Advertisement

Pediatric Nephrology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 477–483 | Cite as

Management in children of mild postnatal renal dilatation but without vesicoureteral reflux

  • Nigel G. Anderson
  • Jesse Fischer
  • Diane Leighton
  • James Hector-Taylor
  • Rachael L. McEwing
Original Article

Abstract

Infants with mild postnatal renal dilatation but without vesicoureteral reflux pose a challenge. For how long and in what way should they be followed? From May 1989 to December 2006, we prospectively followed 1,795 pregnancies in which the foetal renal pelvis measured 4 mm or greater. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and renal ultrasound were performed on 1,315 infants at 6 weeks of age. Our study group comprised 208 (167 male) infants with normal VCUG findings who had a renal pelvis of 6–11 mm. We followed them for 1–17 years (mean 11 years). Medical and radiological records were reviewed to determine any urinary symptoms and final outcome. They underwent, on average, four further imaging tests. The renal dilatation had resolved by 24 months in approximately 70%. Urinary tract infection (UTI) developed in 16 (8%). Calyceal dilatation was more likely in those developing UTI (P = 0.02). Twenty-two (10.6%) had a radiologically demonstrated urinary tract abnormality. Of the five who had renal scarring or severe obstruction, four became symptomatic. Most infants with mild postnatal renal dilatation can be investigated with only one further sonogram at 24 months of age. Mild postnatal renal dilatation is associated with subsequent UTI or renal tract abnormality in 18%. Severe renal abnormality occurred in 2.4%.

Keywords

Vesicoureteral reflux Ureteral obstruction Ultrasonography Prenatal Neonatal screening Neonatal hydronephrosis Mild postnatal renal dilatation Urinary tract infection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the sonographers over the years who have scanned these children, the paediatricians who have faced the difficulties in deciding how to treat the children, and, especially, the parents for their forbearance. We particularly acknowledge the work of Dr. George Abbott. We thank Judith Dawson for preparing the manuscript and Jim Stankovich for helping to prepare Fig. 2.

References

  1. 1.
    Katzir Z, Witzling M, Nikolov G, Gvirtz G, Arbel E, Kohelet D, Boaz M, Smetana S, Lorberboym M (2005) Neonates with extra-renal pelvis: the first 2 years. Pediatr Nephrol 20:763–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dremsek PA, Gindl K, Voitl P, Strobl R, Hafner E, Geissler W, Hruby W, Sacher M (1997) Renal pyelectasis in fetuses and neonates: diagnostic value of renal pelvis diameter in pre- and postnatal sonographic screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1017–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joseph VT (2006) The management of renal conditions in the perinatal period. Early Hum Dev 82:313–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouzada MC, Oliveira EA, Pereira AK, Leite HV, Rodrigues AM, Fagundes LA, Gonçalves RP, Parreiras R (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of postnatal renal pelvic diameter as a predictor of uropathy: a prospective study. Pediatr Radiol 34:798–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clautice-Engle T, Anderson NG, Allan RB, Abbott GD (1995) Diagnosis of obstructive hydronephrosis in infants: comparison sonograms performed 6 days and 6 weeks after birth. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:963–967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avni FE, Hall M, Rypens F (2001) The postnatal work-up of congenital uronephropathies. In: Baert AL, Sartor K (eds) Pediatric uroradiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 321–336Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acton C, Pahuja M, Opie G, Woodward A (2003) A 5-year audit of 778 neonatal renal scans (part 1): perplexing pyelectasis and suggested protocol for investigation. Australas Radiol 47:349–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ismaili K, Avni FE, Piepsz A, Wissing KM, Cochat P, Aubert D, Hall M (2004) Current management of infants with fetal renal pelvis dilation: a survey by French-speaking pediatric nephrologists and urologists. Pediatr Nephrol 19:966–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ismaili K, Avni FE, Wissing KM, Hall M, Brussels Free University Perinatal Nephrology Study Group (2004) Long-term clinical outcome of infants with mild and moderate fetal pyelectasis: validation of neonatal ultrasound as a screening tool to detect significant nephrouropathies. J Pediatr 144:759–765Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson NG, Abbott GD, Mogridge N, Allan RB, Maling TM, Wells JE (1997) Vesicoureteric reflux in the newborn: relationship to fetal renal pelvic diameter. Pediatr Nephrol 11:610–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Bruyn R, Marks SD (2008) Postnatal investigation of fetal renal disease. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 13:133–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ransley PG, Dhillon HK, Gordon I, Duffy PG, Dillon MJ, Barratt TM (1990) The postnatal management of hydronephrosis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound. J Urol 144:584–587; discussion 593–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riccabona M (2004) Assessment and management of newborn hydronephrosis. World J Urol 22:73–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merlini L, Parvex P, Anooshiravani-Dumont M, Girardin E, Hanquinet S (2007) Postnatal management of isolated mild pelvic dilatation detected in antenatal period. Acta Paediatr 96:1131–1134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson NG, Allan RB, Abbott GD (2004) Fluctuating size of fetal or neonatal renal pelvis: marker of high grade vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 19:749–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McIlroy PJ, Abbott GD, Anderson NG, Turner JG, Mogridge N, Wells JE (2000) Outcome of primary vesicoureteric reflux detected following fetal renal pelvic dilatation. J Paediatr Child Health 36:569–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gramellini D, Fieni S, Caforio E, Benassi G, Bedocchi L, Beseghi U, Benassi L (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of significant postnatal nephrouropathy: second versus third trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toiviainen-Salo S, Garel L, Grignon A, Dubois J, Rypens F, Boisvert J, Perreault G, Decarie JC, Filiatrault D, Lapierre C, Miron MC, Bechard N (2004) Fetal hydronephrosis: is there hope for consensus? Pediatr Radiol 34:519–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen-Overbeek TE, Wijngaard-Boom P, Ursem NT, Hop WC, Wladimiroff JW, Wolffenbuttel KP (2005) Mild renal pyelectasis in the second trimester: determination of cut-off levels for postnatal referral. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:378–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plant ND, Hornung RJ, Coulthard MG, Keir MJ, Matthews JN, Robson SC (2005) Does antenatal pelvic dilation predict renal scarring? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90:F339–F340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mårild S, Jodal U (1998) Incidence rate of first-time symptomatic urinary tract infection in children under 6 years of age. Acta Paediatr 87:549–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harding LJ, Malone PS, Wellesley DG (1999) Antenatal minimal hydronephrosis: is its follow-up an unnecessary cause of concern? Prenat Diagn 19:701–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dacher N, Mandell J, Lebowitz RL (1992) Urinary tract infections in infants in spite of prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis. Pediatr Radiol 22:401–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Darge K (2008) Voiding urosonography with US contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. II. Comparison with radiological examinations. Pediatr Radiol 38:54–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lim R (2009) Vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection: evolving practices and current controversies in pediatric imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1197–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IPNA 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel G. Anderson
    • 1
  • Jesse Fischer
    • 2
  • Diane Leighton
    • 3
  • James Hector-Taylor
    • 4
  • Rachael L. McEwing
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Academic RadiologyUniversity of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch HospitalChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Resident Medical Officers’ UnitChristchurch HospitalChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Radiology DepartmentChristchurch HospitalChristchurchNew Zealand
  4. 4.Department of PaediatricsChristchurch HospitalChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations