Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 42–52 | Cite as

Genotypic variation in drought response of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth): leaf and root morphology and carbon partitioning

  • Stella Aspelmeier
  • Christoph Leuschner
Original Article

Abstract

This study investigates the drought response of four genotypes of Betula pendula with a focus on leaf and root morphological traits, leaf phenology and carbon partitioning between shoot and root. Potted one-year-old clonal plants of four genotypes from regions with low to high annual rainfall (550–1270 mm year−1) were subjected to drought periods of 12–14 weeks in two subsequent years. Well-watered control plants of the four genotypes differed significantly with respect to total leaf area per plant (LA) and specific leaf area (SLA), whereas differences in total fine root surface area (RA), root specific area (SRA), and the fine root:leaf mass ratio (FR:LM) were not significant. Highest LA and SLA were found in the clone originating from the driest environment. In complementary physiological investigations this clone was found to have the highest water use as well which was interpreted as competitive superiority in terms of water consumption. Drought resulted in an increase in SLA in all genotypes, and a decrease in LA. Leaf area reduction was more pronounced in the genotypes from high than in those from low rainfall origin. The ratio of total root to leaf surfaces remained more or less constant after drought application despite an increase in FR:LM. This is explained by a decrease in SRA resulting from a reduced abundance of very small fine rootlets (diameter <0.2 mm) in the drought-treated plants. The loss in total root surface area due to a reduction in finest root mass was compensated for by a relative increase in total root dry mass per plant. Comparison of results from the first and second drought period indicated a marked influence of timing of drought, root system size, and putative root limitation on plant drought response. We conclude that leaf and root morphology, the total leaf and root surfaces, and the morphological response to drought in birch are to a large extent under genetic control.

Keywords

Drought stress Genotypic variation Leaf morphology Root morphology Root:shoot ratio 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the German Science Foundation (DFG) offered by a grant to C.L.

References

  1. Abrams MD (1994) Genotypic and phenotypic variation of stress adaptions in temperate tree species: a review of several case studies. Tree Physiol 14:833–842PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams MD, Mostoller SA (1995) Gas exchange, leaf structure and nitrogen in contrasting successional tree species growing in open and understory sites during a drought. Tree Physiol 15:361–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndt SK, Clifford SC, Wanek W, Jones HG, Popp M (2001) Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress. Tree Physiol 21:705–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspelmeier S (2001) Genotypic variation in drought response of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Göttingen. Published online at http://webdoc.gwdg.de/diss/2002/aspelmeier
  5. Aspelmeier S, Leuschner C (2004) Genotypic variation in drought response of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth): leaf water status and carbon gain. Tree Physiol 24(5):517–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Backes K (1996) Der Wasserhaushalt vier verschiedener Baumarten der Heide-Wald-Sukzession. Ph.D. Thesis, University of GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazzaz FA (1996) Plants in changing environments. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell G, Lechowicz MJ (1994) Spatial heterogeneity at small scales and how plants respond to it. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RP (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 391–414Google Scholar
  9. Cowan IR (1982) Water use and optimization of carbon assimilation. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology. 2. Physiological plantecology, vol 12, pp 589–630Google Scholar
  10. Dickson RE, Tomlinson PT (1996) Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Ann Sci Forest 53:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas und der Alpen. Ulmer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  12. Epron D, Dreyer E (1996) Starch and soluble carbohydrates in leaves of water-stressed oak saplings. Ann Sci Forest 53:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitter AH (1994) Architecture and biomass allocation as components of the plastic response of root systems to soil heterogeneity. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RP (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 305–323Google Scholar
  14. Fitter AH (1996) Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. Dekker, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  15. Fort C, Muller F, Label P, Granier A, Dreyer E (1998) Stomatal conductance, growth and root signaling in Betula pendula seedlings subjected to partial soil drying. Tree Physiol 18:769–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Plazaola JI, Becerril JM (2000) Effects of droughton photoprotective mechanisms in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings from different provenances. Trees 14:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 32:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregorius HR, Kleinschmit JRG (1999) The environmental dichotomy of adaption and the role of genetic diversity. Silvae Genet 48(3–4):193–199Google Scholar
  19. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pittermann J (2000) Drought experience and cavitation resistance in six shrubs from the Great Basin, Utah. Basic Appl Ecol 1:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hertel D (1999) Das Feinwurzelsystem von Rein- und Mischbeständen der Rotbuche: Struktur, Dynamik und interspezifische Konkurrenz. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kassel. Vol. 317 of Dissertationes Botanicae, J. Cramer, Berlin StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  21. Holopainen T, Kärenlampi L (1997) Variation in ozone sensitivity among clones of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens. Environ Pollut 95(1):37–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibrahim L, Proe MF, Cameron AD (1997) Main effects of nitrogen supply and drought stress upon whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar. Can J Forest Res 27:1413–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonasson S, Medrano H, Flexas J (1997) Variation in leaf longevity of Pistacia lentiscus and its relationship to sex and drought stress inferred from leaf δ13C. Funct Ecol 11:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joslin JD, Wolfe MH, Hanson PJ (2000) Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems. New Phytol 147:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kikuzawa K (1991) A cost–benefit analysis of leaf habit and leaf longevity of trees and their geographical pattern. Am Nat 138(5):1250–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leuschner C, Hertel D, Coners H, Büttner V (2001) Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia 126:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li C (1998) Some aspects of leaf water relations in four provenances of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings. Forest Ecol Manage 111:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li C, Berninger F, Koskela J, Sonninen E (2000) Drought responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:231–238Google Scholar
  29. Lösch R (2001) Wasserhaushalt der Pflanzen.Quelle & Meyer Verlag, WiebelsheimGoogle Scholar
  30. Mäkelä A, Berninger F, Hari P (1996) Optimal control of gas exchange during drought: theoretical analysis. Ann Bot-London 77:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marmann P (1998) Der interne Stickstoffkreislauf von Esche (Fraxinus excelsior) und Birke (Betula pendula) bei unterschielicher Wasserversorgung. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität BayreuthGoogle Scholar
  32. Mooney HA (1986) Photosynthesis. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford, pp 345–373Google Scholar
  33. Munns R, Passioura JB, Guo J, Chazen O, Cramer GR (2000) Water relations and leaf expansion: importance of time scale. J Exp Bot 51:1495–1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Niinemets Ü, Kull O (1998) Stoichiometry of foliar carbon constituents varies along light gradients in temperate woody canopies: implications for foliage morphological plasticity. Tree Physiol 18:467–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Osorio J, Osorio ML, Chaves MM, Pereira JS (1998) Water deficits are more important in delaying growth than in changing patterns of carbon allocation in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiol 18:363–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pääkkönen E, Günthardt-Georg MS, Holopainen T (1998a) Responses of leaf processes in a sensitive birch (Betula pendula Roth) clone to ozone combined with drought. Ann Bot-London 82:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pääkkönen E, Vahala J, Pohjola M, Holopainen T, Kärenlampi L (1998b) Physiological, stomatal and ultrastructural ozone responses in birch (Betula pendula Roth) are modified by water stress. Plant Cell Environ 21:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmroth S, Berninger E, Nikinmaa E, Lloyd J, Pulkkinen P, Hari P (1999) Structural adaptation rather than water conservation was observed in Scots pine over a range of wet to dry climates. Oecologia 121:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan Y, Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Pitelka LF, Hibbard K, Pierce LL, Running SW, Ojima DS, Parton WJ, Schimel DS, other VEMAP members (1998) Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP). Oecologia 114(3):389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pita P, Pardos JA (2001) Growth, leaf morphology, water use and tissue water relations of Eucalyptus globulus clones in response to water deficit. Tree Physiol 21:599–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Prentice IC (1993) Climate change – process and production. Nature 363:209–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prentice IC, Bartlein PJ, Webb T (1991) Vegetation and climate change in eastern North America since the last glacial maximum. Ecology 72:2038–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rees JCJ, Comerford NB (1990) The role of woody roots of slash pine seedlings in water and potassium absorption. Can J Forest Res 20:1183–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reich PB, Uhl C, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1991) Leaf life span as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 amazonian tree species. Oecologia 86:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schulte M (1992) Saisonale und interanuelle Variabilität des CO 2-Gaswechsels von Buchen (Fagus sylvatica L.) – Bestimmung von C-Bilanzen mit Hilfe eines empirischen Modells. Ph.D. Thesis, Universityof GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  46. Souch CA, Stephens W (1998) Growth, productivity and water use in three hybrid poplar clones. Tree Physiol 18:829–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Steudle E (2000) Water uptake by roots: an integration of views. Plant Soil 226:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor G, Davies WJ (1986) Yield turgor of growing leaves of Betula and Acer. New Phytol 104:347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas FM (2000) Growth and water relations of four deciduous tree species (Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl., Q. pubescens Willd., Sorbusaria [L.] Cr.) occurring at Central-European tree-line sites on shallow calcarous soils: physiological reactions of seedlings to severe drought. Flora 195:104–115Google Scholar
  50. Thompson K (1987) The resource ratio hypothesis and the meaning of competition. Funct Ecol 1:297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tilman D (1980) Resources: a graphical–mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am Nat 116:362–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tognetti R, Johnson JD, Michelozzi M (1995) The response of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings from two Italian populations to drought and recovery. Trees 9:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Gebre GM, Todd DE (1998) Drought resistance of two hybrid Populus clones grown in a large-scale plantation. Tree Physiol 18:653–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuomela K (1997) Physiological and morphological responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances to water availability in tropical drylands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang JR, Hawkins CDB, Letchford T (1998) Relative growth rate and biomass allocation of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) polations under different soil moisture and nutrient regimes. Can J Forest Res 28:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang JW, Feng Z, Gregg GM, Schumann CM (1997) Carbon isotopic composition, gas exchange, and growth of three populations of ponderosa pine differing in drought tolerance. Tree Physiol 17:461–466PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Plant Ecology Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute for Plant SciencesUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations