Advertisement

Computational Mechanics

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 23–33 | Cite as

A mortar formulation including viscoelastic layers for vibration analysis

  • Alexander PaoliniEmail author
  • Stefan Kollmannsberger
  • Ernst Rank
  • Thomas Horger
  • Barbara Wohlmuth
Original Paper
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

In order to reduce the transfer of sound and vibrations in structures such as timber buildings, thin elastomer layers can be embedded between their components. The influence of these elastomers on the response of the structures in the low frequency range can be determined accurately by using conforming hexahedral finite elements. Three-dimensional mesh generation, however, is yet a non-trivial task and mesh refinements which may be necessary at the junctions can cause a high computational effort. One remedy is to mesh the components independently from each other and to couple them using the mortar method. Further, the hexahedral mesh for the thin elastomer layer itself can be avoided by integrating its elastic behavior into the mortar formulation. The present paper extends this mortar formulation to take damping into account such that frequency response analyses can be performed more accurately. Finally, the proposed method is verified by numerical examples.

Keywords

Mortar method Weak coupling High-order finite elements Vibrations Viscoelasticity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Grants RA-624/21-2, WO-671/11-1 and WO-671/13-2. They are also thankful to Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH for providing the values of material parameters.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera AT (1993) Domain decomposition by the mortar element method. In: Kaper HG, Garbey M, Pieper GW (eds) Asymptotic and numerical methods for partial differential equations with critical parameters, vol 384. NATO ASI series. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera AT (1994) A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method. Nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications. Coll France Semin XI:13–51zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben Belgacem F (1999) The Mortar finite element method with Lagrange multipliers. Numer Math 84(2):173–197MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wohlmuth BI (2000) A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the Lagrange multiplier. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38:989–1012MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wohlmuth BI (2001) Discretization methods and iterative solvers based on domain decomposition. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim C, Lazarov R, Pasciak J, Vassilevski P (2001) Multiplier spaces for the mortar finite element method in three dimensions. SIAM J Numer Anal 39(2):519–538MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamichhane BP, Wohlmuth BI (2002) Higher order dual Lagrange multiplier spaces for mortar finite element discretizations. CALCOLO 39:219–237MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamichhane BP, Stevenson RP, Wohlmuth BI (2005) Higher order mortar finite element methods in 3D with dual Lagrange multiplier bases. Numer Math 102:93–121MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casadei F, Gabellini E, Fotia G, Maggio F, Quarteroni A (2002) A mortar spectral/finite element method for complex 2D and 3D elastodynamic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(45):5119–5148MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Puso MA (2004) A 3D mortar method for solid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 59(3):315–336MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauret P, Le Tallec P (2007) A discontinuous stabilized mortar method for general 3D elastic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(49):4881–4900MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flemisch B, Wohlmuth BI (2007) Nonconforming methods for nonlinear elasticity problems. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Puso MA, Laursen TA, Solberg J (2008) A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(6):555–566MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wohlmuth BI, Popp A, Gee MW, Wall WA (2012) An abstract framework for a priori estimates for contact problems in 3D with quadratic finite elements. Comput Mech 49(6):735–747MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sitzmann S, Willner K, Wohlmuth BI (2015) A dual Lagrange method for contact problems with regularized frictional contact conditions: modelling micro slip. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 285:468–487MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seitz A, Farah P, Kremheller J, Wohlmuth BI, Wall WA, Popp A (2016) Isogeometric dual mortar methods for computational contact mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 301:259–280MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamichhane BP, Wohlmuth BI (2005) Mortar finite elements with dual Lagrange multipliers: some applications. In: Barth TJ et al (eds) Domain decomposition methods in science and engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 319–326Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flemisch B, Kaltenbacher M, Wohlmuth BI (2006) Elasto-acoustic and acoustic-acoustic coupling on non-matching grids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67(13):1791–1810MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rüberg T (2008) Non-conforming FEM/BEM coupling in time domain. Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz, GrazzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flemisch B, Kaltenbacher M, Triebenbacher S, Wohlmuth BI (2012) Non-matching grids for a flexible discretization in computational acoustics. Commun Comput Phys 11(02):472–488MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wassouf Z (2010) Die Mortar Methode für Finite Elemente hoher Ordnung. PhD thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Düster A, Rank E, Szabó BA (2017) The p-version of the finite element method and finite cell methods. In: Stein E, Borst R, Hughes TJ (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Babuska I, Szabó BA (1982) On the rates of convergence of the finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 18(3):323–341MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Düster A, Bröker H, Rank E (2001) The p-version of the finite element method for three-dimensional curved thin walled structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52(7):673–703CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Negreira J, Austrell P, Flodén O, Bard D (2014) Characterisation of an elastomer for noise and vibration insulation in lightweight timber buildings. Build Acoust 21(4):251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Winter C, Buchschmid M, Müller G, Rabold A, Mecking S, Schanda U, Rank E (2017) A high order finite element model for vibration analysis of cross laminated timber assemblies. Build Acoust 24(3):135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boström A, Bövik P, Olsson P (1992) A comparison of exact first order and spring boundary conditions for scattering by thin layers. J Nondestruct Eval 11(3–4):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bare DZ, Orlik J, Panasenko G (2014) Asymptotic dimension reduction of a Robin-type elasticity boundary value problem in thin beams. Appl Anal 93(6):1217–1238MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bolmsvik Å, Linderholt A, Brandt A, Ekevid T (2014) FE modelling of light weight wooden assemblies: parameter study and comparison between analyses and experiments. Eng Struct 73:125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bolmsvik Å, Linderholt A (2015) Damping elastomers for wooden constructions-dynamic properties. Wood Mater Sci Eng 10(3):245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flodén O, Sandberg G, Persson K (2018) Reduced order modelling of elastomeric vibration isolators in dynamic substructuring. Eng Struct 155:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Horger T, Kollmannsberger S, Frischmann F, Rank E, Wohlmuth BI (2014) A new mortar formulation for modeling elastomer bedded structures with modal-analysis in 3D. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 1:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cremer L, Heckl M (1988) Structure-borne sound. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roylance D (2001) Engineering viscoelasticity. Lecture notes, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rabold A (2010) Anwendung der Finite Element Methode auf die Trittschallberechnung. PhD thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH. Data sheet of Sylodyn® ND. September 2014Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH. Data sheet of Sylodyn® NE. September 2014Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gülzow A (2008) Zerstörungsfreie Bestimmung der Biegesteifigkeiten von Brettsperrholzplatten. PhD thesis, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Paolini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefan Kollmannsberger
    • 1
  • Ernst Rank
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas Horger
    • 3
  • Barbara Wohlmuth
    • 3
  1. 1.Chair for Computation in EngineeringTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Advanced StudyTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Numerical MathematicsTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations