Pediatric Nephrology

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 1077–1082

Can mycophenolate mofetil substitute cyclophosphamide treatment of pediatric lupus nephritis?

Editorial Commentary

Abstract

Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) has been the standard of care to induce remission of severe and active lupus nephritis for more than 20 years. Potential side effects are significant, and failure to achieve remission is still high. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a potential alternative to CYC, with an improved safety profile thus far. Results of two mayor randomized controlled trials in adults indicate no evidence of inferiority in patients treated with MMF, less adverse events, and higher rate of complete remission. Experience in the pediatric population is very limited. Thus far, the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability record of MMF in adults makes it an acceptable alternative to CYC in the induction phase of treatment. Early treatment is desired. Several questions remain: the optimal dose and length of induction with MMF are unknown, the effect of MMF in severe cases of lupus nephritis with renal failure at presentation is unknown, and the compliance with long-term oral treatment in the adolescent population is certainly unknown. In this review, intravenous (IV) CYC induction in the sickest patients (renal failure at presentation) is considered and/or when compliance with oral treatment cannot be established. Also, MMF induction in reliable patients with mostly preserved renal function is considered. Most likely, MMF will serve as a therapeutic bridge between the previously well-known, broad-spectrum immunosuppressive drugs and the new, targeted biological agents.

Keywords

Lupus Nephritis Induction Mycophenolate mofetil Cyclophosphamide Children 

References

  1. 1.
    Boumpas DT, Austin HA III, Vaughan EM, Klippel JH, Steinberg AD, Yarboro CH, Balow JE (1992) Controlled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide in severe lupus nephritis. Lancet 340:741–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steinberg AD, Steinberg SC (1991) Long-term preservation of renal function in patients with lupus nephritis receiving treatment that includes cyclophosphamide versus those treated with prednisone only. Arthritis Rheum 34:945–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Illei GG, Austin HA, Crane M, Colins MF, Yarboro CH, Vaughan EM, Kuroiwa T, Danning CL, Steinberg AD, Klippel JH, Balow JE, Boumpas DT (2001) Combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide plus pulse methylprednisolone improves long-term renal outcome without adding toxicity in patients with lupus nephritis. Ann Intern Med 135:248–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gourley MF, Austin HA III, Scott D, Yarboro CH, Vaughan EM, Muir J, Boumpas DT, Klippel JH, Balow JE, Steinberg AD (1996) Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 125:549–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mok CC, Lau CS, Wong RW (1998) Risk factors for ovarian failure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving cyclophosphamide therapy. Arthritis Rheum 41:831–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boumpas DT, Austin HA III, Vaughan EM, Yarboro CH, Klippel JH, Balow JE (1993) Risk for sustained amenorrhea in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide therapy. Ann Intern Med 119:366–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mok CC, Ying KY, Tsang S, Leung CY, Lee KW, Mg WL, Wong RW, Lau CS (2004) Predictors and outcome of renal flares after successful cyclophosphamide treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis. Arthritis Rheum 50:2559–2568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ioannidis JP, Boki KA, Katsorida ME, Drosos AA, Skopouli FN, Boletis JN, Moutsopoulos HM (2000) Remission, relapse, and re-remission of proliferative lupus nephritis treated with cyclophosphamide. Kidney Int 57:258–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allison AC (2005) Mechanisms of action of mycophenolate mofetil. Lupus 14:s2–s8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenz O, Fornoni A, Contreras G (2005) Defining the role of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis. Drugs 65:2429–2436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bijl M, Horst G, Bootsma H, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG (2003) Mycophenolate mofetil prevents a clinical relapse in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus at risk. Ann Rheum Dis 62:534–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Briggs WA, Choi MJ, Scheel PJ Jr (1998) Successful mycophenolate mofetil treatment of glomerular disease. Am J Kidney Dis 31:213–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dooley MA, Cosio FG, Nachman PH, Falkenhain ME, Hogan SL, Falk RJ, Hebert LA (1999) Mycophenolate mofetil therapy in lupus nephritis: clinical observations. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:833–839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan TM, Li FK, Tsang CS, Wong RW, Fang GX, Ji YL, Lau CS, Wong AK, Tong MK, Chan KW, Lai KN (2000) Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 343:1156–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan TM, Tse KC, Tang CS, Mok MY, Li FK (2005) Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:1076–1084PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ong LM, Hooi LS, Lim TO, Goh BL, Ahmad G, Ghazalli R, Teo SM, Wong HS, Tan SY, Shaariah W, Tan CC, Morad Z (2005) Randomized controlled trial of pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis. Nephrology 10:504–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ginzler EM, Dooley MA, Aranow C, Kim MY, Buyon J, Merrill JT, Petri M, Gilkeson GS, Wallace DJ, Weisman MH, Appel GB (2005) Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 353:2219–2228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D’Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, Garrido ER, Danieli MG, Abramovicz D, Blockmans D, Mathieu A, Direskeneli H, Galeazzi M, Gul A, Levy Y, Petera P, Popovic R, Petrovic R, Sinico RA, Cattaneo R, Font J, Depresseux G, Cosyns JP, Cervera R (2002) Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 46:2121–2131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pecoraro C, Malgieri G, D’Armiento M, Balletta MM, Nuzzi F, Caropreso M (2005) Treatment of childhood lupus nephritis with mycophenolate mofetil: clinical and histopathological study. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:557AGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lau KL, Jones DP, Hastings MC, Gaber LW, Ault BH (2006) Short-term outcomes of severe lupus nephritis in a cohort of predominantly African-American children. Pediatr Nephrol 21:655–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IPNA 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Director Clinical ResearchMiami Children’s HospitalMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations