Computational Mechanics

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 937–956 | Cite as

A frictional sliding algorithm for liquid droplets

Original Paper

Abstract

This work presents a new frictional sliding algorithm for liquid menisci in contact with solid substrates. In contrast to solid–solid contact, the liquid–solid contact behavior is governed by the contact line, where a contact angle forms and undergoes hysteresis. The new algorithm admits arbitrary meniscus shapes and arbitrary substrate roughness, heterogeneity and compliance. It is discussed and analyzed in the context of droplet contact, but it also applies to liquid films and solids with surface tension. The droplet is modeled as a stabilized membrane enclosing an incompressible medium. The contact formulation is considered rate-independent such that hydrostatic conditions apply. Three distinct contact algorithms are needed to describe the cases of frictionless surface contact, frictionless line contact and frictional line contact. For the latter, a predictor–corrector algorithm is proposed in order to enforce the contact conditions at the contact line and thus distinguish between the cases of advancing, pinning and receding. The algorithms are discretized within a monolithic finite element formulation. Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the numerical and physical behavior of sliding droplets.

Keywords

Computational contact mechanics Contact angle hysteresis Liquid meniscus Nonlinear finite element methods Rough surface contact Wetting 

Supplementary material

466_2016_1324_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (802 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (mpg 802 KB)
466_2016_1324_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (836 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (mpg 836 KB)
466_2016_1324_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (890 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (mpg 890 KB)
466_2016_1324_MOESM4_ESM.mpg (526 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (mpg 526 KB)
466_2016_1324_MOESM5_ESM.mpg (478 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (mpg 478 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Berim GO, Ruckenstein E (2008) Microscopic calculation of the sticking force for nanodrops on an inclined surface. J Chem Phys 129(11):114709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brakke KA (1992) The surface evolver. Exp Math 1(2):141–165MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown RA, Orr FM, Scriven LE (1980) Static drop on an inclined plate: analysis by the finite element method. J Colloid Interface Sci 73(1):76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chou T-H, Hong S-J, Sheng Y-J, Tsao H-K (2012) Drops sitting on a tilted plate: receding and advancing pinning. Langmuir 28:5158–5166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das AK, Das PK (2009) Simulation of drop movement over an inclined surface using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Langmuir 25(19):11459–11466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimitrakopoulos P, Higdon JJL (1999) On the gravitational displacement of three-dimensional fluid droplets from inclined solid surfaces. J Fluid Mech 395:181–209CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong S (2012) On imposing dynamic contact-angle boundary conditions for wall-bounded liquid-gas flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 247–248:179–200MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dupuis A, Yeomans JM (2006) Dynamics of sliding drops on superhydrophobic surfaces. Europhys Lett 75(1):105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dussan V EB (1979) On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 11:371–400Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dussan V EB, Chow RTP (1983) On the ability of drops or bubbles to stick to non-horizontal surfaces of solids. J Fluid Mech 137:1–29Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ElSherbini AI, Jacobi AM (2004) Liquid drops on vertical and inclined surfaces II. A method for approximating drop shapes. J Colloid Interface Sci 273:566–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Extrand CW, Kumagai Y (1995) Liquid-drops on an inclined plane—the relation between contact angles, drop shape, and retentive force. J Colloid Interface Sci 170(2):515–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fang C, Hidrovo C, Wang F, Eaton J, Goodson K (2008) 3-D numerical simulation of contact angle hysteresis for microscale two phase flow. Int J Multiph Flow 34:690–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goyal S, Ruina A, Papadopoulos J (1991) Planar sliding with dry friction. Part 1. Limit surface and moment function. Wear 143:307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iliev SD (1995) Iterative method for the shape of static drops. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 126:251–265MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iliev SD, Pesheva N (2006) Nonaxisymmetric drop shape analysis and its application for determination of the local contact angles. J Colloid Interface Sci 301(3–4):677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janardan N, Panchagnula MV (2014) Effect of the initial conditions on the onset of motion in sessile drops on tilted plates. Colloid Surf A 456:238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laursen TA (2002) Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics: fundamentals of modeling interfacial phenomena in nonlinear finite element analysis. