Advertisement

A weak form quadrature element formulation of geometrically exact shells incorporating drilling degrees of freedom

  • Run Zhang
  • Hongzhi Zhong
  • Xiaohu Yao
Original Paper
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Geometrically nonlinear analysis of shell structures is conducted using weak form quadrature elements. A new geometrically exact shell formulation incorporating drilling degrees of freedom is established wherein rotation quaternions in combination with a total Lagrange updating scheme are employed for rotation description. An extended kinematic condition to serve as the drilling rotation constraint, derived from polar decomposition of modified mid-surface deformation gradient, is exactly satisfied in the formulation. Several benchmark examples are presented to illustrate the versatility and robustness of the present formulation.

Keywords

Geometrically exact shell Drilling degrees of freedom Polar decomposition of deformation Weak form quadrature element method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present investigation was performed with the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11702098), the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M612650) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017BQ096).

References

  1. 1.
    Ericksen JL, Truesdell C (1958) Exact theory of stress and strain in rods and shells. Arch Ration Mech Anal 1(4):295–323MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simo JC, Fox DD (1989) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part I: formulation and optimal parametrization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 72:267–304CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS (1990) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part III: the computational aspects of nonlinear theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 79:21–74CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rebel G (1998) Finite rotation shell theory including drill rotations and its finite element implementations. Ph.D dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacNeal RH, Wilson CT, Harder RL, Hoff CC (1998) The treatment of shell normals in finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 30:235–242CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allman DJ (1984) A compatible triangular element including vertex rotations for plane elasticity problems. Comput Struct 19:1–8CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hughes TJR, Brezzi F (1989) On drilling degrees of freedom. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 72:105–121MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox DD, Simo JC (1992) A drill rotation formulation for geometrically exact shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 98:329–343MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wriggers P, Gruttmann F (1993) Thin shells with finite rotation formulated in Biot stresses: theory and finite element formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:2049–2071CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruttmann F, Wagner W, Wriggers P (1992) A nonlinear quadrilateral shell element with drilling degrees of freedom. Arch Appl Mech 62:474–486CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibrahimbegović A (1994) Stress resultant geometrically nonlinear shell theory with drilling rotations-part I: a consistent formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 118:265–284CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reissner E (1974) Linear and nonlinear theory of shells. In: Thin shell structures: theory, experiment and design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 29–44Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiśniewski K, Turska E (2006) Enhanced Allman quadrilateral for finite drilling rotations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:6086–6109CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiśniewski K (2010) Finite rotation shells: basic equations and finite elements for reissner kinematics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang YQ, Zhong ZH, Chan SL (2016) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of shells by quadrilateral flat shell element with drill, shear, and warping. Int J Numer Meth Eng 108(10):1248–1272MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chróścielewski J, Makowski J, Stumpf H (1992) Genuinely resultant shell finite elements accounting for geometric and material non-linearity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 35:63–94CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chróścielewski J, Witkowski W (2006) Four-node semi-EAS element in six–field nonlinear theory of shells. Int J Numer Meth Eng 68:1137–1179CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campello EMB, Pimenta PM, Wriggers P (2003) A triangular finite shell element based on a fully nonlinear shell formulation. Comput Mech 31:505–518CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campello EMB, Pimenta PM, Wriggers P (2011) An exact conserving algorithm for nonlinear dynamics with rotational DOFs and general hyperelasticity. Part 2: shells. Comput Mech 48:195–211MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhong H, Yu T (2007) Flexural vibration analysis of an eccentric annular Mindlin plate. Arch Appl Mech 77(4):185–195CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhong H, Yu T (2009) A weak form quadrature element method for plane elasticity problems. Appl Math Model 33(10):3801–3814MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bellman RE, Casti J (1971) Differential quadrature and long term integration. J Math Anal Appl 34:235–238MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Striz AG, Chen WL, Bert CW (1994) Static analysis of structures by the quadrature element method (QEM). Int J Solids Struct 31(20):2807–2818CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhong H, Zhang R, Xiao N (2014) A quaternion-based weak form quadrature element formulation for spatial geometrically exact beams. Arch Appl Mech 84(12):1825–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang R, Zhong H (2016) A quadrature element formulation of an energy–momentum conserving algorithm for dynamic analysis of geometrically exact beams. Comput Struct 165:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Canuto C, Hussaini MY, Quarteroni A, Zang TA (2006) Spectral methods. fundamentals in single domains. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    He R, Zhong H (2012) Large deflection elasto-plastic analysis of frames using the weak form quadrature element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 50:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang R, Zhong H (2015) Weak form quadrature element analysis of geometrically exact shells. Int J Non-Linear Mech 71:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang R, Zhong H (2018) A weak form quadrature element formulation for geometrically exact thin shell analysis. Comput Struct 202:44–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mcrobie FA, Lasenby J (1999) Simo-Vu Quoc rods using Clifford algebra. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:377–398MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Auricchio F, Carotenuto P, Reali A (2008) On the geometrically exact beam model: a consistent, effective and simple derivation from three-dimensional finite elasticity. Int J Solids Struct 45:4766–4781CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simo JC, Fox DD, Hughes TJR (1992) Formulations of finite elasticity with independent rotations. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:277–288MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goldman R (2010) Rethinking quaternions: theory and computation. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San RafaelMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Davis PI, Rabinowitz P (1984) Methods of numerical integration, 2nd edn. Academic Press, OrlandoMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hoff CC, Harder RL, Campbell G, MacNeal RH, Wilson CT (1995) Analysis of shell structures using MSC/NASTRAN’s shell elements with surface normal. In: Proceedings of 1995 MSC World Users’ Conference Universal City, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    ABAQUS, Version 6.14 (2014) Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cook RD, Malcus DS, Plesha ME, Robert JW (2002) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th edn. London, WileyGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ibrahimbegović A, Frey F (1993) Geometrically non-linear method of incompatible modes in application to finite elasticity with independent rotations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:4185–4200CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Merlini T (1997) A variational formulation for finite elasticity with independent rotation and Biot-axial fields. Comput Mech 19:153–168CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goto WY, Watanabe Y, Kasugai T, Obata M (1992) Elastic buckling phenomenon applicable to deployable rings. Int J Solids Struct 29(7):893–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Romero I (2004) The interpolation of rotations and its application to finite element models of geometrically exact rods. Comput Mech 34:121–133MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Basar Y, Ding Y, Schultz R (1992) Refined shear-deformation models for composite laminates with finite rotations. Int J Solids Struct 30:2611–2638CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wagner W, Gruttmann F (2005) A robust non-linear mixed hybrid quadrilateral shell element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:635–666CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Crisfield MA (1991) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures. Wiley, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Betsch P, Gruttmann F, Stein E (1996) A 4-node finite element for the implementation of general hyperelastic 3D-elasticity at finite strains. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 130:57–79MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering Mechanics, School of Civil and Transportation EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations