Advertisement

Pediatric Nephrology

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 897–904 | Cite as

Antenatally detected urinary tract abnormalities: more detection but less action

  • Meeta Mallik
  • Alan R. Watson
Original Article

Abstract

We present the findings of a prospective cohort study of babies born with antenatally detected urinary tract abnormalities (AUTAs) between 1999–2003 and compare the outcomes with those of an earlier cohort born between 1989 and 1993. All infants with a fetal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD) ≥7 mm in the third trimester or other urinary tract abnormality underwent a detailed postnatal ultrasound scan and other investigations as indicated. The incidence of AUTAs was significantly greater in the more recent cohort (7.6/1000 vs. 3/1000 live births; p < 0.05). Of the 350 infants on which we had data, 48.6% (170/350) were in the non-specific dilatation (NSD) category, and vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) was detected in 12%. Restricting investigations to those who had an APRPD ≥10 mm at >30 weeks of gestation could have reduced the number with NSD in the more recent cohort (26/115; 25%), but 25% of those with pelviureteric junction hold-up and 50% with VUR would have been missed. Significantly fewer patients in the more recent cohort underwent surgery (7 vs. 21%; p < 0.001). There is a trend towards larger APRPDs on third trimester scans being associated with more significant pathology, but there is a lot of clinical overlap. The study highlights the need for cautious antenatal counselling combined with an assurance to prospective parents that postnatal investigations will be performed in a stepwise manner based on the initial postnatal ultrasound scan and clinical findings.

Keywords

Antenatal detection Antenatal ultrasound Urinary tract abnormalities Antenatal hydronephrosis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Judith Hayes for maintaining the database and Jo Leonardi-Bee for statistical advice. We also thank the referring clinicians and radiologists who collaborated in investigation pathways.

References

  1. 1.
    Dillon E, Walton SM (1997) The antenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities: a 10 year audit of influencing factors. Br J Radiol 70:341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim EK, Song TB (1996) A study on fetal urinary tract abnormality: antenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and postnatal follow-up. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 22:569–573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S (1999) The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:446–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Owen RJT, Lamont AC, Brookes J (1996) Early management and postnatal investigation of prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis. Clin Radiol 51:173–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moorthy I, Joshi N, Cook JV, Warren M (2003) Antenatal hydronephrosis: negative predictive value of normal postnatal ultrasound-a 5-year study. Clin Radiol 58:964–970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McIlroy PJ, Abbott GD, Anderson NG, Turner JG, Mogridge N, Wells JE (2000) Outcome of primary vesicoureteric reflux detected following fetal renal pelvic dilatation. J Paediatr Child Health 36:569–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sairam S, Al-Habib A, Sasson S, Thilaganathan B (2001) Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid-trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:191–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Langer B, Simeoni U, Montoya Y, Casanova R, Schlaeder G (1996) Antenatal diagnosis of upper tract dilatation by ultrasonography. Fetal Diagn Ther 11:191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wollenberg A, Neuhaus TJ, Willi UV, Wisser J (2005) Outcome of fetal renal pelvic dilatation diagnosed during the third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:483–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, Nguyen HT (2006) Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 118:586–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson NJ, Abbott GD, Mogridge N, Allan RB, Maling TM, Wells E (1997) Vesicoureteric reflux in the newborn: relationship to fetal renal pelvic diameter. Pediatr Nephrol 11:610–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    James CA, Watson AR, Twining P, Rance CH (1998) Antenatally detected urinary tract abnormalities: changing incidence and management. Eur J Pediatr 157:508–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ismaili K, Avni FE, Hall M (2002) Results of systematic voiding cystourethrography in infants with antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation. J Pediatr 141:21–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scott JE, Wright B, Wlison G, Pearson IA, Matthews JN, Rose PG (1995) Measuring the fetal kidney with ultrasonography. Br J Urol 76:769–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen-Overbeek TE, Wijngaard-Boom P, Ursem NT, Hop WC, Wladimiroff JW, Wolffenbuttel KP (2005) Mild renal pyelectasis in the second trimester: determination of cut-off levels for postnatal referral. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farhat W, McLorie G, Geary D, Capolicchio G, Bägli D, Merguerian P, Khoury A (2000) The natural history of neonatal vesicoureteral reflux associated with antenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 164:1057–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tibballs JM, De Bruyn R (1996) Primary vesicoureteric reflux—how useful is postnatal ultrasound? Arch Dis Child 75:444–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dudley JA, Haworth JM, McGraw ME, Frank JD, Tizard EJ (1997) Clinical relevance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76:F31–F34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aksu N, Yavascan O, Kangin M, Kara OD, Aydin Y, Erdogan H, Tuncel TC, Cetinkaya E, Ozbay E, Sandikcioglu TG (2005) Postnatal management of infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1253–1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phillips DA, Watson AR, Collier J (1996) Distress and radiological investigations of the urinary tract in children. Eur J Pediatr 155:684–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ward VL (2006) Patient dose reduction during voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Radiol 36:168–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phillips DA, Watson AR, MacKinlay D (1998) Distress and the micturating cystourethrogram: does preparation help? Acta Paediatr 87:175–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salmon K, Pereira JK (2006) Brief report: optimizing children’s memory and management of an invasive medical procedure: the influence of procedural narration and distraction. J Pediatr Psychology 31:522–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agrawalla S, Pearce R, Goodman TR (2004) How to perform the perfect voiding cystourethrogram. Pediatr Radiol 34:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watson AR (1999) Management of antenatally detected urinary tract abnormalities. Curr Paediatr 9:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    International Reflux Committee (1981) Medical versus surgical treatment of primary vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatrics 67:392–400Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marra G, Barbieri G, Moioli C, Assael BM, Brumieri G, Caccamo ML (1994) Mild fetal hydronephrosis indicating vesicoureteric reflux. Arch Dis Child 70:F147–F150Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kent A, Cox D, Downey P, James SL (2000) A study of mild fetal pyelectasia-outcome and proposed strategy of management. Prenat Diagn 20:206–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walsh G, Dubbins PA (1996) Antenatal renal pelvis dilatation: a predictor of vesicoureteral reflux? AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:897–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hodson EM, Wheeler DM, Vimalchandra D, Smith GH, Craig JC (2007) Interventions for primary vesicoureteric reflux. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD001532Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Conway PH, Cnaan A, Zaoutis T, Henry BV, Grundmeier RW, Keren R (2007) Recurrent urinary tract infections in children: risk factors and association with prophylactic antimicrobials. JAMA 298:179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scott JE, Renwick M (2001) Antenatal renal pelvic measurements: what do they mean? Br J Urol Int 87:376–380Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chitty LS, Altman DG (2003) Charts of fetal size: kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn 23:891–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C, Thomas D, Vermeylen D, Avni FE (2003) Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:242–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chertin B, Pollack A, Koulikov D, Rabinowitz R, Hain D, Hadas-Halpren I, Farkas A (2006) Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 49:734–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA (2000) The long-term follow up of infants with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated non-operatively. J Urol 164:1101–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chertin B, Rolle U, Farkas A, Puri P (2002) Does delaying pyeloplasty affect renal function in children with a prenatal diagnosis of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction? Br J Urol Int 90:72–75Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aslam M, Watson AR; Trent & Anglia MCDK Study Group (2006) Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK): long-term outcomes. Arch Dis Child 91:820–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IPNA 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Children & Young People’s Kidney UnitNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations