Pediatric end stage renal disease health-related quality of life differs by modality: a PedsQL ESRD analysis
- 495 Downloads
We previously validated the 34-item PedsQL 3.0 End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Module designed to measure pediatric ESRD-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents receiving maintenance dialysis or with a renal transplant. The study reported here was undertaken to assess for potential HRQOL differences between ESRD modality in children with ESRD and their parents using the PedsQL 3.0 ESRD Module. Parents of patients with a renal transplant reported a significantly higher HRQOL for their children than parents of pediatric patients receiving dialysis on all ESRD Module Scales except the Perceived Physical Appearance Scale, with the majority of the effect sizes in the medium range. Pediatric renal transplant patients self-reported comparable HRQOL to pediatric patients receiving dialysis across the ESRD Module Scales, with the exception of the Family and Peer Interaction Scale, in which pediatric renal transplant patients self-reported significantly higher HRQOL than pediatric patients receiving dialysis. Our cross-sectional data suggest that parents of children with ESRD observe a positive impact from renal transplantation on the majority of HRQOL domains compared to dialysis, whereas children self-report generally non-significant small effect size differences in favor of renal transplantation. These findings suggest that the PedsQL ESRD 3.0 Module may be used to identify ESRD- and modality-specific challenges that impact pediatric patient HRQOL.
KeywordsChildren Dialysis End-stage renal disease Health-related quality of life Renal transplant
This work was supported (SLG, NMR and JWV) by the Franklin McDonald/Fresenius Medical Care Young Investigator Grant from the National Kidney Foundation. Competing Interests: Dr. Varni holds the copyright and the trademark for the PedsQL and receives financial compensation from the Mapi Research Trust, which is a nonprofit research institute that charges distribution fees to for-profit companies that use the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.
- 5.Goldstein SL, Graham N, Warady BA, Seikaly M, McDonald R, Burwinkle TM, Limbers CA, Varni JW (2008) Measuring health-related quality of life in children with ESRD: Performance of the Generic and ESRD-Specific Instrument of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™ ). Am J Kidney Dis 51:285–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Aday LA (1996) Designing and conducting health surveys: A comprehensive guide, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fowler FJ (1995) Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation, 1st edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 8.Schwarz N, Sudman N (1996) Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fairclough DL (2002) Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials: Interdisciplinary statistics, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hollingshead AB (1975) Four Factor Index of Social Status. Yale University, New Haven CTGoogle Scholar
- 11.Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. 2nd edn. Houghton-Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 12.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 21.Collins AJ, Foley R, Herzog C, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Ishani A, Kasiske B, Liu J, Mau LW, McBean M, Murray A, St Peter W, Xue J, Fan Q, Guo H, Li Q, Li S, Peng Y, Qiu Y, Roberts T, Skeans M, Snyder J, Solid C, Wang C, Weinhandl E, Zaun D, Zhang R, Arko C, Chen SC, Dalleska F, Daniels F, Dunning S, Ebben J, Frazier E, Hanzlik C, Johnson R, Sheets D, Wang X, Forrest B, Constantini E, Everson S, Eggers P, Agodoa L (2008) Excerpts from the United States Renal Data System 2007 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis 51:S1–320Google Scholar