Particle tracking and particle–shock interaction in compressible-flow computations with the V-SGS stabilization and \(YZ\beta \) shock-capturing
- 270 Downloads
The \(YZ\beta \) shock-capturing technique, which is residual-based, was introduced in conjunction with the Streamline-Upwind/Petrov–Galerkin (SUPG) formulation of compressible flows in conservation variables. It was later also combined with the variable subgrid scale (V-SGS) formulation of compressible flows in conservation variables and successfully tested on 2D and 3D computation of inviscid flows with shocks. In this paper we extend that combined method to inviscid flow computations with particle tracking and particle–shock interaction. Particles are tracked individually, assuming one-way dependence between the particle dynamics and the flow. We present two steady-state test computations with particle–shock interaction, one in 2D and one in 3D, and show that the overall method is effective in particle tracking and particle–shock interaction analysis in compressible flows.
KeywordsParticle tracking Particle–shock interaction Compressible flow V-SGS stabilization \(YZ\beta \) shock-capturing
This work was supported by the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Rome “La Sapienza” under the Bilateral Agreement UDEP/“La Sapienza”. Partial support was provided by the Italian Ministry of University and Academic Research, under the Visiting Professor Program, 2009. The last author was supported in part by ARO Grant W911NF-12-1-0162.
- 4.Hughes TJR, Brooks AN (1979) A multi-dimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion. In: Hughes TJR (ed) Finite element methods for convection dominated flows, AMD, vol 34. ASME, New York, pp 19–35Google Scholar
- 6.Tezduyar TE, Hughes TJR (1983) Finite element formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations. In: Proceedings of AIAA 21st aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA Paper 83–0125, Reno, NevadaGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Mallet M (1987) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VI. convergence analysis of the generalized SUPG formulation for linear time-dependent multi-dimensional advective-diffusive systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 63:97–112zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Le Beau GJ, Tezduyar TE (1991) Finite element computation of compressible flows with the SUPG formulation. In: Dhaubhadel MN, Engelman MS, Reddy JN (eds) Advances in finiteelement analysis in fluid dynamics, FED-vol 123. ASME, New York, pp 21–27Google Scholar
- 11.Tezduyar TE (2004) Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces, Volume 3: Fluids, Chapter 17. In: Stein E, Borst RD, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
- 12.Tezduyar TE (2004) Determination of the stabilization and shock-capturing parameters in SUPG formulation of compressible flows. In: Proceedings of the European Congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, ECCOMAS 2004 (CD-ROM), Jyvaskyla, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- 31.Sommerfeld M, van Wachem B, Olimans R (2009) Dispersed turbulent multi-phase flow in Best practice guidelines, ERCOFTAC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 35.Miranda FC, Heinrich A, Sesterhenn J (2013) The influence of the fluid acceleration term on the simulation of a particle-laden compressible jet with shock waves. In: European Turbulence Conference 14. ENS de Lyon, LyonGoogle Scholar