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lawal A, Brown RA (1982a) The stability of an inclined pendent drop. J Colloid Interface Sci 89(2):332–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lawal A, Brown RA (1982b) The stability of inclined sessile drops. J Colloid Interface Sci 89(2):346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Milinazzo F, Shinbrot M (1988) A numerical study of a drop on a vertical wall. J Colloid Interface Sci 121(1):254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minaki H, Li S (2014) Multiscale modeling and simulation of dynamic wetting. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 273:273–302MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Osman M, Sauer RA (2014) A parametric study of the hydrophobicity of rough surfaces based on finite element computations. Colloid Surface A 461:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osman M, Sauer RA (2015) Computational analysis of wetting on hydrophobic surfaces: application to self-cleaning mechanisms. In: Mittal KL (ed) Advances in contact angle, wettability and adhesion, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park Y-G, Jacobi M (2009) Numerical modeling of liquid drop spreading behavior on inclined surfaces. In: Proceedings of ASME 2009 heat transfer summer conference, vol 3, pp 367–373Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prabhala BR, Panchagnula MV, Vedantam S (2013) Three-dimensional equilibrium shapes of drops on hysteretic surfaces. Colloid Polym Sci 291:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rotenberg Y, Borkuvka L, Neumann AW (1984) The shape of nonaxisymmetric drops on inclined planar surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 102(2):424–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Santos MJ, White JA (2011) Theory and simulation of angular hysteresis on planar surfaces. Langmuir 27:14868–14875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sauer RA (2014) Stabilized finite element formulations for liquid membranes and their application to droplet contact. Int J Numer. Methods Fluids 75(7):519–545MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sauer RA (2016) A contact theory for surface tension driven systems. Math Mech Solids 21(3):305–325MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sauer RA, De Lorenzis L (2013) A computational contact formulation based on surface potentials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 253:369–395Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sauer RA, De Lorenzis L (2015) An unbiased computational contact formulation for 3D friction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 101(4):251–280MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sauer RA, Duong TX (2015) On the theoretical foundations of solid and liquid shells. Math Mech Solids (published online). doi:10.1177/1081286515594656
  34. 34.
    Sauer RA, Duong TX, Corbett CJ (2014) A computational formulation for solid and liquid membranes based on curvilinear coordinates and isogeometric finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 271:48–68MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sauer RA, Duong TX, Mandadapu KK, Steigmann DJ (2016) A stabilized finite element formulation for liquid shells and its application to lipid bilayers. J Comput Phys (submitted). http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03907
  36. 36.
    Schwartz LW, Roux D, Cooper-White JJ (2005) On the shapes of droplets that are sliding on a vertical wall. Physica D 209:236–244MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Semprebon C, Brinkmann M (2014) On the onset of motion of sliding drops. Soft Matter 10(18):3325–3334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sethian JA, Smerekar P (2003) Level set methods for fluid interfaces. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:341–372MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Steigmann DJ (1999) Fluid films with curvature elasticity. Arch Ration Mech Anal 150:127–152MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Steigmann DJ, Li D (1995) Energy-minimizing states of capillary systems with bulk, surface and line phases. IMA J Appl Math 55(1):1–17MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sui Y, Ding H, Spelt PDM (2014) Numerical simulations of flows with moving contact lines. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:97–119MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tadmor R (2011) Approaches in wetting phenomena. Soft Matter 7:1577–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thampi SP, Adhikari R, Govindarajan R (2013) Do liquid drops roll or slide on inclined surfaces? Langmuir 29(10):3339–3346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thompson PA, Robbins MO (1989) Simulations of contact-line motion: slip and the dynamic contact angle. Phys Rev Lett 7:766–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science (AICES)RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations