Trees

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 452–459 | Cite as

Linkage between seasonal gas exchange and hydraulic acclimation in the top canopy leaves of Fagus trees in a mesic forest in Japan

  • Akira Uemura
  • Atsushi Ishida
  • Dennis J. Tobias
  • Nobuya Koike
  • Yoosuke Matsumoto
Original Article

Abstract

We investigated how leaf gas exchange and hydraulic properties acclimate to increasing evaporative demand in mature beech trees, Fagus crenata Blume and Fagus japonica Maxim., growing in their natural habitat. The measurements in the top canopy leaves were conducted using a 16-m-high scaffolding tower over two growing seasons. The daily maxima of net photosynthetic rate for the early growing season were close to the annual maximum value (11.9 μmol m−2 s−1 in F. crenata and 7.7 μmol m−2 s−1 in F. japonica). The daily maxima of water vapor stomatal conductance were highest in the summer, approximately 0.3 mol m−2 s−1 in F. crenata and 0.15 mol m−2 s−1 in F. japonica. From the early growing season to the summer season, the leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit increased and the daily minima of leaf water potentials decreased. However, there was no loss of leaf turgor in the summer as a result of effective osmotic adjustment. Both the soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance per unit leaf area and the twig hydraulic conductivity simultaneously increased in the summer, probably as a result of production of new vessels in the xylem. These results suggest that both osmotic adjustment and increased hydraulic conductance resulted in the largest diurnal maximum of stomatal conductance in the summer, resulting in the lowest relative stomatal limitation on net photosynthetic rate, although the leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit was highest. These results indicate that even in a mesic forest, in which excessive hydraulic stress does not occur, the seasonal acclimation of hydraulic properties at both the single leaf and whole plant levels are important for plant carbon gain.

Keywords

Fagus crenata Fagus japonica Water relations Stomatal conductance Photosynthesis 

References

  1. Aasamaa K, Sõber A, Hartung W, Niinemets Ü (2002) Rate of stomatal opening, shoot hydraulic conductance and photosynthetic characteristics in relation to leaf abscisic acid concentration in six temperate deciduous trees. Tree Physiol 22:267–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Améglio T, Acointe A, Bondet C, Cochard H (2002) Winter embolism, mechanisms of xylem hydraulic conductivity recovery and springtime growth patterns in walnut and peach trees. Tree Physiol 22:1211–1220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aranda I, Gil L, Pardos J (1996) Seasonal water relations of three broadleaved species (Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. and Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) in a mixed stand in the centre of the Iberian Peninsula. Fore Ecol Manage 84:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aranda I, Gil L, Pardos JA (2000) Water relations and gas exchange in Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. in a mixed stand at their southern limit of distribution in Europe. Trees 14:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Backes K, Leuschner C (2000) Leaf water relations of competitive Fagus sylvatica and Quercus petraea trees during 4 years differing in soil drought. Can J For Res 30:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker P, Tyree MT, Tsuda M (1999) Hydraulic conductances of angiosperms versus conifers: similar transport sufficiency at the whole-plant level. Tree Physiol 19:445–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodribb TJ, Hill RS (2000) Increases in water potential gradient reduce xylem conductivity in whole plants. Evidence from a low-pressure conductivity method. Plant Physiol 123:1021–1028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochard H, Martin R, Gross P, Bogeat-Triboulot MB (2000) Temperature effects on hydraulic conductance and water relations of Quercus robur L. J Exp Bot 51:1255–1259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochard H, Lemoine D, Améglio T, Granier A (2001) Mechanisms of xylem recovery from winter embolism in Fagus sylvatica. Tree Physiol 21:27–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33:317–345Google Scholar
  11. Hacke U, Sauter JJ (1995) Vulnerability of xylem to embolism in relation to leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in Fagus sylvatica F. purpurea and Populus balsamifera. J Exp Bot 46:1177–1183Google Scholar
  12. Heath J (1998) Stomata of trees growing in CO2-enriched air show reduced sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit and drought. Plant Cell Environ 21:1077–1088Google Scholar
  13. Hubbard RM, Bond BJ, Ryan MG (1999) Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiol 19:165–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hubbard RM, Ryan MG, Stiller V, Sperry JS (2001) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. Plant Cell Environ 24:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishida A, Yamamura Y, Hori Y (1992) Roles of leaf water potential and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in water use by understorey woody plants. Ecol Res 7:213–223Google Scholar
  16. Jones HG (1992) Plant and microclimate, 2nd edn. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Koike T, Maruyama Y (1998) Comparative ecophysiology of the leaf photosynthetic traits in Japanese beech grown in provenances facing the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan (in Japanese). J Phytogeogr Taxon 46:23–28Google Scholar
  18. Kolb KJ, Sperry JS, Lamont BB (1996) A method for measuring xylem hydraulic conductance and embolism in entire root and shoot systems. J Exp Bot 47:1805–1810Google Scholar
  19. Leuschner Ch, Backes K, Hertel D, Schipka F, Schmitt U, Terborg O, Runge M (2001) Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years. For Ecol Manage 149:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S (1991) Three different methods for measuring xylem cavitation and embolism: a comparison. Ann Bot 67:417–424Google Scholar
  21. Magnani F, Borghetti M (1995) Interpretation of seasonal changes of xylem embolism and plant hydraulic resistance in Fagus sylvatica. Plant Cell Environ 18:689–696Google Scholar
  22. Maherali H, DeLucia EH (2001) Influence of climate-driven shifts in biomass allocation on water transport and storage in ponderosa pine. Oecologia 129:481–491Google Scholar
  23. Maruyama K, Toyama Y (1987) Effect of water stress on photosynthesis and transpiration in three tall deciduous trees. J Jpn For Soc 69:165–170Google Scholar
  24. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Jackson P, Holbrook NM, Gutiérrez MV, Cavelier J (1995) Environmental and physiological regulation of transpiration in tropical forest gap species: the influence of boundary layer and hydraulic properties. Oecologia 101:514–522Google Scholar
  25. Mencuccini M, Grace J (1995) Climate influences the leaf area/sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiol 15:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgan JM (1984) Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plant. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35:299–319Google Scholar
  27. Nardini A, Salleo S (2000) Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? Trees 15:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearcy RW, Schulze ED, Zimmermann R (1989) Measurement of transpiration and leaf conductance. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer J, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology: field methods and instrumentation, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 137–160Google Scholar
  29. Peuke AD, Schraml C, Hartung W, Rennenberg H (2002) Identification of drought-sensitive beech ecotypes by physiological parameters. New Phytol 154:373–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raftoyannis Y, Radoglou K (2002) Physiological responses of beech and sessile oak in a natural mixed stand during a dry summer. Ann Bot 89:723–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Robichaux RH (1984) Variation in the tissue water relations of two sympatric Hawaiian Dubautia species and their natural hybrid. Oecologia 65:75–81Google Scholar
  32. Saito H, Kakubari Y (1999) Spatial and seasonal variations in photosynthetic properties within a Beech (Fagus crenata Blume) crown. J For Res 4:27–34Google Scholar
  33. Saito T, Tanaka T, Tanabe H, Matsumoto Y, Morikawa Y (2003) Variations in transpiration rate and leaf cell turgor maintenance in saplings of deciduous broad-leaved tree species common in cool temperate forests in Japan. Tree Physiol 23:59–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Saliendra NZ, Sperry JS, Comstock JP (1995) Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196:357–366Google Scholar
  35. Salleo S (1983) Water relations parameters of two Sicilian species of Senecio (Groundsel) measured by the pressure bomb technique. New Phytol 95:179–188Google Scholar
  36. Sperry JS (1993) Winter xylem embolism and spring recovery in Betula cordifolia, Fagus grandifolia, Abies balsamea and Picea rubens. In: Borghetti M, Grace J, Raschi A (eds) Water transport in plants under climatic stress, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 86–98Google Scholar
  37. Sperry JS (2000) Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange. Agric For Meteorol 104:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sperry JS, Pockman WT (1993) Limitation of transpiration by hydraulic conductance and xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant Cell Environ 16:279–287Google Scholar
  39. Sperry JS, Donnelly JR, Tyree MT (1988) A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant Cell Environ 11:35–40Google Scholar
  40. Sperry JS, Adler FR, Campbell GS, Comstock JP (1998) Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results form a model. Plant Cell Environ 21:347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steudle E, Peterson CA (1998) How does water get through roots? J Exp Bot 49:775–788Google Scholar
  42. Tschaplinski TJ, Gebre GM, Shirshac TL (1998) Osmotic potential of several hardwood species as affected by manipulation of throughfall precipitation in an upland oak forest during a dry year. Tree Physiol 18:291–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tyree MT (2003) Hydraulic limits on tree performance: transpiration, carbon gain and growth of trees. Trees 17:95–100Google Scholar
  44. Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119:345–360Google Scholar
  45. Tyree MT, Velez V, Dalling JW (1998) Growth dynamics of root and shoot hydraulic conductance in seedlings of five neotropical tree species: scaling to show possible adaptation to differing light regimes. Oecologia 114:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uemura A, Ishida A, Nakano T, Terashima I, Tanabe H, Matsumoto Y (2000) Acclimation of leaf characteristics of Fagus species to previous-year and current-year solar irradiances. Tree Physiol 20:945–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Utsumi Y, Sano Y, Fujikawa S, Funada R, Ohtani J (1998) Visualization of cavitated vessels in winter and refilled vessels in spring in diffuse-porous trees by cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Plant Physiol 117:1463–1471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wan X, Zwiazek JJ, Lieffers VJ, Landhäusser SM (2001) Hydraulic conductance in aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings exposed to low root temperatures. Tree Physiol 21:691–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitehead D (1998) Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiol 18:633–644PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Uemura
    • 1
  • Atsushi Ishida
    • 1
  • Dennis J. Tobias
    • 1
  • Nobuya Koike
    • 1
  • Yoosuke Matsumoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant EcologyForestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI)TsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations