170Google Scholar
  13. Feliksik E, Wilczyński S (2000b) Climate impact on the radial growth of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] from the Ustroń Forest District. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej im. H. Kołłątaja w Krakowie. Leśnictwo 29:13–23Google Scholar
  14. Feliksik E, Wilczyński S (2001) The influence of temperature and rainfall on the increment width of native and foreign tree species from the Istebna Forest District. Folia Forestalia Pol, Ser A– For 43:103–114Google Scholar
  15. Fritts HC (1976) Tree-rings and climate. Academic Press, London, p567Google Scholar
  16. Fritts HC (1996) Quick help for PRECON. User manual. University of Arizona, Tucson, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  17. Giertych M (1973) A contribution to the discussion on the range and origin of Norway spruce in Poland. Sylwan 10:14–25 (in Polish, summary in English)Google Scholar
  18. Grissino-Mayer HD (2001) Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Res 57:205–221Google Scholar
  19. Guiot J (1993) The Bootstrapped response function. Tree Ring Bull 51:39–41Google Scholar
  20. Holmes RL (1984) Dendrochronology program library. Users manual. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, p 51Google Scholar
  21. Holmes RL (1986) Quality control of crossdating and measuring. A users manual for program COFECHA. In: Holmes RL, Adams RK, Fritts HC (eds) Tree-ring chronologies of western North America: California, eastern Oregon and northern Great Basin. Chronology series VI. University Of Arizona, Tucson, pp 41–49Google Scholar
  22. Huber B (1943) Über die Sicherheit jahrring-chronologischer Datierung. Holz Roh- und Werkstoff 6:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahle HP, Spiecker H (1996) Adaptability of radial growth of Norway spruce to climate variations: results of a site-specific Dendroecological study in high elevetions of the Black Forest (Germany). Radiocarbon 38:785–801Google Scholar
  24. Kondracki J (2002) Regional geography of Poland PWN. Warszawa, p 440 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  25. Koprowski M, Zielski A (2002) Pointer years of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karsten] in Olsztyn Lake District. Sylwan 11:29–39. (in Polish, abstract and summary in English)Google Scholar
  26. Koprowski M, Zielski A (2003) Increment pattern in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karsten] in the gradient of continentality. Ecol Questions 3:113–117Google Scholar
  27. Mäkinen H, Nojd P, Mielikäinen K (2000) Climatic signal in annual growth variation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) along a transect from central Finland to the Arctic timberline. Can J For Res 30:769–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mäkinen H, Nojd P, Mielikäinen K (2001) Climatic signal in annual growth variation in damaged and healthy stands of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] in southern Finland. Trees 15:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mäkinen H, Nöjd P, Kahle H-P, Neumann U, Tveite B, Mielikäinen K, Röhle H, Spiecker H (2003) Large-scale climatic variability and radial increment variation of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in central and northern Europe. Trees 17:173–184Google Scholar
  30. Meyer FD, Bräker OU (2001) Climate response in dominant and suppressed spruce trees, Picea abies (L.) Karst., on subalpine and lower montana site in Switzerland. Ecoscience 8:105–114Google Scholar
  31. Miina J (2000) Dependence of tree-ring, earlywood and latewood indices of Scots pine and norway spruce on climatic factors in eastern Finland. Ecol Model 132:259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riemer T (1994) Über die Varianz von Jahrringbreiten. Statistische Methoden für die Auswertung der jährlichen Dickenzuwächse von Bäumen unter sich ändernden Lebensbedingungen. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd. 121. Gottingen, p 375Google Scholar
  33. Sander C, Eckstein D, Kyncl J, Dobry J (1995) The growth of spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] in the Krkonoce (Giant) – Mts. as indicated by ring width and wood density. Ann Sci For 52:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt-Vogt H (1977) Die Fichte. Band I. Taxonomie. Verbreitung. Morphologie. Ökologie. Waldgesellschaft. Verlag Paul Parey. Hamburg und Berlin, p 647Google Scholar
  35. Schweingruber FH (1983) Der Jahrring. Standort, Methodik, Zeit und Klima in der Dendrochronologie. Bern, Stuttgart. Verl. P. Haupt., p 234Google Scholar
  36. Schweingruber FH, Eckstein D, Serre-Bachet F, Braeker OU (1990) Identification, presentation and interpretation of event years and pointer years in dendrochronology. Dendrochronologia 8–9:9–38Google Scholar
  37. Skre O, Nes K (1996) Combined effects of elevated winter temperatures and CO2 on Norway spruce seedlings. Silva Fenn 30:135–143Google Scholar
  38. Środoń A (1967) Norway spruce in the Quarternary Poland. Acta Paleobotanica, vol. VIII. Nr 2. Institute of Botany, Kraków, p 59(in Polish, summary in English)Google Scholar
  39. Szychowska-Krąpiec E (1998) Spruce chronology from Mt Pilsko area (Żywiec Beskid Range) 1641–1995 AD. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Earth Sci 46:75–86Google Scholar
  40. Vitas A (2004) Tree rings of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karsten] in Lithuania as drought indicators: dendroecologica approach. Polish J Ecol 2:201–210Google Scholar
  41. Wilczyński S, Krąpiec M, Szychowska-Krąpiec E, Zielski A (2001) Dendroclimatological regions of the Scots pine in Poland. Sylwan 8:53–61. (in Polish, abstract in English)Google Scholar
  42. Wilson RJS, Hopfmueller M (2001) Dendrochronological investigations of Norway spruce along an elevational transect in the Bavarian Forest, Germany. Dendrochronologia 19:67–79Google Scholar
  43. Zielski A, Koprowski M (2001) Dendrochronological analysis of annual growth in the Norway spruce of Olsztyn Lake District. Sylwan 7:65–73. (in Polish, abstract in English).Google Scholar
  44. Zielski A, Koprowski M (2002) Annual variation of ring width in Norway spruce–Picea abies (L.) Karsten in Olsztyn Lakeland. Ecol Questions 2:33–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dendrochronological LaboratoryInstitute of Ecology and Environment Protection, Nicolaus Copernicus UniversityTorunPoland

Personalised recommendations