Pediatric Nephrology

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1115–1122 | Cite as

Non-invasive evaluation of voiding function in asymptomatic primary school children

Original Article


This study aimed to evaluate the voiding characteristics of primary school children by using questionnaires and non-invasive diagnostic tools. The voiding characteristics of 212 healthy children in two primary schools were evaluated with ultrasound for bladder wall thickness (BWT) in association with the Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score (PLUTSS), familial questionnaire, uroflowmetry (UF) and urinalysis. Most of the children (70%) had achieved urinary and fecal continence between the ages of 18 months and 36 months. Twenty-five per cent of heathy children void fewer than four times or more than seven times per day. Ninety percent of children had a PLUTSS within normal ranges (< 9). Fifteen percent of patients had a uroflowmetric pattern other than bell-shaped. The peak and average flow rates were higher in girls. Enuresis nocturna was detected in 10% of children. None of the children had documented urinary tract infection. The average BWT from posterior wall at full bladder in healthy children was 1.1 mm. The anterior and posterior BWT measurements before and after micturition were found to be thicker in boys. Regarding the UF pattern, in post-voiding measurements in children with abnormal UF pattern, the bladder walls were thicker. Non-invasive tests in non-symptomatic children showed a range of variability, and these deviations should be kept in mind during the evaluation of voiding characteristics of a child. The symptom scoring system, with the high sensitivity and specificity rates it possesses, is one of the promising tools for this purpose.


Voiding characteristics Bladder wall thickness Symptom score Children 


  1. 1.
    Lee SD, Sohn DW, Lee JZ, Park NC, Chung MK (2000) An epidemiological study of enuresis in Korean children. BJU Int 85:869–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hellström AL, Hansson E, Hansson S, Hjälmås K, Jodal U (1990) Incontinence and micturition habits in 7-year-old Swedish school entrants. Eur J Pediatr 149:434–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nevéus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P, Hjälmås K, Bauer S, Bower W, Jørgensen TM, Rittig S, Walle JV, Yeung CK, Djurhuus JC (2006) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol 176:314–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akbal C, Genc Y, Burgu B, Ozden E, Tekgul S (2005) Dysfunctional voiding and incontinence scoring system: quantitative evaluation of incontinence symptoms in pediatric population. J Urol 173:969–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Müller L, Bergstrom T, Hellstrom M, Svensson E, Jacobsson B (2000) Standardized ultrasound method for assessing detrusor muscle thickness in children. J Urol 164:134–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mattsson SH (1994) Voiding frequency, volumes and intervals in healthy schoolchildren. Scand J Urol Nephrol 28:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farhat W, Bagli DJ, Capolicchio G, O’Reilly S, Merguerian PA, Khoury A, McLorie GA (2000) The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol 164:1011–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farhat W, McLorie GA, O’Reilly S, Khoury A, Bagli DJ (2001) Reliability of the pediatric dysfunctional voiding symptom score in monitoring response to behavioral modification. Can J Urol 8:1401–1405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Upadhyay J, Bolduc S, Bagli DJ, McLorie GA, Khoury AE, Farhat W (2003) Use of the dysfunctional voiding symptom score to predict resolution of vesicoureteral reflux in children with voiding dysfunction. J Urol 169:1842–1846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartkowski DP, Doubrava RG (2004) Ability of a normal dysfunctional voiding symptom score to predict uroflowmetry and external urinary sphincter electromyography patterns in children. J Urol 172:1980–1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chrzan R, Czernik J, Apoznanski W, Patkowski D, Siekanowicz P (2005) Uroflowmetry in children—is it necessary to repeat the study in a single patient? Eur J Pediatr Surg 15:26–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szabo L, Fegyverneki S (1995) Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal children—the Miskolc nomograms. Br J Urol 76:16–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amaro JL, Trindade Filho JC, Vercesi LA, Agostinho AD, Goldberg J, Trindade JC (1996) Urinary flow in children: correlation with age, body height and body surface area. J Urol (Paris) 102:85–86Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bower WF, Kwok B, Yeung CK (2004) Variability in normative urine flow rates. J Urol 171:2657–2659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutierrez Segura C (1996) The study of urinary flow in 3 to 14 year-old children. Urinary flow rate nomograms. Cir Pediatr 9:91–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaikh N, Abedin S, Docimo SG (2005) Can ultrasonography or uroflowmetry predict which children with voiding dysfunction will have recurrent urinary tract infections? J Urol 174:1620–1622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Müller L, Jacobsson B, Marild S, Hellstrom M (2001) Detrusor thickness in healthy children assessed by a standardized ultrasound method. J Urol 166:2364–2367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bachelard M, Sillen U, Hansson S, Hermansson G, Jodal U, Jacobsson B (1999) Urodynamic pattern in asymptomatic infants: siblings of children with vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 162:1733–1737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cvitkovic-Kuzmic A, Brkljacic B, Ivankovic D, Grga A (2002) Ultrasound assessment of detrusor muscle thickness in children with non-neuropathic bladder/sphincter dysfunction. Eur Urol 41:214–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IPNA 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hasan Serkan Dogan
    • 1
  • Burcu Akpinar
    • 2
  • Serhat Gurocak
    • 3
  • Deniz Akata
    • 2
  • Mehmet Bakkaloglu
    • 4
  • Serdar Tekgul
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUludag University Faculty of MedicineGorukleTurkey
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHacettepe University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of UrologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of UrologyHacettepe University Faculty of MedicineAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations